SB 237 — Real estate appraisers.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 173, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Real Estate Appraisers' Licensing and Certification Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of real estate appraisers and vests the duty of enforcing and administering that law in the Office of Real Estate Appraisers. Fees and assessments collected under these provisions are deposited into the Real Estate Appraisers Regulation Fund, and 5% of the amount of any license or certificate fee collected is credited to the Recovery Account in that fund, which account is continuously appropriated. Existing law subjects applicants for real estate appraisers licenses to fingerprinting and criminal background checks. This bill would require appraisal management companies, as defined, to register with the Office of Real Estate Appraisers, and would subject those entities to the provisions of the Real Estate Appraisers' Licensing and Certification Law. The bill would require the office to adopt regulations governing the implementation of the registration process, with specified minimum requirements, and establish the fees to be imposed for registration in an amount sufficient to cover the costs incurred by the office in administering the registration. Because 5% of those fees would be credited to the Recovery Account, a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would also require fingerprinting and background checks by the Department of Justice of each controlling person of an applicant for registration, as defined, and would require the department to charge all applicants for licensure or registration specified fees for those services. The bill would also set forth standards with which an appraisal management company would need to comply, and would provide to the office specified investigative and enforcement authority, including the authority to issue citations or administrative penalties for a violation thereof, to be deposited into the Real Estate Appraisers Regulation Fund. The bill would make conforming changes within other provisions of the Real Estate Appraisers' Licensing and Certification Law to incorporate the changes made by the bill. This bill would make any provision under the Real Estate Appraisers' Licensing and Certification Law that relates to appraisal management companies inoperative 60 days after the effective date of any federal law that mandates the registration or licensing of appraisal management companies with an entity other than the state regulatory authority with jurisdiction over appraisers. Existing law prohibits a person with an interest in a real estate transaction involving an appraisal to improperly influence or attempt to improperly influence, through coercion, extortion, or bribery, the development, reporting, result, or review of a real estate appraisal sought in connection with a mortgage loan, and specifies that a violation of this provision by a person licensed under a state licensing law also constitutes a violation of that law. This bill would enumerate specified prohibited acts under that provision, including, but not limited to, withholding or threatening to withhold timely payment for an appraisal, or requesting the payment of compensation to achieve higher priority in the assignment of appraisal business.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 08/27/09 - Enrolled pdf August 27, 2009
- Amended 08/17/09 - Amended Assembly pdf August 17, 2009
- Amended 06/17/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 17, 2009
- Amended 06/03/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 03, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/24/09 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2009
- SB237 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 173, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.
-
Ordered held in Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Returned by the Governor at the request of the Senate.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 34. Noes 3. Page 1976.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 63. Noes 9. Page 2667.) To Senate.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 2610.) To third reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.)
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on June 16.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
To Com. on B. & P.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 794.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 655.)
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 20.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 806.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Set for hearing April 13.
-
To Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 27.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Calderon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Calderon
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 7% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 9 | 0 | 7 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 74 | 9 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 10% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 0% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Not Voting |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 0% | 0% | 38% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 9% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 237 do?
- Existing law, the Real Estate Appraisers' Licensing and Certification Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of real estate appraisers and vests the duty of enforcing and administering that law in the Office of Real Estate Appraisers. Fees and assessments collected under these provisions are deposited into the Real Estate Appraisers Regulation Fund, and 5% of the amount of any license or certificate fee collected is credited to the Recovery Account in that fund, which account is continuously appropriated. Existing law subjects applicants for real estate appraisers licenses to fingerprinting and criminal background checks. This bill would require appraisal management companies, as defined, to register with the Office of Real Estate Appraisers, and would subject those entities to the provisions of the Real Estate Appraisers' Licensing and Certification Law. The bill would require the office to adopt regulations governing the implementation of the registration process, with specified minimum requirements, and establish the fees to be imposed for registration in an amount sufficient to cover the costs incurred by the office in administering the registration. Because 5% of those fees would be credited to the Recovery Account, a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would also require fingerprinting and background checks by the Department of Justice of each controlling person of an applicant for registration, as defined, and would require the department to charge all applicants for licensure or registration specified fees for those services. The bill would also set forth standards with which an appraisal management company would need to comply, and would provide to the office specified investigative and enforcement authority, including the authority to issue citations or administrative penalties for a violation thereof, to be deposited into the Real Estate Appraisers Regulation Fund. The bill would make conforming changes within other provisions of the Real Estate Appraisers' Licensing and Certification Law to incorporate the changes made by the bill. This bill would make any provision under the Real Estate Appraisers' Licensing and Certification Law that relates to appraisal management companies inoperative 60 days after the effective date of any federal law that mandates the registration or licensing of appraisal management companies with an entity other than the state regulatory authority with jurisdiction over appraisers. Existing law prohibits a person with an interest in a real estate transaction involving an appraisal to improperly influence or attempt to improperly influence, through coercion, extortion, or bribery, the development, reporting, result, or review of a real estate appraisal sought in connection with a mortgage loan, and specifies that a violation of this provision by a person licensed under a state licensing law also constitutes a violation of that law. This bill would enumerate specified prohibited acts under that provision, including, but not limited to, withholding or threatening to withhold timely payment for an appraisal, or requesting the payment of compensation to achieve higher priority in the assignment of appraisal business.
- Who sponsors SB 237?
- SB 237 is sponsored by Calderon.
- What is the current status of SB 237?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 237?
- Track SB 237 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 237
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 237
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →