California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 89 — Gaming.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1, Statutes of 2010.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments of tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. This bill would ratify the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake, executed on September 2, 2009. The bill would require that related revenue contributions be deposited into the General Fund, except as specified, and would also provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions may not be deemed projects for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1, Statutes of 2010.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 11:45 a.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 30. Noes 3. Page 2607.) To enrollment.

  5. Urgency clause adopted.

  6. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  7. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 69. Noes 0. Page 3638.) To Senate.

  8. Read third time. Amended. (Page 3638.) To third reading.

  9. From inactive file to third reading file.

  10. Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Torrico.

  11. Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Krekorian.

  12. Read second time. To third reading.

  13. Placed on second reading file.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 517.) To Assembly.

  16. Read second time. To third reading.

  17. Placed on second reading file.

  18. Withdrawn from committee.

  19. To Com. on RLS.

  20. Read first time.

  21. From print. May be acted upon on or after February 20.

  22. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB89 Committee on B. & F.R. (Ducheny) Urgency Clause

Passed 31 Yea · 3 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 28306
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 31306
% of votes cast 78%8%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Not Voting
Hancock — Not Voting
Cogdill — Not Voting
Alquist — Not Voting
Ducheny — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Kehoe — Nay
Maldonado — Yea
Pavley — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Nay
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SB 89 B.& F. R. Third Reading Urgency By CHESBRO

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 13 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 720013
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 780013
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Tom — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Charles — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Knight — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Bill — Not Voting
De — Not Voting
La — Not Voting
Torre — Not Voting
Harkey — Not Voting
Monning — Not Voting
Adams — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Villines — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Not Voting
Feuer — Not Voting
DeVore — Not Voting
Yamada — Not Voting
Fuller — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Senate 3rd Reading SB89 Committee on B. & F.R. (Ducheny)

Passed 23 Yea · 14 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211302
Democratic 2001
Republican 0100
Total 231403
% of votes cast 58%35%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Hollingsworth — Nay
Huff — Nay
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Runner — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Harman — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Romero — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety elections
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 89 do?
Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments of tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. This bill would ratify the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake, executed on September 2, 2009. The bill would require that related revenue contributions be deposited into the General Fund, except as specified, and would also provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions may not be deemed projects for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 89?
SB 89 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 89?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 89?
Track SB 89 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 89

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 89

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →