Telecommunications universal service programs: California Advanced Services Fund.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1040 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1040.
You're tracking SB 1040
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1040 — Telecommunications universal service programs: California Advanced Services Fund.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 317, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The existing federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 establishes a program for the regulation of telecommunications to attain the goal of local competition, while implementing specific, predictable, and sufficient federal and state mechanisms to preserve and advance universal service, consistent with certain universal service principles. The universal service principles include the principle that consumers in all regions of the nation, including low-income consumers and those in rural, insular, and high-cost areas, should have access to telecommunications and information services, including interexchange services and advanced telecommunications and information services, that are reasonably comparable to those services provided in urban areas and that are available at rates that are reasonably comparable to rates charged for similar services in urban areas. Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including telephone corporations, as defined. Existing law, until January 1, 2013, establishes the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) in the State Treasury, and requires a surcharge, which is imposed by the commission and collected through retail telecommunications customers' bills, to be deposited in that fund. Existing law prohibits the commission from collecting more than $100,000,000 through the surcharge. Existing law requires the commission to develop, implement, and administer the CASF to provide for transfer payments to encourage deployment of high-quality advanced communications services to all Californians that will promote economic growth, job creation, and substantial social benefits of advanced information and communications technologies, as provided in a specified decision of the commission. Existing law requires the commission to conduct both a financial audit and a performance audit on the implementation and effectiveness of CASF and to report its findings to the Legislature by December 31, 2010. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions indefinitely, and would prohibit the commission from collecting more than $225,000,000 through the CASF surcharge pursuant to a specified schedule. The bill would establish 3 accounts within the fund and allocate a portion of the additional $125,000,000 that the bill authorizes to be collected, to be deposited into each of the accounts, for specified uses. The bill would require the commission to conduct an interim and final financial audit and interim and final performance audit on the implementation and effectiveness of CASF and to report to the Legislature its interim findings by April 1, 2011, and its final findings by April 1, 2017. The bill would require the commission to annually provide a report to the Legislature, until January 1, 2016, relating to the CASF and containing specified information. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/27/10 - Chaptered Current pdf September 27, 2010
- Enrolled 08/30/10 - Enrolled pdf August 30, 2010
- Amended 08/16/10 - Amended Assembly pdf August 16, 2010
- Amended 06/23/10 - Amended Assembly pdf June 23, 2010
- Amended 06/21/10 - Amended Assembly pdf June 21, 2010
- Amended 06/10/10 - Amended Assembly pdf June 10, 2010
- Amended 04/27/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 27, 2010
- Amended 04/13/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 13, 2010
- Introduced 02/12/10 - Introduced pdf February 12, 2010
- SB1040 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 317, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 11:45 a.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 32. Noes 1. Page 4888.) To enrollment.
-
(Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4888.)
-
Reconsideration granted.
-
Motion to reconsider made by Senator Blakeslee.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4858.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 61. Noes 16. Page 6366.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
-
(Heard in committee August 12.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in Committee on June 14.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
To Com. on U. & C.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 3410.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3334.)
-
Set for hearing April 26.
-
(April 13 amended version corrected April 21.)
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3082.)
-
Set for hearing April 6.
-
To Com. on E., U., & C.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 15.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Stephen C. Padilla · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 30 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 3% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 66 | 17 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 71 | 18 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 20% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 19% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1040 do?
- The existing federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 establishes a program for the regulation of telecommunications to attain the goal of local competition, while implementing specific, predictable, and sufficient federal and state mechanisms to preserve and advance universal service, consistent with certain universal service principles. The universal service principles include the principle that consumers in all regions of the nation, including low-income consumers and those in rural, insular, and high-cost areas, should have access to telecommunications and information services, including interexchange services and advanced telecommunications and information services, that are reasonably comparable to those services provided in urban areas and that are available at rates that are reasonably comparable to rates charged for similar services in urban areas. Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including telephone corporations, as defined. Existing law, until January 1, 2013, establishes the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) in the State Treasury, and requires a surcharge, which is imposed by the commission and collected through retail telecommunications customers' bills, to be deposited in that fund. Existing law prohibits the commission from collecting more than $100,000,000 through the surcharge. Existing law requires the commission to develop, implement, and administer the CASF to provide for transfer payments to encourage deployment of high-quality advanced communications services to all Californians that will promote economic growth, job creation, and substantial social benefits of advanced information and communications technologies, as provided in a specified decision of the commission. Existing law requires the commission to conduct both a financial audit and a performance audit on the implementation and effectiveness of CASF and to report its findings to the Legislature by December 31, 2010. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions indefinitely, and would prohibit the commission from collecting more than $225,000,000 through the CASF surcharge pursuant to a specified schedule. The bill would establish 3 accounts within the fund and allocate a portion of the additional $125,000,000 that the bill authorizes to be collected, to be deposited into each of the accounts, for specified uses. The bill would require the commission to conduct an interim and final financial audit and interim and final performance audit on the implementation and effectiveness of CASF and to report to the Legislature its interim findings by April 1, 2011, and its final findings by April 1, 2017. The bill would require the commission to annually provide a report to the Legislature, until January 1, 2016, relating to the CASF and containing specified information. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 1040?
- SB 1040 is sponsored by Padilla, Stephen C. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 1040?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1040?
- Track SB 1040 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1040
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1040
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →