California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 193 — Taxation.

Last action — Died on Senate third reading file.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law impose taxes on, or measured by, income. Existing law allows a tax return or return information filed under those laws to be disclosed in a judicial or administrative proceeding pertaining to tax administration under certain circumstances. Existing law requires every board, as defined under the Business and Professions Code, and the Department of Insurance to, upon request of the Franchise Tax Board, furnish to the Franchise Tax Board certain information with respect to every licensee. This bill would require a state governmental licensing entity, as defined, issuing professional or occupational licenses, certificates, registrations, or permits to provide to the Franchise Tax Board the name and social security number or federal taxpayer identification number of each individual licensee of that entity. The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board, if an individual licensee fails to pay taxes for which a notice of state tax lien has been recorded, as specified, to send a notice of suspension to the licensee. The bill would provide that the license of a licensee who fails to satisfy the unpaid taxes by a certain date shall be automatically suspended, except as specified, and would require the Franchise Tax Board to mail a notice of suspension to the applicable state governmental licensing entity and to the licensee, and would provide that the suspension be canceled upon compliance with the tax obligation. The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to meet certain requirements and would make related changes. The bill would make implementation of its provisions contingent upon appropriation of funds for that purpose in the annual Budget Act. (2) The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use or other consumption in this state, measured by sales price. That law defines a "retailer engaged in business in this state" to include retailers that engage in specified activities in this state and requires every retailer engaged in business in this state and making sales of tangible personal property for storage, use, or other consumption in this state to register with the State Board of Equalization and to collect the tax from the purchaser and remit it to the board. This bill would include in the definition of a "retailer engaged in business in this state" any retailer entering into agreements under which a person in this state, for a commission or other consideration, directly or indirectly refers potential purchasers, whether by a link or an Internet Web site or otherwise, to the retailer, provided the total cumulative sales price from all sales by the retailer to purchasers in this state that are referred pursuant to these agreements is in excess of $10,000 within the preceding 12 months, except as specified. (3) The Sales and Use Tax Law requires a person conducting business as a seller of tangible personal property in this state to obtain a permit from the State Board of Equalization for each place of business and also requires a person selling tangible personal property for storage, use, or other consumption in this state to register with the State Board of Equalization. This bill would require a qualified purchaser, as defined, to register with the State Board of Equalization and to report and pay by April 15, the use tax owed for the previous calendar year, as provided. This bill would not apply to the purchase of a vehicle, vessel, or aircraft. (4) The Franchise Tax Board administers the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law. Existing law authorizes persons that are required to withhold taxes from recipients of income to require the recipients of the income to provide that person with the recipient's name and address. This bill would require the recipient of income to also provide the person paying the income with the recipient's social security number or other taxpayer identification number if requested by the person paying the income. (5) Existing law provides that the Franchise Tax Board, may, by regulation, require any person to withhold an amount, determined by the Franchise Tax Board to reasonably represent the amount of tax due, as specified, and to transmit the amount withheld to the Franchise Tax Board at a designated time. This bill would, in modified conformity with the federal income tax law, require backup withholding, as provided, at a rate of 7% on specified payments made on or after January 1, 2010, whenever such payments are subject to federal backup withholding. (6) Existing law requires the Franchise Tax Board to prepare wage withholding tables to be used by employers for purposes of withholding taxes on wages paid. Existing law allows, in lieu of the withholding tables, withholding at a rate of 6% with respect to supplemental wages and at a rate of 9.3% with respect to stock options and bonus payments. This bill would, for wages paid on or after October 1, 2009, require the wage withholding tables to produce a sum that is equal to 10% more than the sum specified for purposes of the withholding tables. This bill would, also increase the withholding rates to 6.6% for supplemental wages and to 10.23% for stock options and bonus payments paid on or after October 1, 2009. (7) Existing law requires every employer who pays wages to an employee for services performed in this state to withhold from those wages, except as provided, specified income taxes, and authorizes the Franchise Tax Board to impose specified requirements for withholding of those taxes. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2010, require a person engaged in a trade or business required to file a federal Form 1099-MISC, as described, to deduct and withhold tax for medical and health care payments and nonemployee compensation in the amount of 3% of payments to residents and 7% of payments to nonresidents, with certain exceptions. The bill would require all state agencies to cooperate with the Franchise Tax Board to expedite associated procurement, and the development, implementation, and operation of this withholding program. This bill would establish a new crime with respect to the failure to withhold taxes, and thus would create a state-mandated local program. (8) Existing income tax laws require specified individuals to pay estimated income taxes in installments and impose additional liability for underpayments. This bill would adjust the amount of those installments under specified circumstances. (9) The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law impose a penalty for underpayment of estimated tax. Existing law provides for a credit based on taxes withheld on wages, in modified conformity with federal income tax laws, against the estimated tax payments, including a provision that "an equal part" of that amount is deemed paid on each due date for a taxable year. This bill would substitute "the applicable percentage," as defined, for "an equal part" under this provision, as provided. (10) Existing laws require the Franchise Tax Board to administer specified taxes and collect those taxes from delinquent tax debtors. This bill would require the board, in coordination with financial institutions doing business in this state, to operate a Financial Institution Record Match System utilizing automated data exchanges to the maximum extent feasible in order to allow the board to match its list of delinquent tax debtors with the lists provided by the financial institutions. The bill would authorize the board to disclose specified taxpayer information for purposes of data matching, to institute civil proceedings to enforce specified provisions of the bill, and would impose specified penalties on financial institutions for failure to provide records in connection with the match system, as provided. This bill would provide that the specified use of certain data is a misdemeanor. (11) Existing law imposes various taxes and fees, and certain penalties in connection with tax avoidance and abusive tax shelters, including reportable transactions. This bill would expand the definition of reportable transactions to include abusive tax avoidance transactions, as defined, and transactions of interest, as defined. This bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to conform to this reference. (12) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (13) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Died on Senate third reading file.

  2. Read second time. To third reading.

  3. To second reading.

  4. From inactive file.

  5. To inactive file on motion of Senator Ducheny.

  6. Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 1491.)

  7. Motion to reconsider made by Senator Ducheny.

  8. Read third time. Urgency clause refused adoption. (Ayes 23. Noes 14. Page 1491.)

  9. Senate Rule 29.3 suspended.

  10. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 23. Noes 13.) (June 26).

  12. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.

  13. Read third time and amended.

  14. Read second time. To third reading.

  15. Withdrawn from committee. Ordered placed on second reading file.

  16. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  17. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  18. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 0. Page 1228.)

  19. Read second time. To third reading.

  20. Withdrawn from committee. Ordered placed on second reading file.

  21. Referred to Com. on BUDGET.

  22. From printer. May be heard in committee March 5.

  23. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35003
Republican 1000
Democratic 1001
Total 37004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Failed 24 Yea · 14 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 221303
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 241403
% of votes cast 59%34%0%7%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Harman — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Huff — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Runner — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Romero — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Oropeza — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 24 Yea · 13 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 221204
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 241304
% of votes cast 59%32%0%10%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Harman — Nay
Huff — Not Voting
Runner — Nay
Leno — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Correa — Not Voting
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Romero — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wright — Not Voting
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 60 Yea · 0 Nay · 32 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 540030
Republican 1002
Democratic 5000
Total 600032
% of votes cast 65%0%0%35%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Not Voting
Adams — Not Voting
Anderson — Not Voting
Bass — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Cook — Not Voting
Duvall — Not Voting
Fuller — Not Voting
Garrick — Not Voting
Gilmore — Not Voting
Harkey — Not Voting
Jeffries — Not Voting
Knight — Not Voting
Logue — Not Voting
Miller — Not Voting
Nestande — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Not Voting
Yamada — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Bill — Not Voting
Berryhill — Not Voting
Tom — Not Voting
Berryhill — Not Voting
Fletcher — Not Voting
Gaines — Not Voting
Audra — Not Voting
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hall — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Beall — Yea
Coto — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Not Voting
Silva — Not Voting
Torres — Yea
Villines — Not Voting
Emmerson — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Not Voting
Fuentes — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 193 do?
(1) The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law impose taxes on, or measured by, income. Existing law allows a tax return or return information filed under those laws to be disclosed in a judicial or administrative proceeding pertaining to tax administration under certain circumstances. Existing law requires every board, as defined under the Business and Professions Code, and the Department of Insurance to, upon request of the Franchise Tax Board, furnish to the Franchise Tax Board certain information with respect to every licensee. This bill would require a state governmental licensing entity, as defined, issuing professional or occupational licenses, certificates, registrations, or permits to provide to the Franchise Tax Board the name and social security number or federal taxpayer identification number of each individual licensee of that entity. The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board, if an individual licensee fails to pay taxes for which a notice of state tax lien has been recorded, as specified, to send a notice of suspension to the licensee. The bill would provide that the license of a licensee who fails to satisfy the unpaid taxes by a certain date shall be automatically suspended, except as specified, and would require the Franchise Tax Board to mail a notice of suspension to the applicable state governmental licensing entity and to the licensee, and would provide that the suspension be canceled upon compliance with the tax obligation. The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to meet certain requirements and would make related changes. The bill would make implementation of its provisions contingent upon appropriation of funds for that purpose in the annual Budget Act. (2) The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use or other consumption in this state, measured by sales price. That law defines a "retailer engaged in business in this state" to include retailers that engage in specified activities in this state and requires every retailer engaged in business in this state and making sales of tangible personal property for storage, use, or other consumption in this state to register with the State Board of Equalization and to collect the tax from the purchaser and remit it to the board. This bill would include in the definition of a "retailer engaged in business in this state" any retailer entering into agreements under which a person in this state, for a commission or other consideration, directly or indirectly refers potential purchasers, whether by a link or an Internet Web site or otherwise, to the retailer, provided the total cumulative sales price from all sales by the retailer to purchasers in this state that are referred pursuant to these agreements is in excess of $10,000 within the preceding 12 months, except as specified. (3) The Sales and Use Tax Law requires a person conducting business as a seller of tangible personal property in this state to obtain a permit from the State Board of Equalization for each place of business and also requires a person selling tangible personal property for storage, use, or other consumption in this state to register with the State Board of Equalization. This bill would require a qualified purchaser, as defined, to register with the State Board of Equalization and to report and pay by April 15, the use tax owed for the previous calendar year, as provided. This bill would not apply to the purchase of a vehicle, vessel, or aircraft. (4) The Franchise Tax Board administers the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law. Existing law authorizes persons that are required to withhold taxes from recipients of income to require the recipients of the income to provide that person with the recipient's name and address. This bill would require the recipient of income to also provide the person paying the income with the recipient's social security number or other taxpayer identification number if requested by the person paying the income. (5) Existing law provides that the Franchise Tax Board, may, by regulation, require any person to withhold an amount, determined by the Franchise Tax Board to reasonably represent the amount of tax due, as specified, and to transmit the amount withheld to the Franchise Tax Board at a designated time. This bill would, in modified conformity with the federal income tax law, require backup withholding, as provided, at a rate of 7% on specified payments made on or after January 1, 2010, whenever such payments are subject to federal backup withholding. (6) Existing law requires the Franchise Tax Board to prepare wage withholding tables to be used by employers for purposes of withholding taxes on wages paid. Existing law allows, in lieu of the withholding tables, withholding at a rate of 6% with respect to supplemental wages and at a rate of 9.3% with respect to stock options and bonus payments. This bill would, for wages paid on or after October 1, 2009, require the wage withholding tables to produce a sum that is equal to 10% more than the sum specified for purposes of the withholding tables. This bill would, also increase the withholding rates to 6.6% for supplemental wages and to 10.23% for stock options and bonus payments paid on or after October 1, 2009. (7) Existing law requires every employer who pays wages to an employee for services performed in this state to withhold from those wages, except as provided, specified income taxes, and authorizes the Franchise Tax Board to impose specified requirements for withholding of those taxes. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2010, require a person engaged in a trade or business required to file a federal Form 1099-MISC, as described, to deduct and withhold tax for medical and health care payments and nonemployee compensation in the amount of 3% of payments to residents and 7% of payments to nonresidents, with certain exceptions. The bill would require all state agencies to cooperate with the Franchise Tax Board to expedite associated procurement, and the development, implementation, and operation of this withholding program. This bill would establish a new crime with respect to the failure to withhold taxes, and thus would create a state-mandated local program. (8) Existing income tax laws require specified individuals to pay estimated income taxes in installments and impose additional liability for underpayments. This bill would adjust the amount of those installments under specified circumstances. (9) The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law impose a penalty for underpayment of estimated tax. Existing law provides for a credit based on taxes withheld on wages, in modified conformity with federal income tax laws, against the estimated tax payments, including a provision that "an equal part" of that amount is deemed paid on each due date for a taxable year. This bill would substitute "the applicable percentage," as defined, for "an equal part" under this provision, as provided. (10) Existing laws require the Franchise Tax Board to administer specified taxes and collect those taxes from delinquent tax debtors. This bill would require the board, in coordination with financial institutions doing business in this state, to operate a Financial Institution Record Match System utilizing automated data exchanges to the maximum extent feasible in order to allow the board to match its list of delinquent tax debtors with the lists provided by the financial institutions. The bill would authorize the board to disclose specified taxpayer information for purposes of data matching, to institute civil proceedings to enforce specified provisions of the bill, and would impose specified penalties on financial institutions for failure to provide records in connection with the match system, as provided. This bill would provide that the specified use of certain data is a misdemeanor. (11) Existing law imposes various taxes and fees, and certain penalties in connection with tax avoidance and abusive tax shelters, including reportable transactions. This bill would expand the definition of reportable transactions to include abusive tax avoidance transactions, as defined, and transactions of interest, as defined. This bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to conform to this reference. (12) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (13) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 193?
AB 193 is sponsored by Committee on Budget.
What is the current status of AB 193?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 193?
Track AB 193 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 193

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 193

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →