SB 744 — Clinical laboratories.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 201, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the licensure, registration, and regulation of clinical laboratories and various clinical laboratory personnel by the State Department of Public Health and makes a violation of those provisions a crime. Existing law requires the department to deem certain laboratories accredited by private, nonprofit organizations as meeting state licensure or registration requirements if certain conditions are met. Under existing law, the private, nonprofit organization must, among other things, be approved by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) of the federal Department of Health and Human Services and must be approved by the department as having accreditation standards that are equal to, or more stringent than, state requirements for licensure or registration. The laboratory must meet the accreditation standards of that organization and must agree to permit the organization to provide records or other information to the department. This bill would require the private, nonprofit organization to be approved by the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services instead of HCFA, to conduct inspections of clinical laboratories in a manner that will determine compliance with existing law, as specified, and to provide the department with additional information including, among other things, a detailed description of the inspection process and a description of the process for monitoring proficiency testing performance. The bill would require the organization to be approved by the department as meeting these requirements and would require the department to begin accepting applications for approval by January 1, 2011. The bill would also require the laboratory to meet additional conditions, including authorizing the private, nonprofit organization to release specified proficiency testing results and notification of condition-level requirement violations or withdrawal of laboratory accreditation. The bill would prohibit the department from conducting routine inspections of laboratories receiving a certificate pursuant to these provisions. Existing law specifies various fees applicable to clinical laboratories and laboratory personnel and requires the deposit of those fees in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Fund. Existing law requires that, upon appropriation, moneys deposited in that fund be expended by the department to administer these provisions. Existing law requires the issuance of a separate license for each laboratory location, except as specified. Among other entities, not-for-profit, or federal, state, or local government laboratories engaging in limited public health testing are authorized to apply for a single license or registration, as specified. This bill would impose a fee for approval of each of those laboratories and would increase certain other fees applicable to laboratories and laboratory personnel. The bill would prohibit the fees imposed from exceeding the costs incurred by the department in regulating clinical laboratories and their personnel. The bill would require all interest earned on moneys deposited in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Fund to be maintained in the fund and would prohibit the redirection of moneys in the fund for any other purpose. The bill would require the department to report to the Legislature by July 1, 2013, on the extent to which the state clinical laboratory oversight program meets or exceeds federal standards, the extent to which the federal government is accepting exemption applications from states relative to federal CLIA oversight, and the potential cost to the state for an exemption. Existing law provides for the renewal of a clinical laboratory license or registration and requires that the renewal fee be paid during the 30-day period before the expiration of the license or registration. Existing law specifies that failure to pay the renewal fee results in forfeiture of the license or registration after a period of 60 days from the expiration date. This bill would require a licensee or registrant that fails to renew a license or registration before the expiration date to pay a specified delinquency fee for up to 60 days after the expiration date, in addition to the renewal fee. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/10/09 - Enrolled pdf September 10, 2009
- Amended 07/14/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 14, 2009
- Amended 07/01/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 01, 2009
- Amended 05/21/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 21, 2009
- Amended 05/14/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 14, 2009
- Amended 04/22/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 22, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- SB744 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 201, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2288.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 70. Noes 3. Page 2936.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(Received by Desk on August 28 pursuant to Joint Rule 61(a)(11).)
-
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on July 7.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
To Coms. on B. & P. and HEALTH.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1094.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 1026.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 26.
-
Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 18.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing May 11.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 676.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & E.D. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 557.)
-
Set for hearing April 15.
-
To Coms. on HEALTH and B., P. & E.D.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Tony Strickland · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Strickland, Tony Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 75 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 81 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 4% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 9% | 0% | 36% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Business, Professions and Economic Development.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 744 do?
- (1) Existing law provides for the licensure, registration, and regulation of clinical laboratories and various clinical laboratory personnel by the State Department of Public Health and makes a violation of those provisions a crime. Existing law requires the department to deem certain laboratories accredited by private, nonprofit organizations as meeting state licensure or registration requirements if certain conditions are met. Under existing law, the private, nonprofit organization must, among other things, be approved by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) of the federal Department of Health and Human Services and must be approved by the department as having accreditation standards that are equal to, or more stringent than, state requirements for licensure or registration. The laboratory must meet the accreditation standards of that organization and must agree to permit the organization to provide records or other information to the department. This bill would require the private, nonprofit organization to be approved by the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services instead of HCFA, to conduct inspections of clinical laboratories in a manner that will determine compliance with existing law, as specified, and to provide the department with additional information including, among other things, a detailed description of the inspection process and a description of the process for monitoring proficiency testing performance. The bill would require the organization to be approved by the department as meeting these requirements and would require the department to begin accepting applications for approval by January 1, 2011. The bill would also require the laboratory to meet additional conditions, including authorizing the private, nonprofit organization to release specified proficiency testing results and notification of condition-level requirement violations or withdrawal of laboratory accreditation. The bill would prohibit the department from conducting routine inspections of laboratories receiving a certificate pursuant to these provisions. Existing law specifies various fees applicable to clinical laboratories and laboratory personnel and requires the deposit of those fees in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Fund. Existing law requires that, upon appropriation, moneys deposited in that fund be expended by the department to administer these provisions. Existing law requires the issuance of a separate license for each laboratory location, except as specified. Among other entities, not-for-profit, or federal, state, or local government laboratories engaging in limited public health testing are authorized to apply for a single license or registration, as specified. This bill would impose a fee for approval of each of those laboratories and would increase certain other fees applicable to laboratories and laboratory personnel. The bill would prohibit the fees imposed from exceeding the costs incurred by the department in regulating clinical laboratories and their personnel. The bill would require all interest earned on moneys deposited in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Fund to be maintained in the fund and would prohibit the redirection of moneys in the fund for any other purpose. The bill would require the department to report to the Legislature by July 1, 2013, on the extent to which the state clinical laboratory oversight program meets or exceeds federal standards, the extent to which the federal government is accepting exemption applications from states relative to federal CLIA oversight, and the potential cost to the state for an exemption. Existing law provides for the renewal of a clinical laboratory license or registration and requires that the renewal fee be paid during the 30-day period before the expiration of the license or registration. Existing law specifies that failure to pay the renewal fee results in forfeiture of the license or registration after a period of 60 days from the expiration date. This bill would require a licensee or registrant that fails to renew a license or registration before the expiration date to pay a specified delinquency fee for up to 60 days after the expiration date, in addition to the renewal fee. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 744?
- SB 744 is sponsored by Strickland, Tony (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 744?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 744?
- Track SB 744 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 744
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 744
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →