California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 R cosponsors

SB 744 — Clinical laboratories.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 201, Statutes of 2009.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law provides for the licensure, registration, and regulation of clinical laboratories and various clinical laboratory personnel by the State Department of Public Health and makes a violation of those provisions a crime. Existing law requires the department to deem certain laboratories accredited by private, nonprofit organizations as meeting state licensure or registration requirements if certain conditions are met. Under existing law, the private, nonprofit organization must, among other things, be approved by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) of the federal Department of Health and Human Services and must be approved by the department as having accreditation standards that are equal to, or more stringent than, state requirements for licensure or registration. The laboratory must meet the accreditation standards of that organization and must agree to permit the organization to provide records or other information to the department. This bill would require the private, nonprofit organization to be approved by the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services instead of HCFA, to conduct inspections of clinical laboratories in a manner that will determine compliance with existing law, as specified, and to provide the department with additional information including, among other things, a detailed description of the inspection process and a description of the process for monitoring proficiency testing performance. The bill would require the organization to be approved by the department as meeting these requirements and would require the department to begin accepting applications for approval by January 1, 2011. The bill would also require the laboratory to meet additional conditions, including authorizing the private, nonprofit organization to release specified proficiency testing results and notification of condition-level requirement violations or withdrawal of laboratory accreditation. The bill would prohibit the department from conducting routine inspections of laboratories receiving a certificate pursuant to these provisions. Existing law specifies various fees applicable to clinical laboratories and laboratory personnel and requires the deposit of those fees in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Fund. Existing law requires that, upon appropriation, moneys deposited in that fund be expended by the department to administer these provisions. Existing law requires the issuance of a separate license for each laboratory location, except as specified. Among other entities, not-for-profit, or federal, state, or local government laboratories engaging in limited public health testing are authorized to apply for a single license or registration, as specified. This bill would impose a fee for approval of each of those laboratories and would increase certain other fees applicable to laboratories and laboratory personnel. The bill would prohibit the fees imposed from exceeding the costs incurred by the department in regulating clinical laboratories and their personnel. The bill would require all interest earned on moneys deposited in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Fund to be maintained in the fund and would prohibit the redirection of moneys in the fund for any other purpose. The bill would require the department to report to the Legislature by July 1, 2013, on the extent to which the state clinical laboratory oversight program meets or exceeds federal standards, the extent to which the federal government is accepting exemption applications from states relative to federal CLIA oversight, and the potential cost to the state for an exemption. Existing law provides for the renewal of a clinical laboratory license or registration and requires that the renewal fee be paid during the 30-day period before the expiration of the license or registration. Existing law specifies that failure to pay the renewal fee results in forfeiture of the license or registration after a period of 60 days from the expiration date. This bill would require a licensee or registrant that fails to renew a license or registration before the expiration date to pay a specified delinquency fee for up to 60 days after the expiration date, in addition to the renewal fee. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 201, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2288.) To enrollment.

  5. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  6. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 70. Noes 3. Page 2936.) To Senate.

  7. Read second time. To third reading.

  8. (Received by Desk on August 28 pursuant to Joint Rule 61(a)(11).)

  9. (Heard in committee on August 27.)

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)

  11. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  12. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. (Heard in committee on July 7.)

  14. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)

  15. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  16. (Heard in committee on June 30.)

  17. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  18. To Coms. on B. & P. and HEALTH.

  19. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  20. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1094.) To Assembly.

  21. Read second time. To third reading.

  22. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 1026.)

  23. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  24. Set for hearing May 26.

  25. Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  26. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  27. Set for hearing May 18.

  28. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  29. Set for hearing May 11.

  30. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 676.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  31. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  32. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & E.D. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 557.)

  33. Set for hearing April 15.

  34. To Coms. on HEALTH and B., P. & E.D.

  35. Read first time.

  36. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.

  37. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 37001
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 40001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Yee — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Romero — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 81 Yea · 4 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 75406
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 81406
% of votes cast 89%4%0%7%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Not Voting
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Bill — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Coto — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Tom — Nay
Hall — Not Voting
Duvall — Not Voting
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Logue — Not Voting
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Not Voting
Harkey — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Knight — Nay
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torres — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 19001
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 21001
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hill — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Conway — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 23 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 21003
Republican 2000
Total 23003
% of votes cast 88%0%0%12%
How each member voted (26)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Audra — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Nava — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Conway — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Republican 0001
Total 10002
% of votes cast 83%0%0%17%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Conway — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 37000
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Yea
Leno — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 6 Yea · 1 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6104
Total 6104
% of votes cast 55%9%0%36%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Corbett — Not Voting
Negrete — Not Voting
Florez — Not Voting
McLeod — Not Voting
Romero — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Correa — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11000
Republican 1000
Total 12000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Cedillo — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cox — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Alquist — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 744 do?
(1) Existing law provides for the licensure, registration, and regulation of clinical laboratories and various clinical laboratory personnel by the State Department of Public Health and makes a violation of those provisions a crime. Existing law requires the department to deem certain laboratories accredited by private, nonprofit organizations as meeting state licensure or registration requirements if certain conditions are met. Under existing law, the private, nonprofit organization must, among other things, be approved by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) of the federal Department of Health and Human Services and must be approved by the department as having accreditation standards that are equal to, or more stringent than, state requirements for licensure or registration. The laboratory must meet the accreditation standards of that organization and must agree to permit the organization to provide records or other information to the department. This bill would require the private, nonprofit organization to be approved by the federal Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services instead of HCFA, to conduct inspections of clinical laboratories in a manner that will determine compliance with existing law, as specified, and to provide the department with additional information including, among other things, a detailed description of the inspection process and a description of the process for monitoring proficiency testing performance. The bill would require the organization to be approved by the department as meeting these requirements and would require the department to begin accepting applications for approval by January 1, 2011. The bill would also require the laboratory to meet additional conditions, including authorizing the private, nonprofit organization to release specified proficiency testing results and notification of condition-level requirement violations or withdrawal of laboratory accreditation. The bill would prohibit the department from conducting routine inspections of laboratories receiving a certificate pursuant to these provisions. Existing law specifies various fees applicable to clinical laboratories and laboratory personnel and requires the deposit of those fees in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Fund. Existing law requires that, upon appropriation, moneys deposited in that fund be expended by the department to administer these provisions. Existing law requires the issuance of a separate license for each laboratory location, except as specified. Among other entities, not-for-profit, or federal, state, or local government laboratories engaging in limited public health testing are authorized to apply for a single license or registration, as specified. This bill would impose a fee for approval of each of those laboratories and would increase certain other fees applicable to laboratories and laboratory personnel. The bill would prohibit the fees imposed from exceeding the costs incurred by the department in regulating clinical laboratories and their personnel. The bill would require all interest earned on moneys deposited in the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Fund to be maintained in the fund and would prohibit the redirection of moneys in the fund for any other purpose. The bill would require the department to report to the Legislature by July 1, 2013, on the extent to which the state clinical laboratory oversight program meets or exceeds federal standards, the extent to which the federal government is accepting exemption applications from states relative to federal CLIA oversight, and the potential cost to the state for an exemption. Existing law provides for the renewal of a clinical laboratory license or registration and requires that the renewal fee be paid during the 30-day period before the expiration of the license or registration. Existing law specifies that failure to pay the renewal fee results in forfeiture of the license or registration after a period of 60 days from the expiration date. This bill would require a licensee or registrant that fails to renew a license or registration before the expiration date to pay a specified delinquency fee for up to 60 days after the expiration date, in addition to the renewal fee. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 744?
SB 744 is sponsored by Strickland, Tony (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 744?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 744?
Track SB 744 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 744

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 744

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →