California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 D cosponsors

SB 1008 — Engineering and land surveying: limited liability partnerships.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 634, Statutes of 2010.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The Professional Engineers Act provides for the licensure and regulation of engineers and the Professional Land Surveyors' Act provides for the licensure and regulation of land surveyors by the Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors. Existing law provides for the formation of various types of legal entities, including registered limited liability partnerships and foreign limited liability partnerships. Under existing law, a registered limited liability partnership or a foreign limited liability partnership may only be formed by persons licensed to engage in the practice of accountancy, the practice of law, or, until January 1, 2012, the practice of architecture. This bill would authorize registered limited liability partnerships and foreign limited liability partnerships to be formed by persons licensed to engage in the practice of engineering or land surveying, and would provide that one or more engineers or land surveyors are not prohibited from practicing or offering to practice, within the scope of their licensure, as a limited liability partnership if specified requirements are met. Existing law requires that every registered limited liability partnership and foreign limited liability partnership provide specified security for claims arising out of the partnership's professional practice. Under existing law, the total aggregate limit of liability under the policy or policies of insurance or the amount of security required to be provided by those partnerships providing architectural services is $100,000 multiplied by the number of licensed persons, but not less than $1,000,000 and not more than $5,000,000, as specified. This bill would also impose those security requirements on a limited liability partnership and foreign limited liability partnership providing engineering or land surveying services, except that the amount of security required to be provided would be not less than $2,000,000. This bill would specify that its provisions shall become inoperative on January 1, 2016, unless a later enacted statute, enacted prior to that date, deletes or extends that date. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 634, Statutes of 2010.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 11:45 a.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4897.) To enrollment.

  5. Urgency clause adopted.

  6. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  7. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 6504.) To Senate.

  8. Read third time. Amended. (Page 6371.) To third reading.

  9. Read second time. To third reading.

  10. (Heard in committee August 12.)

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)

  12. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  13. Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 5989.)

  14. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. (Heard in committee on June 29.)

  16. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)

  17. (Heard in committee on June 22.)

  18. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  19. To Coms. on B.,P. & C.P. and JUD.

  20. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  21. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 3542.) To Assembly.

  22. To Special Consent Calendar.

  23. Read second time. To third reading.

  24. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  25. Set for hearing May 10.

  26. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  27. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3304.)

  28. Set for hearing April 20.

  29. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3069.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  30. Set for hearing April 5.

  31. Re-referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and JUD.

  32. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  33. To Com. on RLS.

  34. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 13.

  35. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33004
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 36004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 88 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 82002
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 88002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (90)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Huber — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Bass — Yea
Block — Yea
Coto — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Knight — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Silva — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Villines — Yea
Eng — Yea
Evans — Not Voting
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Not Voting
Garrick — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 18 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 18000
Total 18000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Conway — Yea
Coto — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Norby — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Davis — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31005
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 34005
% of votes cast 87%0%0%13%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Not Voting
Dutton — Yea
Price — Not Voting
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Aanestad — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Cedillo — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7002
Democratic 1000
Total 8002
% of votes cast 80%0%0%20%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
Florez — Not Voting
McLeod — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Walters — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1008 do?
The Professional Engineers Act provides for the licensure and regulation of engineers and the Professional Land Surveyors' Act provides for the licensure and regulation of land surveyors by the Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors. Existing law provides for the formation of various types of legal entities, including registered limited liability partnerships and foreign limited liability partnerships. Under existing law, a registered limited liability partnership or a foreign limited liability partnership may only be formed by persons licensed to engage in the practice of accountancy, the practice of law, or, until January 1, 2012, the practice of architecture. This bill would authorize registered limited liability partnerships and foreign limited liability partnerships to be formed by persons licensed to engage in the practice of engineering or land surveying, and would provide that one or more engineers or land surveyors are not prohibited from practicing or offering to practice, within the scope of their licensure, as a limited liability partnership if specified requirements are met. Existing law requires that every registered limited liability partnership and foreign limited liability partnership provide specified security for claims arising out of the partnership's professional practice. Under existing law, the total aggregate limit of liability under the policy or policies of insurance or the amount of security required to be provided by those partnerships providing architectural services is $100,000 multiplied by the number of licensed persons, but not less than $1,000,000 and not more than $5,000,000, as specified. This bill would also impose those security requirements on a limited liability partnership and foreign limited liability partnership providing engineering or land surveying services, except that the amount of security required to be provided would be not less than $2,000,000. This bill would specify that its provisions shall become inoperative on January 1, 2016, unless a later enacted statute, enacted prior to that date, deletes or extends that date. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 1008?
SB 1008 is sponsored by Padilla, Stephen C. (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 1008?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1008?
Track SB 1008 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1008

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1008

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →