California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 702 — Ancillary day care centers: employees: trustline providers.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 199, Statutes of 2009.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the California Child Day Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of child day care facilities by the State Department of Social Services. Under existing law, a violation of any of these provisions is punishable as a crime. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to establish a trustline registry and, upon submission of the trustline application and fingerprints, to enter into the trustline registry the provider's name, identification card number, and an indicator that the provider has submitted an application and fingerprints, who would be known as a "trustline applicant." This bill would, commencing January 1, 2011, define an ancillary day care center, and provide that a person who provides care or supervision in an ancillary day care center is a provider for purposes of the trustline registry provisions. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2011, require a person who provides child care or child care supervision in an ancillary day care center to register pursuant to these trustline provisions. Existing law authorizes the department to charge a fee to trustline applicants, as specified. Under existing law, moneys collected by the department to implement the trustline provisions are continuously appropriated to the department without regard to fiscal year for expenditure to implement the trustline provisions. This bill, notwithstanding the existing fee requirements, would require the department to charge a fee to each trustline applicant who provides care in an ancillary day care center, that is equal to the total amount required by the department to process applications and maintain the trustline registry for these providers. By increasing the funds appropriated to the department for purposes of the trustline registry, and creating a new purpose for their expenditure, this bill would make an appropriation. This bill would provide that no General Fund moneys would be used for the bill's implementation.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 199, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 5. Page 2383.) To enrollment.

  5. In Senate.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 61. Noes 16. Page 3189.) To Senate.

  7. Read second time. To third reading.

  8. Read second time. Amended. To second reading.

  9. (Heard in committee on August 27.)

  10. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 3.)

  11. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  12. (Heard in committee on June 30.)

  13. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. (Corrected June 29.)

  15. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  16. To Com. on HUM. S.

  17. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  18. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 4. Page 976.) To Assembly.

  19. Read second time. To third reading.

  20. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  21. Set for hearing May 18.

  22. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 700.)

  24. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  25. Set for hearing April 28.

  26. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  27. Set for hearing April 14.

  28. To Com. on HUMAN S.

  29. Read first time.

  30. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.

  31. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • DeSaulnier · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • DeSaulnier

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Supp 1 SB702 DeSaulnier

Passed 24 Yea · 5 Nay · 12 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 225011
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 245012
% of votes cast 59%12%0%29%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Huff — Not Voting
McLeod — Yea
Cogdill — Not Voting
Oropeza — Yea
Ducheny — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Not Voting
Benoit — Not Voting
Harman — Nay
Hollingsworth — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

SB 702 DeSaulnier Senate Third Reading By FUENTES

Passed 72 Yea · 17 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 671602
Democratic 3000
Republican 2100
Total 721702
% of votes cast 79%19%0%2%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Tom — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Bill — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Duvall — Not Voting
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Villines — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Knight — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 19 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 17300
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 19300
% of votes cast 86%14%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Conway — Nay
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Hill — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Senate 3rd Reading SB702 DeSaulnier

Passed 30 Yea · 4 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26406
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 30406
% of votes cast 75%10%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Wyland — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Oropeza — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Nay
Harman — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Romero — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety labor education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 702 do?
Existing law, the California Child Day Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of child day care facilities by the State Department of Social Services. Under existing law, a violation of any of these provisions is punishable as a crime. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to establish a trustline registry and, upon submission of the trustline application and fingerprints, to enter into the trustline registry the provider's name, identification card number, and an indicator that the provider has submitted an application and fingerprints, who would be known as a "trustline applicant." This bill would, commencing January 1, 2011, define an ancillary day care center, and provide that a person who provides care or supervision in an ancillary day care center is a provider for purposes of the trustline registry provisions. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2011, require a person who provides child care or child care supervision in an ancillary day care center to register pursuant to these trustline provisions. Existing law authorizes the department to charge a fee to trustline applicants, as specified. Under existing law, moneys collected by the department to implement the trustline provisions are continuously appropriated to the department without regard to fiscal year for expenditure to implement the trustline provisions. This bill, notwithstanding the existing fee requirements, would require the department to charge a fee to each trustline applicant who provides care in an ancillary day care center, that is equal to the total amount required by the department to process applications and maintain the trustline registry for these providers. By increasing the funds appropriated to the department for purposes of the trustline registry, and creating a new purpose for their expenditure, this bill would make an appropriation. This bill would provide that no General Fund moneys would be used for the bill's implementation.
Who sponsors SB 702?
SB 702 is sponsored by DeSaulnier.
What is the current status of SB 702?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 702?
Track SB 702 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 702

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 702

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →