Agricultural resources: grants.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1142 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1142.
You're tracking SB 1142
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1142 — Agricultural resources: grants.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 323, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Farmland Conservancy Program Act establishes a program for grants from the Department of Conservation for the acquisition of agricultural conservation easements or fee title. The act imposes requirements for the funding of agricultural conservation easements. The act creates the California Farmland Conservancy Program Fund. The moneys in the fund, upon appropriation, are required to be used for the purposes of the program, including the purchase of agricultural conservation easements. The act requires an applicant for an agricultural conservation easement to meet specified eligibility criteria related to commercial agricultural production and agricultural land conservation, and specifies criteria the Director of Conservation is required to consider in evaluating the proposal. This bill, notwithstanding any other provision of the act, would authorize the Director of Conservation to make grants from a source other than the fund, and, upon appropriation by the Legislature from that source, disburse moneys for those grants to an applicant for the acquisition of an agricultural conservation easement, if the director determines that the grant meets the purposes of the act and additional specified requirements, including that the easement does not, and will not, substantially prevent agricultural uses on the easement property and that any restriction on the current or reasonably foreseeable agricultural use of the easement property would only be imposed to restrict those areas of the property that are not in cultivation. Existing law also establishes the Soil Conservation Fund, which provides money, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for specified land use purposes. This bill would establish the Farm, Ranch, and Watershed Account within the Soil and Conservation Fund from which money would be disbursed to provide the above grants.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/27/10 - Chaptered Current pdf September 27, 2010
- Enrolled 08/31/10 - Enrolled pdf August 31, 2010
- Amended 08/18/10 - Amended Assembly pdf August 18, 2010
- Amended 08/02/10 - Amended Assembly pdf August 02, 2010
- Introduced 02/18/10 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2010
- SB1142 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 323, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 14. Page 4921.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 1. Page 6507.) To Senate.
-
Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Page 6352.)
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 6324.) To third reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(Heard in committee August 12.)
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 5989.)
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.)
-
(Heard in committee on June 21.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on AGRI. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
To Coms. on NAT. RES. and AGRI.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 3694.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3498.)
-
Set for hearing May 10.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 3307.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 19.
-
Joint Rule 61(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3209.)
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 21.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Set for hearing April 13.
-
To Com. on N.R. & W.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Blakeslee · Cosponsor
- Conway · Cosponsor
- Evans · Cosponsor
- Galgiani · Cosponsor
- Hill · Cosponsor
- Huffman · Cosponsor
- Ma · Cosponsor
- Monning · Cosponsor
- Pavley · Cosponsor
- Wiggins · Primary
- Yamada · Cosponsor
- Bill Berryhill · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wiggins
Co-sponsors (11)
- Blakeslee
- Conway
- Evans
- Galgiani
- Hill
- Huffman
- Ma
- Monning
- Pavley
- Yamada
- Bill Berryhill
Not signed on (110)
110 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 110 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 13 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 14 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 35% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 82 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 88 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 1% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (90)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 10 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 11 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 28% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 0% | 0% | 27% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1142 do?
- The California Farmland Conservancy Program Act establishes a program for grants from the Department of Conservation for the acquisition of agricultural conservation easements or fee title. The act imposes requirements for the funding of agricultural conservation easements. The act creates the California Farmland Conservancy Program Fund. The moneys in the fund, upon appropriation, are required to be used for the purposes of the program, including the purchase of agricultural conservation easements. The act requires an applicant for an agricultural conservation easement to meet specified eligibility criteria related to commercial agricultural production and agricultural land conservation, and specifies criteria the Director of Conservation is required to consider in evaluating the proposal. This bill, notwithstanding any other provision of the act, would authorize the Director of Conservation to make grants from a source other than the fund, and, upon appropriation by the Legislature from that source, disburse moneys for those grants to an applicant for the acquisition of an agricultural conservation easement, if the director determines that the grant meets the purposes of the act and additional specified requirements, including that the easement does not, and will not, substantially prevent agricultural uses on the easement property and that any restriction on the current or reasonably foreseeable agricultural use of the easement property would only be imposed to restrict those areas of the property that are not in cultivation. Existing law also establishes the Soil Conservation Fund, which provides money, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for specified land use purposes. This bill would establish the Farm, Ranch, and Watershed Account within the Soil and Conservation Fund from which money would be disbursed to provide the above grants.
- Who sponsors SB 1142?
- SB 1142 is sponsored by Blakeslee, Conway, Evans, Galgiani, Hill, Huffman, Ma, Monning, Pavley, Wiggins, Yamada, and Bill Berryhill.
- What is the current status of SB 1142?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1142?
- Track SB 1142 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1142
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1142
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →