California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 671 — Agricultural land: valuation.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 358, Statutes of 2009.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires the county assessor to assess current fair market valuations to determine the cancellation fee for removing land from a Williamson Act contract. Existing law permits the Department of Conservation or the landowner, if either believes that the current fair market valuations are inaccurate, to request formal review from the county assessor in the county considering the cancellation petition and authorizes the assessor to recover his or her reasonable costs of the formal review from the party requesting the review, as specified. This bill would authorize the assessor to require a deposit from the landowner to cover the contingency that payment of a cancellation fee will not necessarily result from the completion of a formal review, as specified.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 358, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.

  4. Ordered held in Engrossing and Enrolling.

  5. Returned by the Governor at the request of the Senate.

  6. Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.

  7. In Senate. To enrollment.

  8. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2617.) To Senate.

  9. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  10. (Heard in committee on July 15.)

  11. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)

  12. (Heard in committee on July 6.)

  13. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. (Heard in committee on June 17.)

  15. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  16. To Coms. on AGRI. and NAT. RES.

  17. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  18. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 901.) To Assembly.

  19. To Special Consent Calendar.

  20. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  21. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.

  22. Set for hearing May 4.

  23. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  24. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 498.)

  25. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  26. Set for hearing April 15.

  27. To Com. on L. GOV.

  28. Read first time.

  29. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.

  30. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Runner · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Runner

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SB 671 Runner Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session

Passed 88 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 82003
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 88003
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Tom — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Audra — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Bill — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Saldana — Not Voting
Cook — Not Voting
Bass — Yea
Smyth — Not Voting
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, to Consent Calendar.

Passed 21 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 19000
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 21000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Coto — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Miller — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Special Consent #4 SB671 Runner

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35001
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 39001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Yee — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Romero — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation agriculture
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 671 do?
Existing law requires the county assessor to assess current fair market valuations to determine the cancellation fee for removing land from a Williamson Act contract. Existing law permits the Department of Conservation or the landowner, if either believes that the current fair market valuations are inaccurate, to request formal review from the county assessor in the county considering the cancellation petition and authorizes the assessor to recover his or her reasonable costs of the formal review from the party requesting the review, as specified. This bill would authorize the assessor to require a deposit from the landowner to cover the contingency that payment of a cancellation fee will not necessarily result from the completion of a formal review, as specified.
Who sponsors SB 671?
SB 671 is sponsored by Runner.
What is the current status of SB 671?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 671?
Track SB 671 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 671

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 671

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →