California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

AB 975 — Water corporations: water meters.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 495, Statutes of 2009.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

The existing Water Measurement Law requires every water purveyor, as defined, who sells, leases, rents, furnishes, or delivers water service, as defined, for potable water, to any person, as defined, to require, as a condition of new water service, that a suitable water meter to measure the water service be installed, requires that the cost of installation of the meter be paid by the user of water, and authorizes the water purveyor to impose and collect charges for those costs. These requirements are not applicable to a community water system that serves fewer than 15 service connections used by yearlong residents or regularly serves fewer than 25 yearlong residents, or a single well that services the water supply of a single-family residential home. The Water Measurement Law contains additional requirements relative to the installation of water meters and charges for water relative to urban water suppliers, as defined. The Water Measurement Law authorizes a water purveyor, including an urban water supplier, to recover the cost of providing services related to the purchase, installation, and operation and maintenance of water meters from rates, fees, or charges. Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including water corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. The existing Public Utilities Act prohibits the commission from requiring certain water corporations, or a residential customer of those corporations, to install a water meter, except after a public hearing held within the service area of the water corporation at which hearing all of the following findings are made: (1) metering will be cost effective within the service area of the water corporation, (2) metering will result in a significant reduction in water consumption within the corporation's service area, and (3) the costs of metering will not impose an unreasonable financial burden on customers within the corporation's service territory, unless the commission finds metering is necessary to assure continuation of an adequate water supply within the service territory. This bill would repeal the existing limitation in the Public Utilities Act that limits the authority of the commission to require a water corporation to install water meters. The bill would require a water corporation with 500 or more service connections that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law to install a water meter on each new service connection and, by not later than January 1, 2025, to install a water meter upon each unmetered service connection, as provided. The bill would require a water corporation with less than 500 service connections as of January 1, 2010, that thereafter reaches 500 or more service connections and that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law, to install a water meter upon each unmetered service connection within 10 years after it reaches 500 or more service connections. The bill would require each water corporation that has installed water meters, or caused water meters to be installed, that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law, on and after January 1, 2015, to charge customers for potable water based on the actual volume of deliveries, as measured by the water meter, but would authorize the water corporation to delay imposition of volume-based water service charges for one annual billing cycle in order to provide customers with experience with those charges. The bill would require a water corporation to recover the cost of providing services related to the purchase, installation, operation, and maintenance of water meters in rates, fees, or charges, subject to existing law relative to approval of rates by the commission, and would require the commission to ensure that a water corporation complies with these requirements or the requirements of the Water Measurement Law. This bill would authorize the commission to require a water corporation that furnishes potable water for residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional use through less than 500 service connections that is not subject to specified requirements of Water Measurement Law, or a residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional customer of such corporation, to install a water meter at any water service connection between the water system of the corporation and the customer if after a public hearing held within the service area of the water corporation, and upon the commission finding, based upon the evidence presented at that hearing, that (1) metering will be cost effective within the service area of the corporation, (2) metering will result in a reduction in water consumption within the service area of the water corporation, or (3) the costs of metering will not impose an unreasonable financial burden on customers within the service area of the corporation unless it is found to be necessary to ensure continuation of an adequate water supply within the service area of the corporation. This bill would make a clarifying change to a provision of the Water Measurement Law. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order or decision of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 495, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 57. Noes 17. Page 3082.)

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 2970.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 4 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 15. Page 2066.)

  8. Read second time. To third reading.

  9. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  10. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (July 7).

  12. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  13. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.

  15. Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.

  16. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  17. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 24. Page 1720.)

  18. Action rescinded and record expunged whereby a final roll call vote was taken.

  19. Read second time. To third reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 13).

  21. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (April 28).

  22. Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. Read second time and amended.

  24. Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.

  25. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. Read second time and amended.

  26. Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.

  27. From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.

  28. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 67 Yea · 19 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 631705
Democratic 3000
Republican 1200
Total 671905
% of votes cast 74%21%0%5%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Yamada — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Coto — Yea
Tom — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Bill — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Huber — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Audra — Nay
Conway — Not Voting
Cook — Not Voting
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Duvall — Not Voting
Jeffries — Not Voting
Logue — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Silva — Nay
Tran — Nay
Adams — Nay
Anderson — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Villines — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 24 Yea · 15 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 221402
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 241502
% of votes cast 59%37%0%5%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Florez — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Runner — Nay
Harman — Nay
Huff — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Nay
Oropeza — Not Voting
Romero — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Not Voting
Denham — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 2000
Unaffiliated 6200
Republican 0100
Total 8300
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Lowenthal — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Benoit — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Wright — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Cox — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 63 Yea · 27 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 572502
Democratic 5000
Republican 1200
Total 632702
% of votes cast 68%29%0%2%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Charles — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Coto — Yea
Bill — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Gaines — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nava — Yea
Price — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Audra — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Miller — Nay
Silva — Nay
Torres — Not Voting
Tran — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Not Voting
Nielsen — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Nay
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 16 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15400
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 16500
% of votes cast 76%24%0%0%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Price — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 2 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10202
Democratic 3000
Total 13202
% of votes cast 76%12%0%12%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Fuller — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Tom — Not Voting
Berryhill — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 975 do?
The existing Water Measurement Law requires every water purveyor, as defined, who sells, leases, rents, furnishes, or delivers water service, as defined, for potable water, to any person, as defined, to require, as a condition of new water service, that a suitable water meter to measure the water service be installed, requires that the cost of installation of the meter be paid by the user of water, and authorizes the water purveyor to impose and collect charges for those costs. These requirements are not applicable to a community water system that serves fewer than 15 service connections used by yearlong residents or regularly serves fewer than 25 yearlong residents, or a single well that services the water supply of a single-family residential home. The Water Measurement Law contains additional requirements relative to the installation of water meters and charges for water relative to urban water suppliers, as defined. The Water Measurement Law authorizes a water purveyor, including an urban water supplier, to recover the cost of providing services related to the purchase, installation, and operation and maintenance of water meters from rates, fees, or charges. Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including water corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. The existing Public Utilities Act prohibits the commission from requiring certain water corporations, or a residential customer of those corporations, to install a water meter, except after a public hearing held within the service area of the water corporation at which hearing all of the following findings are made: (1) metering will be cost effective within the service area of the water corporation, (2) metering will result in a significant reduction in water consumption within the corporation's service area, and (3) the costs of metering will not impose an unreasonable financial burden on customers within the corporation's service territory, unless the commission finds metering is necessary to assure continuation of an adequate water supply within the service territory. This bill would repeal the existing limitation in the Public Utilities Act that limits the authority of the commission to require a water corporation to install water meters. The bill would require a water corporation with 500 or more service connections that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law to install a water meter on each new service connection and, by not later than January 1, 2025, to install a water meter upon each unmetered service connection, as provided. The bill would require a water corporation with less than 500 service connections as of January 1, 2010, that thereafter reaches 500 or more service connections and that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law, to install a water meter upon each unmetered service connection within 10 years after it reaches 500 or more service connections. The bill would require each water corporation that has installed water meters, or caused water meters to be installed, that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law, on and after January 1, 2015, to charge customers for potable water based on the actual volume of deliveries, as measured by the water meter, but would authorize the water corporation to delay imposition of volume-based water service charges for one annual billing cycle in order to provide customers with experience with those charges. The bill would require a water corporation to recover the cost of providing services related to the purchase, installation, operation, and maintenance of water meters in rates, fees, or charges, subject to existing law relative to approval of rates by the commission, and would require the commission to ensure that a water corporation complies with these requirements or the requirements of the Water Measurement Law. This bill would authorize the commission to require a water corporation that furnishes potable water for residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional use through less than 500 service connections that is not subject to specified requirements of Water Measurement Law, or a residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional customer of such corporation, to install a water meter at any water service connection between the water system of the corporation and the customer if after a public hearing held within the service area of the water corporation, and upon the commission finding, based upon the evidence presented at that hearing, that (1) metering will be cost effective within the service area of the corporation, (2) metering will result in a reduction in water consumption within the service area of the water corporation, or (3) the costs of metering will not impose an unreasonable financial burden on customers within the service area of the corporation unless it is found to be necessary to ensure continuation of an adequate water supply within the service area of the corporation. This bill would make a clarifying change to a provision of the Water Measurement Law. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order or decision of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 975?
AB 975 is sponsored by Fong, Mike (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 975?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 975?
Track AB 975 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 975

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 975

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →