AB 975 — Water corporations: water meters.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 495, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The existing Water Measurement Law requires every water purveyor, as defined, who sells, leases, rents, furnishes, or delivers water service, as defined, for potable water, to any person, as defined, to require, as a condition of new water service, that a suitable water meter to measure the water service be installed, requires that the cost of installation of the meter be paid by the user of water, and authorizes the water purveyor to impose and collect charges for those costs. These requirements are not applicable to a community water system that serves fewer than 15 service connections used by yearlong residents or regularly serves fewer than 25 yearlong residents, or a single well that services the water supply of a single-family residential home. The Water Measurement Law contains additional requirements relative to the installation of water meters and charges for water relative to urban water suppliers, as defined. The Water Measurement Law authorizes a water purveyor, including an urban water supplier, to recover the cost of providing services related to the purchase, installation, and operation and maintenance of water meters from rates, fees, or charges. Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including water corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. The existing Public Utilities Act prohibits the commission from requiring certain water corporations, or a residential customer of those corporations, to install a water meter, except after a public hearing held within the service area of the water corporation at which hearing all of the following findings are made: (1) metering will be cost effective within the service area of the water corporation, (2) metering will result in a significant reduction in water consumption within the corporation's service area, and (3) the costs of metering will not impose an unreasonable financial burden on customers within the corporation's service territory, unless the commission finds metering is necessary to assure continuation of an adequate water supply within the service territory. This bill would repeal the existing limitation in the Public Utilities Act that limits the authority of the commission to require a water corporation to install water meters. The bill would require a water corporation with 500 or more service connections that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law to install a water meter on each new service connection and, by not later than January 1, 2025, to install a water meter upon each unmetered service connection, as provided. The bill would require a water corporation with less than 500 service connections as of January 1, 2010, that thereafter reaches 500 or more service connections and that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law, to install a water meter upon each unmetered service connection within 10 years after it reaches 500 or more service connections. The bill would require each water corporation that has installed water meters, or caused water meters to be installed, that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law, on and after January 1, 2015, to charge customers for potable water based on the actual volume of deliveries, as measured by the water meter, but would authorize the water corporation to delay imposition of volume-based water service charges for one annual billing cycle in order to provide customers with experience with those charges. The bill would require a water corporation to recover the cost of providing services related to the purchase, installation, operation, and maintenance of water meters in rates, fees, or charges, subject to existing law relative to approval of rates by the commission, and would require the commission to ensure that a water corporation complies with these requirements or the requirements of the Water Measurement Law. This bill would authorize the commission to require a water corporation that furnishes potable water for residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional use through less than 500 service connections that is not subject to specified requirements of Water Measurement Law, or a residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional customer of such corporation, to install a water meter at any water service connection between the water system of the corporation and the customer if after a public hearing held within the service area of the water corporation, and upon the commission finding, based upon the evidence presented at that hearing, that (1) metering will be cost effective within the service area of the corporation, (2) metering will result in a reduction in water consumption within the service area of the water corporation, or (3) the costs of metering will not impose an unreasonable financial burden on customers within the service area of the corporation unless it is found to be necessary to ensure continuation of an adequate water supply within the service area of the corporation. This bill would make a clarifying change to a provision of the Water Measurement Law. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order or decision of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/10/09 - Enrolled pdf September 10, 2009
- Amended 07/15/09 - Amended Senate pdf July 15, 2009
- Amended 06/25/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 25, 2009
- Amended 04/22/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 22, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/26/09 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2009
- AB975 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 495, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 57. Noes 17. Page 3082.)
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 2970.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 4 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 15. Page 2066.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (July 7).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 24. Page 1720.)
-
Action rescinded and record expunged whereby a final roll call vote was taken.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 13).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (April 28).
-
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Mike Fong · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Fong, Mike Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 63 | 17 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 67 | 19 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 74% | 21% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 14 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 15 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 37% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 57 | 25 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 63 | 27 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 29% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 24% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 12% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 975 do?
- The existing Water Measurement Law requires every water purveyor, as defined, who sells, leases, rents, furnishes, or delivers water service, as defined, for potable water, to any person, as defined, to require, as a condition of new water service, that a suitable water meter to measure the water service be installed, requires that the cost of installation of the meter be paid by the user of water, and authorizes the water purveyor to impose and collect charges for those costs. These requirements are not applicable to a community water system that serves fewer than 15 service connections used by yearlong residents or regularly serves fewer than 25 yearlong residents, or a single well that services the water supply of a single-family residential home. The Water Measurement Law contains additional requirements relative to the installation of water meters and charges for water relative to urban water suppliers, as defined. The Water Measurement Law authorizes a water purveyor, including an urban water supplier, to recover the cost of providing services related to the purchase, installation, and operation and maintenance of water meters from rates, fees, or charges. Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including water corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. The existing Public Utilities Act prohibits the commission from requiring certain water corporations, or a residential customer of those corporations, to install a water meter, except after a public hearing held within the service area of the water corporation at which hearing all of the following findings are made: (1) metering will be cost effective within the service area of the water corporation, (2) metering will result in a significant reduction in water consumption within the corporation's service area, and (3) the costs of metering will not impose an unreasonable financial burden on customers within the corporation's service territory, unless the commission finds metering is necessary to assure continuation of an adequate water supply within the service territory. This bill would repeal the existing limitation in the Public Utilities Act that limits the authority of the commission to require a water corporation to install water meters. The bill would require a water corporation with 500 or more service connections that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law to install a water meter on each new service connection and, by not later than January 1, 2025, to install a water meter upon each unmetered service connection, as provided. The bill would require a water corporation with less than 500 service connections as of January 1, 2010, that thereafter reaches 500 or more service connections and that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law, to install a water meter upon each unmetered service connection within 10 years after it reaches 500 or more service connections. The bill would require each water corporation that has installed water meters, or caused water meters to be installed, that is not subject to specified requirements of the Water Measurement Law, on and after January 1, 2015, to charge customers for potable water based on the actual volume of deliveries, as measured by the water meter, but would authorize the water corporation to delay imposition of volume-based water service charges for one annual billing cycle in order to provide customers with experience with those charges. The bill would require a water corporation to recover the cost of providing services related to the purchase, installation, operation, and maintenance of water meters in rates, fees, or charges, subject to existing law relative to approval of rates by the commission, and would require the commission to ensure that a water corporation complies with these requirements or the requirements of the Water Measurement Law. This bill would authorize the commission to require a water corporation that furnishes potable water for residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional use through less than 500 service connections that is not subject to specified requirements of Water Measurement Law, or a residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional customer of such corporation, to install a water meter at any water service connection between the water system of the corporation and the customer if after a public hearing held within the service area of the water corporation, and upon the commission finding, based upon the evidence presented at that hearing, that (1) metering will be cost effective within the service area of the corporation, (2) metering will result in a reduction in water consumption within the service area of the water corporation, or (3) the costs of metering will not impose an unreasonable financial burden on customers within the service area of the corporation unless it is found to be necessary to ensure continuation of an adequate water supply within the service area of the corporation. This bill would make a clarifying change to a provision of the Water Measurement Law. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order or decision of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 975?
- AB 975 is sponsored by Fong, Mike (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 975?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 975?
- Track AB 975 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 975
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 975
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →