Children's services: high-risk children.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 244 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 244.
You're tracking SB 244
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 244 — Children's services: high-risk children.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to administer child care and development programs, including California state preschool programs, and requires applicants and contracting agencies to give first priority to children who meet specified criteria, including 3- or 4-year-old neglected or abused children who are the recipients of child protective services. This bill would also give first priority to neglected or abused children who are in family maintenance, family preservation, and unification, and to certain other high-risk children who meet specified criteria. The bill would give certain high-risk children the right to continuous enrollment in a state preschool program or a child care and development program that is licensed or is operated by a local educational agency if the child's residence or placement changes. Under existing law, a family is required to meet certain requirements to be eligible for federal and state subsidized child development programs, and requires certain children to be given first priority for those services. This bill would expand the eligibility requirements to include certain other high-risk children, and would also require first priority to be given to children from birth to 5 years of age who meet specified other requirements. The bill would require each county operating a state-funded child care and development program to annually inform the State Department of Education if the county does not provide information on child care and development programs, as specified. By imposing additional duties on local agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/22/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 22, 2010
- Amended 03/18/10 - Amended Assembly pdf March 18, 2010
- Amended 07/08/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 08, 2009
- Amended 06/01/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 01, 2009
- Amended 05/20/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 20, 2009
- Amended 05/04/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 04, 2009
- Amended 03/31/09 - Amended Senate pdf March 31, 2009
- Introduced 02/24/09 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2009
- SB244 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
From committee without further action.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RULES.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on ED. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
(Heard in committee May 20).
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and ED. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RULES.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.)
-
To Com. on HUM. S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 11. Page 1174.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 5. Page 1069.)
-
(Suspense - for vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 18.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 608.)
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 27.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Alquist · Cosponsor
- Hancock · Cosponsor
- Liu · Cosponsor
- Wright · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wright
Co-sponsors (3)
- Alquist
- Hancock
- Liu
Not signed on (118)
118 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 118 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 0% | 0% | 38% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 38% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 11% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 244 do?
- Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to administer child care and development programs, including California state preschool programs, and requires applicants and contracting agencies to give first priority to children who meet specified criteria, including 3- or 4-year-old neglected or abused children who are the recipients of child protective services. This bill would also give first priority to neglected or abused children who are in family maintenance, family preservation, and unification, and to certain other high-risk children who meet specified criteria. The bill would give certain high-risk children the right to continuous enrollment in a state preschool program or a child care and development program that is licensed or is operated by a local educational agency if the child's residence or placement changes. Under existing law, a family is required to meet certain requirements to be eligible for federal and state subsidized child development programs, and requires certain children to be given first priority for those services. This bill would expand the eligibility requirements to include certain other high-risk children, and would also require first priority to be given to children from birth to 5 years of age who meet specified other requirements. The bill would require each county operating a state-funded child care and development program to annually inform the State Department of Education if the county does not provide information on child care and development programs, as specified. By imposing additional duties on local agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 244?
- SB 244 is sponsored by Alquist, Hancock, Liu, and Wright.
- What is the current status of SB 244?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 244?
- Track SB 244 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 244
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 244
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →