SB 93 — Redevelopment: payment for land or buildings.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 555, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes a redevelopment agency, with the consent of the legislative body, to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned either within or without the project area if the legislative body makes specified determinations. These determinations by the agency and the local legislative body are final and conclusive. Existing law requires the agency, with respect to the financing, acquisition, or construction of a transportation, collection, and distribution system and related peripheral parking facilities, in a county with a population of 4 million persons or more, to enter into an agreement with the rapid transit district that includes the county, or a portion thereof, under which the rapid transit district is required to be given specified responsibilities. This bill would instead authorize a redevelopment agency, with the consent of the legislative body, to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is located inside or contiguous to, as defined, the project area if the legislative body makes specified determinations. The bill would delete the requirement that the agency, with respect to the financing, acquisition, or construction of a transportation, collection, and distribution system and related peripheral parking facilities, in a county with a population of 4 million persons or more, enter into an agreement with the rapid transit district that includes the county, or a portion thereof, under which the rapid transit district is required to be given specified responsibilities. The bill would authorize an agency to pay for all or part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is partially located in the project area, but extends beyond the project area's boundaries, if the legislative body makes specified determinations. The bill would also authorize an agency, with the consent of the legislative body, to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is located outside and not contiguous to the project area, but is located within the community, if the legislative body makes specified findings based on substantial evidence in the record. The bill would require an action to challenge these findings to be filed and served within 60 days after the date of the resolution containing the findings. The bill would prohibit an agency from paying for the normal maintenance or operations of buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements that are publicly owned. These provisions would not apply if the financing, construction, or installation of the land, buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements is an obligation of the agency under a contract existing on December 31, 2009, is specifically described in the implementation plan prepared by the agency as of July 1, 2009, pursuant to Section 33490, or is specifically provided for in the redevelopment plan as of December 31, 2009. The bill would also prohibit the agency and legislative body from authorizing or approving the settlement of specified judicial actions that contest the validity of the adoption or amendment of a redevelopment plan if the settlement requires the expenditure of funds outside the project area unless the agency and the legislative body have first held a public hearing on the proposed settlement, as specified. The bill would provide specified notice requirements and procedures for the public hearing, and require that copies of the proposed settlement be made available for public inspection and copying not later than the first date of publication of the public notice. (2) Existing law requires the legislative body to hold a public hearing before an agency commits to use the portion of taxes allocated to the agency for the payment of the principal of, and interest on, loans, moneys advanced to, or indebtedness incurred by the agency to finance, or refinance, the redevelopment project to instead pay all or part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any publicly owned building, other than parking facilities. Existing law also requires a summary to be available for public inspection and copying, at a cost not to exceed the cost of duplication, and the summary to include specified information. This bill would add to the specified information required to be included in the summary the facts supporting the findings required to be made by the legislative body in order for an agency to be authorized to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is located outside, and not contiguous to, the project area, but is located within the community.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/10/09 - Enrolled pdf September 10, 2009
- Amended 08/31/09 - Amended Assembly pdf August 31, 2009
- Amended 07/14/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 14, 2009
- Amended 07/01/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 01, 2009
- Amended 05/18/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 18, 2009
- Amended 04/28/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 28, 2009
- Amended 03/10/09 - Amended Senate pdf March 10, 2009
- Introduced 01/22/09 - Introduced pdf January 22, 2009
- SB93 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 555, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 10:30 a.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2284.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2884.) To Senate.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 2824.) To third reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
-
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
To Com. on L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 973.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read third time. Amended. To second reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read third time. Amended. To second reading.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 254.)
-
Set for hearing March 4.
-
To Com. on L. GOV.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after February 22.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Block · Cosponsor
- Kehoe · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Kehoe
Co-sponsors (1)
- Block
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 83 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 89 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Not Voting |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 93 do?
- (1) The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes a redevelopment agency, with the consent of the legislative body, to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned either within or without the project area if the legislative body makes specified determinations. These determinations by the agency and the local legislative body are final and conclusive. Existing law requires the agency, with respect to the financing, acquisition, or construction of a transportation, collection, and distribution system and related peripheral parking facilities, in a county with a population of 4 million persons or more, to enter into an agreement with the rapid transit district that includes the county, or a portion thereof, under which the rapid transit district is required to be given specified responsibilities. This bill would instead authorize a redevelopment agency, with the consent of the legislative body, to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is located inside or contiguous to, as defined, the project area if the legislative body makes specified determinations. The bill would delete the requirement that the agency, with respect to the financing, acquisition, or construction of a transportation, collection, and distribution system and related peripheral parking facilities, in a county with a population of 4 million persons or more, enter into an agreement with the rapid transit district that includes the county, or a portion thereof, under which the rapid transit district is required to be given specified responsibilities. The bill would authorize an agency to pay for all or part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is partially located in the project area, but extends beyond the project area's boundaries, if the legislative body makes specified determinations. The bill would also authorize an agency, with the consent of the legislative body, to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is located outside and not contiguous to the project area, but is located within the community, if the legislative body makes specified findings based on substantial evidence in the record. The bill would require an action to challenge these findings to be filed and served within 60 days after the date of the resolution containing the findings. The bill would prohibit an agency from paying for the normal maintenance or operations of buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements that are publicly owned. These provisions would not apply if the financing, construction, or installation of the land, buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements is an obligation of the agency under a contract existing on December 31, 2009, is specifically described in the implementation plan prepared by the agency as of July 1, 2009, pursuant to Section 33490, or is specifically provided for in the redevelopment plan as of December 31, 2009. The bill would also prohibit the agency and legislative body from authorizing or approving the settlement of specified judicial actions that contest the validity of the adoption or amendment of a redevelopment plan if the settlement requires the expenditure of funds outside the project area unless the agency and the legislative body have first held a public hearing on the proposed settlement, as specified. The bill would provide specified notice requirements and procedures for the public hearing, and require that copies of the proposed settlement be made available for public inspection and copying not later than the first date of publication of the public notice. (2) Existing law requires the legislative body to hold a public hearing before an agency commits to use the portion of taxes allocated to the agency for the payment of the principal of, and interest on, loans, moneys advanced to, or indebtedness incurred by the agency to finance, or refinance, the redevelopment project to instead pay all or part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any publicly owned building, other than parking facilities. Existing law also requires a summary to be available for public inspection and copying, at a cost not to exceed the cost of duplication, and the summary to include specified information. This bill would add to the specified information required to be included in the summary the facts supporting the findings required to be made by the legislative body in order for an agency to be authorized to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is located outside, and not contiguous to, the project area, but is located within the community.
- Who sponsors SB 93?
- SB 93 is sponsored by Block and Kehoe.
- What is the current status of SB 93?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 93?
- Track SB 93 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 93
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 93
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →