California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 93 — Redevelopment: payment for land or buildings.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 555, Statutes of 2009.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes a redevelopment agency, with the consent of the legislative body, to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned either within or without the project area if the legislative body makes specified determinations. These determinations by the agency and the local legislative body are final and conclusive. Existing law requires the agency, with respect to the financing, acquisition, or construction of a transportation, collection, and distribution system and related peripheral parking facilities, in a county with a population of 4 million persons or more, to enter into an agreement with the rapid transit district that includes the county, or a portion thereof, under which the rapid transit district is required to be given specified responsibilities. This bill would instead authorize a redevelopment agency, with the consent of the legislative body, to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is located inside or contiguous to, as defined, the project area if the legislative body makes specified determinations. The bill would delete the requirement that the agency, with respect to the financing, acquisition, or construction of a transportation, collection, and distribution system and related peripheral parking facilities, in a county with a population of 4 million persons or more, enter into an agreement with the rapid transit district that includes the county, or a portion thereof, under which the rapid transit district is required to be given specified responsibilities. The bill would authorize an agency to pay for all or part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is partially located in the project area, but extends beyond the project area's boundaries, if the legislative body makes specified determinations. The bill would also authorize an agency, with the consent of the legislative body, to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is located outside and not contiguous to the project area, but is located within the community, if the legislative body makes specified findings based on substantial evidence in the record. The bill would require an action to challenge these findings to be filed and served within 60 days after the date of the resolution containing the findings. The bill would prohibit an agency from paying for the normal maintenance or operations of buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements that are publicly owned. These provisions would not apply if the financing, construction, or installation of the land, buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements is an obligation of the agency under a contract existing on December 31, 2009, is specifically described in the implementation plan prepared by the agency as of July 1, 2009, pursuant to Section 33490, or is specifically provided for in the redevelopment plan as of December 31, 2009. The bill would also prohibit the agency and legislative body from authorizing or approving the settlement of specified judicial actions that contest the validity of the adoption or amendment of a redevelopment plan if the settlement requires the expenditure of funds outside the project area unless the agency and the legislative body have first held a public hearing on the proposed settlement, as specified. The bill would provide specified notice requirements and procedures for the public hearing, and require that copies of the proposed settlement be made available for public inspection and copying not later than the first date of publication of the public notice. (2) Existing law requires the legislative body to hold a public hearing before an agency commits to use the portion of taxes allocated to the agency for the payment of the principal of, and interest on, loans, moneys advanced to, or indebtedness incurred by the agency to finance, or refinance, the redevelopment project to instead pay all or part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any publicly owned building, other than parking facilities. Existing law also requires a summary to be available for public inspection and copying, at a cost not to exceed the cost of duplication, and the summary to include specified information. This bill would add to the specified information required to be included in the summary the facts supporting the findings required to be made by the legislative body in order for an agency to be authorized to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is located outside, and not contiguous to, the project area, but is located within the community.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 555, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 10:30 a.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2284.) To enrollment.

  5. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2884.) To Senate.

  7. Read third time. Amended. (Page 2824.) To third reading.

  8. Read second time. To third reading.

  9. Read second time. Amended. To second reading.

  10. (Heard in committee on July 8.)

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.)

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  13. To Com. on L. GOV.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 973.) To Assembly.

  16. Read second time. To third reading.

  17. Read third time. Amended. To second reading.

  18. Read second time. To third reading.

  19. Read third time. Amended. To second reading.

  20. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  21. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 254.)

  22. Set for hearing March 4.

  23. To Com. on L. GOV.

  24. From print. May be acted upon on or after February 22.

  25. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Block · Cosponsor
  • Kehoe · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Kehoe

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Block

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB93 Kehoe

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 37001
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 40001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Huff — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 89 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 83002
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 89002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hall — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Krekorian — Not Voting
Bass — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Ma — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Villines — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 2000
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
Knight — Yea
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31005
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 35005
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Cogdill — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Romero — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 5 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5000
Total 5000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (5)
Member Party Vote
Kehoe — Yea
Cox — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Wiggins — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 93 do?
(1) The Community Redevelopment Law authorizes a redevelopment agency, with the consent of the legislative body, to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned either within or without the project area if the legislative body makes specified determinations. These determinations by the agency and the local legislative body are final and conclusive. Existing law requires the agency, with respect to the financing, acquisition, or construction of a transportation, collection, and distribution system and related peripheral parking facilities, in a county with a population of 4 million persons or more, to enter into an agreement with the rapid transit district that includes the county, or a portion thereof, under which the rapid transit district is required to be given specified responsibilities. This bill would instead authorize a redevelopment agency, with the consent of the legislative body, to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is located inside or contiguous to, as defined, the project area if the legislative body makes specified determinations. The bill would delete the requirement that the agency, with respect to the financing, acquisition, or construction of a transportation, collection, and distribution system and related peripheral parking facilities, in a county with a population of 4 million persons or more, enter into an agreement with the rapid transit district that includes the county, or a portion thereof, under which the rapid transit district is required to be given specified responsibilities. The bill would authorize an agency to pay for all or part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is partially located in the project area, but extends beyond the project area's boundaries, if the legislative body makes specified determinations. The bill would also authorize an agency, with the consent of the legislative body, to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is located outside and not contiguous to the project area, but is located within the community, if the legislative body makes specified findings based on substantial evidence in the record. The bill would require an action to challenge these findings to be filed and served within 60 days after the date of the resolution containing the findings. The bill would prohibit an agency from paying for the normal maintenance or operations of buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements that are publicly owned. These provisions would not apply if the financing, construction, or installation of the land, buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements is an obligation of the agency under a contract existing on December 31, 2009, is specifically described in the implementation plan prepared by the agency as of July 1, 2009, pursuant to Section 33490, or is specifically provided for in the redevelopment plan as of December 31, 2009. The bill would also prohibit the agency and legislative body from authorizing or approving the settlement of specified judicial actions that contest the validity of the adoption or amendment of a redevelopment plan if the settlement requires the expenditure of funds outside the project area unless the agency and the legislative body have first held a public hearing on the proposed settlement, as specified. The bill would provide specified notice requirements and procedures for the public hearing, and require that copies of the proposed settlement be made available for public inspection and copying not later than the first date of publication of the public notice. (2) Existing law requires the legislative body to hold a public hearing before an agency commits to use the portion of taxes allocated to the agency for the payment of the principal of, and interest on, loans, moneys advanced to, or indebtedness incurred by the agency to finance, or refinance, the redevelopment project to instead pay all or part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any publicly owned building, other than parking facilities. Existing law also requires a summary to be available for public inspection and copying, at a cost not to exceed the cost of duplication, and the summary to include specified information. This bill would add to the specified information required to be included in the summary the facts supporting the findings required to be made by the legislative body in order for an agency to be authorized to pay all or a part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any building, facility, structure, or other improvement that is publicly owned and is located outside, and not contiguous to, the project area, but is located within the community.
Who sponsors SB 93?
SB 93 is sponsored by Block and Kehoe.
What is the current status of SB 93?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 93?
Track SB 93 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 93

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 93

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →