Local taxes: graffiti.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 138 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 138.
You're tracking SB 138
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 138 — Local taxes: graffiti.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a city or county, or city and county to levy a tax, as provided, on the sale at retail within its jurisdiction of aerosol paint containers, felt tip markers, as specified, and marking substances or instruments at the rate of no more than $0.10 per aerosol paint container or container of other marking substance, and no more than $0.05 per felt tip marker meeting specified requirements or other marking instrument. Existing law requires the State Board of Equalization to enforce and administer these provisions. This bill would increase the amount of the tax authorized to be levied under these provisions to $0.25 per aerosol paint container or felt tip marker meeting specified requirements, would revise the definition of an aerosol paint container, and would delete the authorization for the levy of a tax for containers of other marking instruments and other marking substances. The bill would also require any jurisdiction implementing the tax to provide retailers of products subject to the tax the option to store or display the products in an area continuously observable by employees, as specified, or in an area not accessible to the public without employee assistance.
Bill Text
- Amended 07/15/09 - Amended Assembly Current pdf July 15, 2009
- Amended 06/25/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 25, 2009
- Amended 06/16/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 16, 2009
- Amended 04/28/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 28, 2009
- Introduced 02/11/09 - Introduced pdf February 11, 2009
- SB138 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
From committee without further action.
-
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on July 6.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.)
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
To Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 17. Page 1145.) To Assembly.
-
(Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1009.)
-
Reconsideration granted.
-
Motion to reconsider made by Senator Liu.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 19. Noes 19. Page 1009.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 11.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 638.)
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
To Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 14.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Liu · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Liu
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 20% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 45% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 18 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 20 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 48% | 50% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Nay |
| Negrete | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Nay |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 25% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 138 do?
- Existing law authorizes a city or county, or city and county to levy a tax, as provided, on the sale at retail within its jurisdiction of aerosol paint containers, felt tip markers, as specified, and marking substances or instruments at the rate of no more than $0.10 per aerosol paint container or container of other marking substance, and no more than $0.05 per felt tip marker meeting specified requirements or other marking instrument. Existing law requires the State Board of Equalization to enforce and administer these provisions. This bill would increase the amount of the tax authorized to be levied under these provisions to $0.25 per aerosol paint container or felt tip marker meeting specified requirements, would revise the definition of an aerosol paint container, and would delete the authorization for the levy of a tax for containers of other marking instruments and other marking substances. The bill would also require any jurisdiction implementing the tax to provide retailers of products subject to the tax the option to store or display the products in an area continuously observable by employees, as specified, or in an area not accessible to the public without employee assistance.
- Who sponsors SB 138?
- SB 138 is sponsored by Liu.
- What is the current status of SB 138?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 138?
- Track SB 138 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 138
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 138
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →