Local agencies: spheres of influence.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1582 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1582.
You're tracking AB 1582
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1582 — Local agencies: spheres of influence.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 155, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 31, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires a Local Agency Formation Commission to develop and determine the sphere of influence of each local governmental agency within the county. A commission is authorized, at the time a commission approves a proposal for an incorporation or a reorganization which includes an incorporation, to determine the sphere of influence for the proposed new city. The commission is required to determine the sphere of influence for any newly incorporated city within one year of the effective date of incorporation. This bill would authorize a commission, beginning January 1, 2010, to determine the sphere of influence for a proposed new district, when a commission approves a formation or reorganization that includes the formation of a district. The commission would be required to determine the sphere of influence for any newly formed district within one year of the effective date of formation. (2) The Cortese‑Knox‑Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 governs the procedures for the formation and change of organization of cities and special districts. In the case of a petition for an annexation, a detachment, or a reorganization consisting solely of annexations or detachments, or both, signed by all of the landowners in the territory affected by the proposal, the commission may approve or disapprove the proposal without notice or hearing, if prescribed conditions are met. With respect to uninhabited territory, the commission may waive protest proceedings if all the owners of land have given written consent and no subject agency has submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest. This bill would, with respect to uninhabited territory, additionally permit the commission to waive protest proceedings in the case of private railroad companies, if no private railroad company owners of land have submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest before the conclusion of the commission hearing and no subject agency has submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest. (3) Existing law permits any owner of land or registered voter within inhabited territory proposed to be annexed or detached, or any owner of land within uninhabited territory proposed to be annexed or detached, to file a written protest against the annexation or detachment at any time prior to the conclusion of the noticed protest. The written protest is required to include the name and address of the owner of the land affected and the street address or other description sufficient to identify the location of the land or the name and address of the registered voter as it appears on the affidavit of registration. This bill would repeal the requirement that the written protest include that information and would instead require the written protest to contain the same information that is required in a petition that proposes a change or organization or reorganization. The bill would additionally require the commission to determine the value of written protests in accordance with those petition requirements, and would make other technical changes. (4) Existing law requires the expenses incurred in conducting elections for a change of organization or reorganization to be paid in a specified manner. This bill would make technical conforming changes to that provision.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 08/06/09 - Chaptered Current pdf August 06, 2009
- Enrolled 07/09/09 - Enrolled pdf July 09, 2009
- Amended 06/10/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 10, 2009
- Amended 05/06/09 - Amended Assembly pdf May 06, 2009
- Introduced 03/31/09 - Introduced pdf March 31, 2009
- AB1582 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 155, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2383.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1428.)
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (June 17).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1627.)
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 13).
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee May 1.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Local Government · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Local Government
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 83 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 89 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 81 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 89 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Not Voting |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1582 do?
- (1) Existing law requires a Local Agency Formation Commission to develop and determine the sphere of influence of each local governmental agency within the county. A commission is authorized, at the time a commission approves a proposal for an incorporation or a reorganization which includes an incorporation, to determine the sphere of influence for the proposed new city. The commission is required to determine the sphere of influence for any newly incorporated city within one year of the effective date of incorporation. This bill would authorize a commission, beginning January 1, 2010, to determine the sphere of influence for a proposed new district, when a commission approves a formation or reorganization that includes the formation of a district. The commission would be required to determine the sphere of influence for any newly formed district within one year of the effective date of formation. (2) The Cortese‑Knox‑Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 governs the procedures for the formation and change of organization of cities and special districts. In the case of a petition for an annexation, a detachment, or a reorganization consisting solely of annexations or detachments, or both, signed by all of the landowners in the territory affected by the proposal, the commission may approve or disapprove the proposal without notice or hearing, if prescribed conditions are met. With respect to uninhabited territory, the commission may waive protest proceedings if all the owners of land have given written consent and no subject agency has submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest. This bill would, with respect to uninhabited territory, additionally permit the commission to waive protest proceedings in the case of private railroad companies, if no private railroad company owners of land have submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest before the conclusion of the commission hearing and no subject agency has submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest. (3) Existing law permits any owner of land or registered voter within inhabited territory proposed to be annexed or detached, or any owner of land within uninhabited territory proposed to be annexed or detached, to file a written protest against the annexation or detachment at any time prior to the conclusion of the noticed protest. The written protest is required to include the name and address of the owner of the land affected and the street address or other description sufficient to identify the location of the land or the name and address of the registered voter as it appears on the affidavit of registration. This bill would repeal the requirement that the written protest include that information and would instead require the written protest to contain the same information that is required in a petition that proposes a change or organization or reorganization. The bill would additionally require the commission to determine the value of written protests in accordance with those petition requirements, and would make other technical changes. (4) Existing law requires the expenses incurred in conducting elections for a change of organization or reorganization to be paid in a specified manner. This bill would make technical conforming changes to that provision.
- Who sponsors AB 1582?
- AB 1582 is sponsored by Committee on Local Government.
- What is the current status of AB 1582?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 31, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1582?
- Track AB 1582 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1582
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1582
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →