California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1582 — Local agencies: spheres of influence.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 155, Statutes of 2009.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 31, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires a Local Agency Formation Commission to develop and determine the sphere of influence of each local governmental agency within the county. A commission is authorized, at the time a commission approves a proposal for an incorporation or a reorganization which includes an incorporation, to determine the sphere of influence for the proposed new city. The commission is required to determine the sphere of influence for any newly incorporated city within one year of the effective date of incorporation. This bill would authorize a commission, beginning January 1, 2010, to determine the sphere of influence for a proposed new district, when a commission approves a formation or reorganization that includes the formation of a district. The commission would be required to determine the sphere of influence for any newly formed district within one year of the effective date of formation. (2) The Cortese‑Knox‑Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 governs the procedures for the formation and change of organization of cities and special districts. In the case of a petition for an annexation, a detachment, or a reorganization consisting solely of annexations or detachments, or both, signed by all of the landowners in the territory affected by the proposal, the commission may approve or disapprove the proposal without notice or hearing, if prescribed conditions are met. With respect to uninhabited territory, the commission may waive protest proceedings if all the owners of land have given written consent and no subject agency has submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest. This bill would, with respect to uninhabited territory, additionally permit the commission to waive protest proceedings in the case of private railroad companies, if no private railroad company owners of land have submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest before the conclusion of the commission hearing and no subject agency has submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest. (3) Existing law permits any owner of land or registered voter within inhabited territory proposed to be annexed or detached, or any owner of land within uninhabited territory proposed to be annexed or detached, to file a written protest against the annexation or detachment at any time prior to the conclusion of the noticed protest. The written protest is required to include the name and address of the owner of the land affected and the street address or other description sufficient to identify the location of the land or the name and address of the registered voter as it appears on the affidavit of registration. This bill would repeal the requirement that the written protest include that information and would instead require the written protest to contain the same information that is required in a petition that proposes a change or organization or reorganization. The bill would additionally require the commission to determine the value of written protests in accordance with those petition requirements, and would make other technical changes. (4) Existing law requires the expenses incurred in conducting elections for a change of organization or reorganization to be paid in a specified manner. This bill would make technical conforming changes to that provision.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 155, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 2:30 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2383.)

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1428.)

  7. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  8. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (June 17).

  9. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  10. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  11. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  12. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1627.)

  13. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  14. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 13).

  15. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  16. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.

  17. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  18. From printer. May be heard in committee May 1.

  19. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Local Government · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Local Government

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 89 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 83002
Republican 3000
Democratic 3000
Total 89002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bass — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Nielsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 41 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 38000
Republican 1000
Democratic 2000
Total 41000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 89 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 81003
Democratic 5000
Republican 3000
Total 89003
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Bill — Yea
Berryhill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Berryhill — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Charles — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Gaines — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Audra — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Saldana — Not Voting
Fuentes — Not Voting
Bass — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Price — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Huber — Yea
Knight — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Not Voting
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1582 do?
(1) Existing law requires a Local Agency Formation Commission to develop and determine the sphere of influence of each local governmental agency within the county. A commission is authorized, at the time a commission approves a proposal for an incorporation or a reorganization which includes an incorporation, to determine the sphere of influence for the proposed new city. The commission is required to determine the sphere of influence for any newly incorporated city within one year of the effective date of incorporation. This bill would authorize a commission, beginning January 1, 2010, to determine the sphere of influence for a proposed new district, when a commission approves a formation or reorganization that includes the formation of a district. The commission would be required to determine the sphere of influence for any newly formed district within one year of the effective date of formation. (2) The Cortese‑Knox‑Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 governs the procedures for the formation and change of organization of cities and special districts. In the case of a petition for an annexation, a detachment, or a reorganization consisting solely of annexations or detachments, or both, signed by all of the landowners in the territory affected by the proposal, the commission may approve or disapprove the proposal without notice or hearing, if prescribed conditions are met. With respect to uninhabited territory, the commission may waive protest proceedings if all the owners of land have given written consent and no subject agency has submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest. This bill would, with respect to uninhabited territory, additionally permit the commission to waive protest proceedings in the case of private railroad companies, if no private railroad company owners of land have submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest before the conclusion of the commission hearing and no subject agency has submitted written opposition to a waiver of protest. (3) Existing law permits any owner of land or registered voter within inhabited territory proposed to be annexed or detached, or any owner of land within uninhabited territory proposed to be annexed or detached, to file a written protest against the annexation or detachment at any time prior to the conclusion of the noticed protest. The written protest is required to include the name and address of the owner of the land affected and the street address or other description sufficient to identify the location of the land or the name and address of the registered voter as it appears on the affidavit of registration. This bill would repeal the requirement that the written protest include that information and would instead require the written protest to contain the same information that is required in a petition that proposes a change or organization or reorganization. The bill would additionally require the commission to determine the value of written protests in accordance with those petition requirements, and would make other technical changes. (4) Existing law requires the expenses incurred in conducting elections for a change of organization or reorganization to be paid in a specified manner. This bill would make technical conforming changes to that provision.
Who sponsors AB 1582?
AB 1582 is sponsored by Committee on Local Government.
What is the current status of AB 1582?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 31, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1582?
Track AB 1582 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1582

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1582

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →