California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 1174 — Land use: general plan: Future Sustainable Communities Pilot Project.

Last action — From Assembly without further action.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The Planning and Zoning Law requires a city or county to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the city or county and of any land outside its boundaries that bears relation to its planning. That law also requires the general plan to contain specified mandatory elements, including, among others, a housing element for the preservation, improvement, and development of the community's housing. Existing law requires the Strategic Growth Council to manage and award financial assistance to specified regional and local governments to support the planning and development of sustainable communities, as specified, from bond funds made available through the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006. This bill would establish the Future Sustainable Communities Pilot Project. The bill would authorize a city or county with a disadvantaged unincorporated community, as defined, inside or near its boundaries to apply to the Strategic Growth Council, as specified, to receive the financial assistance necessary to update its general plan to facilitate the transformation of the disadvantaged unincorporated community into a sustainable community. The bill would require the Strategic Growth Council to choose 5 cities and 5 counties with a disadvantaged unincorporated community inside or near their boundaries to receive financial assistance. The bill would require, upon receipt of the financial assistance from the council, the city or county to review, prepare, and adopt amendments to one or more elements of its general plan, as necessary to include data and analysis, goals, implementation measures, policies, and objectives to address the presence of unincorporated island, unincorporated fringe, or unincorporated legacy communities, as respectively defined, inside or near its boundaries, and to incorporate into the general plan specified purposes relating to the establishment of sustainable communities. The bill would also require the updated general plan to include specified information. This bill would further require the city or county to make a diligent effort to involve all members of the public in preparing the review and update of the general plan.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Assembly without further action.

  2. From committee without further action.

  3. Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.

  4. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  5. (Heard in committee on June 30.)

  6. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  7. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  8. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  9. To Com. on L. GOV.

  10. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  11. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 3738.) To Assembly.

  12. Read second time. To third reading.

  13. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 3498.)

  14. Set for hearing May 10.

  15. Hearing postponed by committee.

  16. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  17. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. Set for hearing May 3.

  19. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 3307.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Set for hearing April 19.

  21. Joint Rule 61(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3209.)

  22. Hearing postponed by committee.

  23. (April 13 amended version corrected April 20.)

  24. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  25. Set for hearing April 21.

  26. To Com. on L. GOV.

  27. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  28. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Price · Cosponsor
  • Wolk · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Wolk

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Price

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Senate 3rd Reading SB1174 Wolk

Passed 23 Yea · 14 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211302
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 231402
% of votes cast 59%36%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Nay
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Correa — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 6 Yea · 3 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6302
Total 6302
% of votes cast 55%27%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Corbett — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wyland — Nay
Cox — Nay
Denham — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety housing environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1174 do?
The Planning and Zoning Law requires a city or county to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the city or county and of any land outside its boundaries that bears relation to its planning. That law also requires the general plan to contain specified mandatory elements, including, among others, a housing element for the preservation, improvement, and development of the community's housing. Existing law requires the Strategic Growth Council to manage and award financial assistance to specified regional and local governments to support the planning and development of sustainable communities, as specified, from bond funds made available through the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006. This bill would establish the Future Sustainable Communities Pilot Project. The bill would authorize a city or county with a disadvantaged unincorporated community, as defined, inside or near its boundaries to apply to the Strategic Growth Council, as specified, to receive the financial assistance necessary to update its general plan to facilitate the transformation of the disadvantaged unincorporated community into a sustainable community. The bill would require the Strategic Growth Council to choose 5 cities and 5 counties with a disadvantaged unincorporated community inside or near their boundaries to receive financial assistance. The bill would require, upon receipt of the financial assistance from the council, the city or county to review, prepare, and adopt amendments to one or more elements of its general plan, as necessary to include data and analysis, goals, implementation measures, policies, and objectives to address the presence of unincorporated island, unincorporated fringe, or unincorporated legacy communities, as respectively defined, inside or near its boundaries, and to incorporate into the general plan specified purposes relating to the establishment of sustainable communities. The bill would also require the updated general plan to include specified information. This bill would further require the city or county to make a diligent effort to involve all members of the public in preparing the review and update of the general plan.
Who sponsors SB 1174?
SB 1174 is sponsored by Price and Wolk.
What is the current status of SB 1174?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1174?
Track SB 1174 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1174

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1174

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →