California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 2702 — Developmental services: planning teams.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the California Early Intervention Services Act, provides a statewide system of coordinated, comprehensive, family-centered, multidisciplinary, and interagency programs that are responsible for providing appropriate early intervention services and support to all eligible infants and toddlers, as defined, and their families and requires an eligible infant or toddler receiving services under the act to have an individualized family service plan (IFSP) . Under existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, the State Department of Developmental Services is responsible for providing various services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities, and for ensuring the appropriateness and quality of those services and supports. Under existing law, the department contracts with regional centers to provide services and supports to persons with developmental disabilities. The services and supports to be provided to a regional center consumer are contained in an individual program plan (IPP) , developed in accordance with prescribed requirements. Under existing law, development and monitoring of IFSPs and IPPs is done by planning teams, as defined, that include specified participants. Existing law requires the final decision regarding a consumer's IPP or IFSP to be made pursuant to the relevant statute. This bill would, instead, require a regional center to ensure, at the time of the development, scheduled review, or modification of an IFSP or IPP, that all decisions pertaining to the purchase and provision of services to that consumer are made pursuant to the relevant statutes.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. In committee: Held under submission.

  3. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.

  5. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  6. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 22).

  7. Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  8. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  9. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 65. Noes 7. Page 5138.)

  10. Read second time. To third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 5).

  12. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. Read second time and amended.

  14. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 13).

  15. Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  16. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.

  17. Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  18. Read first time.

  19. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  20. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Chesbro · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Chesbro

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Leno — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

AB 2702 CHESBRO Assembly Third Reading

Passed 76 Yea · 8 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71806
Democratic 2001
Republican 3000
Total 76807
% of votes cast 84%9%0%8%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Tom — Yea
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Charles — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Adams — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Davis — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Yea
Perez — Yea
Bill — Nay
Hagman — Not Voting
Jeffries — Not Voting
Anderson — Nay
Miller — Not Voting
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Not Voting
Silva — Not Voting
Skinner — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Knight — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Feuer — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 14 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13005
Democratic 1000
Total 14005
% of votes cast 74%0%0%26%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hall — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Coto — Yea
Norby — Not Voting
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Miller — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

healthcare labor education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2702 do?
Existing law, the California Early Intervention Services Act, provides a statewide system of coordinated, comprehensive, family-centered, multidisciplinary, and interagency programs that are responsible for providing appropriate early intervention services and support to all eligible infants and toddlers, as defined, and their families and requires an eligible infant or toddler receiving services under the act to have an individualized family service plan (IFSP) . Under existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, the State Department of Developmental Services is responsible for providing various services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities, and for ensuring the appropriateness and quality of those services and supports. Under existing law, the department contracts with regional centers to provide services and supports to persons with developmental disabilities. The services and supports to be provided to a regional center consumer are contained in an individual program plan (IPP) , developed in accordance with prescribed requirements. Under existing law, development and monitoring of IFSPs and IPPs is done by planning teams, as defined, that include specified participants. Existing law requires the final decision regarding a consumer's IPP or IFSP to be made pursuant to the relevant statute. This bill would, instead, require a regional center to ensure, at the time of the development, scheduled review, or modification of an IFSP or IPP, that all decisions pertaining to the purchase and provision of services to that consumer are made pursuant to the relevant statutes.
Who sponsors AB 2702?
AB 2702 is sponsored by Chesbro.
What is the current status of AB 2702?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2702?
Track AB 2702 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2702

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2702

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →