California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 382 — Agricultural burning: consistency with no burn days.

Last action — Stricken from Senate file.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency charged with coordinating efforts to attain and maintain ambient air quality standards. Existing law designates the state board as the state agency with the primary responsibility for the control of vehicular air pollution, and air pollution control districts and air quality management districts with the primary responsibility for the control of air pollution from all sources other than vehicular sources. Existing law prohibits agricultural burning, as defined, unless a valid permit has been issued from an agency designated by the state board. Existing law allows the state board to determine days when agricultural burning will be prohibited in any particular air basin. Even when issued, existing law provides that agricultural burn permits are not valid on days during which agricultural burning has been prohibited by the state board. Existing law requires the state board, in consultation with the districts, to identify, develop, and adopt a list of the most cost-effective measures that could be employed by the state board and the districts to reduce emissions of particulate matter from area sources, including emissions from woodstoves and fireplaces. Currently, the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District has adopted a rule implementing episodic wood burning curtailment which prohibits the operation of wood burning fireplaces and heaters on certain days. This bill would provide that an agricultural burn permit for burning within the jurisdiction of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District is invalid on days in which the district prohibition on the operation of wood burning devices is in effect. This bill would require all permits issued within the district to contain a warning regarding this provision. This bill would prohibit the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District from making any rules that would enable any person to burn agricultural waste on any day during which any program operated by the district has prohibited the operation of a wood burning device.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Stricken from Senate file.

  2. In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)

  3. Vetoed by Governor.

  4. Enrolled. To Governor at 9 p.m.

  5. In Senate. To enrollment.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 47. Noes 30. Page 2938.) To Senate.

  7. Read second time. To third reading.

  8. (Heard in committee on July 6.)

  9. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.)

  10. To Com. on NAT. RES.

  11. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  12. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 14. Page 891.) To Assembly.

  13. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  14. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 754.)

  15. Set for hearing May 4.

  16. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on EQ. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 582.) Re-referred to Com. on EQ.

  17. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on F. & A.

  18. Set for hearing April 21.

  19. To Coms. on F. & A. and EQ.

  20. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 28.

  21. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Florez · Primary
  • Pavley · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Florez

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Pavley

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SB 382 Florez Senate Third Reading By ARAMBULA

Passed 56 Yea · 33 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 523102
Democratic 3000
Republican 1200
Total 563302
% of votes cast 62%36%0%2%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Coto — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Block — Yea
Davis — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Conway — Nay
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Cook — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Not Voting
Jeffries — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Tran — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Knight — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Eng — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gilmore — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 6 Yea · 3 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6301
Total 6301
% of votes cast 60%30%0%10%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Chesbro — Not Voting
Logue — Nay
Brownley — Yea
Hill — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Gilmore — Nay

Official roll call →

Senate 3rd Reading SB382 Florez

Passed 24 Yea · 14 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211302
Democratic 3000
Republican 0100
Total 241402
% of votes cast 60%35%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Florez — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Wyland — Nay
Runner — Nay
Harman — Nay
Cogdill — Nay
Huff — Nay
McLeod — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Cox — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 5 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 1000
Unaffiliated 4200
Total 5200
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Runner — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Simitian — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

environment agriculture
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 382 do?
Existing law designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency charged with coordinating efforts to attain and maintain ambient air quality standards. Existing law designates the state board as the state agency with the primary responsibility for the control of vehicular air pollution, and air pollution control districts and air quality management districts with the primary responsibility for the control of air pollution from all sources other than vehicular sources. Existing law prohibits agricultural burning, as defined, unless a valid permit has been issued from an agency designated by the state board. Existing law allows the state board to determine days when agricultural burning will be prohibited in any particular air basin. Even when issued, existing law provides that agricultural burn permits are not valid on days during which agricultural burning has been prohibited by the state board. Existing law requires the state board, in consultation with the districts, to identify, develop, and adopt a list of the most cost-effective measures that could be employed by the state board and the districts to reduce emissions of particulate matter from area sources, including emissions from woodstoves and fireplaces. Currently, the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District has adopted a rule implementing episodic wood burning curtailment which prohibits the operation of wood burning fireplaces and heaters on certain days. This bill would provide that an agricultural burn permit for burning within the jurisdiction of the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District is invalid on days in which the district prohibition on the operation of wood burning devices is in effect. This bill would require all permits issued within the district to contain a warning regarding this provision. This bill would prohibit the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District from making any rules that would enable any person to burn agricultural waste on any day during which any program operated by the district has prohibited the operation of a wood burning device.
Who sponsors SB 382?
SB 382 is sponsored by Florez and Pavley.
What is the current status of SB 382?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 382?
Track SB 382 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 382

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 382

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →