California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 1741 — Low-performing schools: English learners.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, county superintendent of schools, or the governing body of a charter school or its equivalent to implement one of 4 specified intervention options for schools identified by the Superintendent of Public Instruction as persistently lowest-achieving, as specified. Existing law establishes the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program, which is a voluntary program in which underperforming schools may participate for the purpose of improving pupil achievement. This bill would require that if a school district or charter school authorizer intervenes to turn around a persistently lowest-achieving school, including a charter school, as specified, or if a school, including a charter school, is eligible to be included in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program, and that school has pupils who are English learners, the school district or authorizer take certain actions relating to the provision of services for English learners. The bill also would include a legislative finding and declaration that a school may already have satisfied the requirements specified in the bill by completing and obtaining approval of a school plan, as specified, for purposes of allocating economic impact aid funds. Because the bill would increase the duties of school districts, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) <xhtml:span class="EnSpace"/></xhtml:p>"?>(2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  3. (Ayes 21. Noes 13. Page 5023.)

  4. Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended.

  5. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  6. Read second time. To third reading.

  7. Read third time, amended. To second reading.

  8. Read second time. To third reading.

  9. Withdrawn from committee. Ordered placed on second reading file.

  10. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 23).

  12. Referred to Com. on ED.

  13. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  14. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 5141.)

  15. Read second time. To third reading.

  16. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 5).

  17. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  19. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  20. Read second time and amended.

  21. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 7).

  22. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  24. Referred to Com. on ED.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.

  26. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Coto · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Coto

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 1741 COTO Assembly Third Reading

Passed 58 Yea · 30 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 552802
Democratic 2001
Republican 1200
Total 583003
% of votes cast 64%33%0%3%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Cook — Nay
Coto — Yea
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Davis — Yea
Nava — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Norby — Nay
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Not Voting
Smyth — Nay
Tran — Nay
Villines — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Eng — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 14 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13500
Democratic 1000
Total 14500
% of votes cast 74%26%0%0%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Ammiano — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Conway — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

civil-rights education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1741 do?
(1) Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, county superintendent of schools, or the governing body of a charter school or its equivalent to implement one of 4 specified intervention options for schools identified by the Superintendent of Public Instruction as persistently lowest-achieving, as specified. Existing law establishes the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program, which is a voluntary program in which underperforming schools may participate for the purpose of improving pupil achievement. This bill would require that if a school district or charter school authorizer intervenes to turn around a persistently lowest-achieving school, including a charter school, as specified, or if a school, including a charter school, is eligible to be included in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program, and that school has pupils who are English learners, the school district or authorizer take certain actions relating to the provision of services for English learners. The bill also would include a legislative finding and declaration that a school may already have satisfied the requirements specified in the bill by completing and obtaining approval of a school plan, as specified, for purposes of allocating economic impact aid funds. Because the bill would increase the duties of school districts, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) <xhtml:span class="EnSpace"/></xhtml:p>"?>(2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 1741?
AB 1741 is sponsored by Coto.
What is the current status of AB 1741?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1741?
Track AB 1741 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1741

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1741

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →