California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 1322 — Food Stamp Employment and Training program.

Last action — Died on file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing federal law provides for the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) , known in California as the Food Stamp Program, under which food stamps allocated to the state by the federal government are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Existing federal law requires all food stamp recipients, unless otherwise exempt, between 15 to 60 years of age, inclusive, who are physically and mentally fit, to register for employment and participate in the Food Stamp Employment and Training (FSET) program. This bill would require a county that elects to participate in the FSET program to screen food stamp work registrants to determine whether they will participate in, or be deferred from, the FSET program, and would describe the criteria for deferral. The bill would authorize a food stamp work registrant who is deferred from mandatory participation in FSET to request to enroll in the program as a voluntary participant. The bill would require a county that participates in the FSET program to screen work registrants to determine whether they will participate in, or be deferred from, the FSET program, and would authorize a deferred work registrant to request to enroll in the FSET program as a voluntary participant. The bill would defer an individual from mandatory placement in the FSET program under designated circumstances. This bill, commencing October 1, 2011, would require a county that elects to participate in the FSET program to allow work registrants who are mandatorily placed in the program to meet the work requirements of the mandatory placement through self-initiated workfare, as defined. This bill would require a county that elects to participate in the FSET program to demonstrate in its FSET plan how it is effectively using FSET funds, as specified, but would not be construed to require a county to offer a particular component as part of its FSET plan. The bill would impose specified requirements on these counties with respect to the use of FSET and other federal funds and the implementation of FSET and other workfare programs. This bill would provide that it would not require a county to provide for workers' compensation coverage for an FSET participant who elects to participate in self-initiated workfare, as specified. This bill would require the department to adopt implementing regulations by October 1, 2012.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Died on file.

  2. In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)

  3. Vetoed by Governor.

  4. Enrolled. To Governor at 3 p.m.

  5. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4901.) To enrollment.

  6. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 58. Noes 16. Page 6512.) To Senate.

  8. Read second time. To third reading.

  9. Read second time. Amended. To second reading.

  10. (Heard in committee August 12.)

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)

  12. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. (Heard in committee on June 29.)

  15. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. To Com. on HUM. S.

  17. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  18. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 3735.) To Assembly.

  19. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3675.)

  21. (Suspense - for vote only.)

  22. Set for hearing May 27.

  23. Placed on APPR suspense file.

  24. Set for hearing May 17.

  25. Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  26. Set for hearing May 10.

  27. Hearing postponed by committee.

  28. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  29. Set for hearing May 3.

  30. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  31. Set for hearing April 26.

  32. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 3162.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  33. Set for hearing April 13.

  34. (March 22 amended version corrected March 23.)

  35. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  36. To Com. on HUMAN S.

  37. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 22.

  38. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Liu · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Liu

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32005
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 35005
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Oropeza — Not Voting
Steinberg — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Not Voting
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 69 Yea · 17 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 641604
Democratic 3000
Republican 2100
Total 691704
% of votes cast 77%19%0%4%
How each member voted (90)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
La — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bill — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Coto — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Conway — Nay
Tom — Nay
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Furutani — Not Voting
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Yea
Adams — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Not Voting
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Yea
Cook — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13500
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Conway — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Miller — Nay
Norby — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Gatto — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 34002
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 37002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Florez — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Leno — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Not Voting
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Price — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Cox — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1322 do?
Existing federal law provides for the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) , known in California as the Food Stamp Program, under which food stamps allocated to the state by the federal government are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Existing federal law requires all food stamp recipients, unless otherwise exempt, between 15 to 60 years of age, inclusive, who are physically and mentally fit, to register for employment and participate in the Food Stamp Employment and Training (FSET) program. This bill would require a county that elects to participate in the FSET program to screen food stamp work registrants to determine whether they will participate in, or be deferred from, the FSET program, and would describe the criteria for deferral. The bill would authorize a food stamp work registrant who is deferred from mandatory participation in FSET to request to enroll in the program as a voluntary participant. The bill would require a county that participates in the FSET program to screen work registrants to determine whether they will participate in, or be deferred from, the FSET program, and would authorize a deferred work registrant to request to enroll in the FSET program as a voluntary participant. The bill would defer an individual from mandatory placement in the FSET program under designated circumstances. This bill, commencing October 1, 2011, would require a county that elects to participate in the FSET program to allow work registrants who are mandatorily placed in the program to meet the work requirements of the mandatory placement through self-initiated workfare, as defined. This bill would require a county that elects to participate in the FSET program to demonstrate in its FSET plan how it is effectively using FSET funds, as specified, but would not be construed to require a county to offer a particular component as part of its FSET plan. The bill would impose specified requirements on these counties with respect to the use of FSET and other federal funds and the implementation of FSET and other workfare programs. This bill would provide that it would not require a county to provide for workers' compensation coverage for an FSET participant who elects to participate in self-initiated workfare, as specified. This bill would require the department to adopt implementing regulations by October 1, 2012.
Who sponsors SB 1322?
SB 1322 is sponsored by Liu.
What is the current status of SB 1322?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1322?
Track SB 1322 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1322

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1322

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →