SB 962 — Prisoners: adjudication of parental rights: participation.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 482, Statutes of 2010.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires notice of, and the opportunity for an incarcerated parent to be physically present in, proceedings terminating his or her parental rights or seeking to adjudicate the child of a prisoner a dependent child of the court. These proceedings may not be adjudicated without the physical presence of the parent unless the court receives a knowing waiver from the parent of his or her right to be physically present at the proceedings, or an affidavit signed by a person in charge of the incarcerating institution that the prisoner does not intend to appear at the proceeding. Existing law provides that, for all other kinds of actions not specified above in which an incarcerated parent's legal rights are adjudicated, the court may order the physical presence of the parent at the proceeding. This bill would provide that an incarcerated parent who has either waived the right to be physically present at the proceeding or who has not been ordered by the court to be present at the proceeding may be given the opportunity, at the discretion of the court, to participate in the proceeding by videoconference or teleconference, if that technology is available, as long as the parent's participation otherwise complies with the law. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to preserve internal job placement opportunities and earned privileges of prisoners, and to prevent the removal of prisoners from court-ordered courses, as a result of participation in child dependency proceedings. This bill would permit the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to accept donated materials and services related to videoconferencing and teleconferencing in order to implement a program, at a prison to be determined by the department, to facilitate the participation of incarcerated parents in dependency court hearings. The bill would specify that the implementation of the program is contingent upon the receipt of sufficient donations of materials and services by the department.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/29/10 - Chaptered Current pdf September 29, 2010
- Enrolled 08/23/10 - Enrolled pdf August 23, 2010
- Amended 08/02/10 - Amended Assembly pdf August 02, 2010
- Amended 06/17/10 - Amended Assembly pdf June 17, 2010
- Amended 04/20/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 20, 2010
- Amended 03/11/10 - Amended Senate pdf March 11, 2010
- Introduced 02/05/10 - Introduced pdf February 05, 2010
- SB962 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 482, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4646.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6178.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
To Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 0. Page 3482.) To Assembly.
-
To Special Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3427.)
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3184.)
-
Set for hearing April 13.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3003.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Set for hearing March 23.
-
To Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 8.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Liu · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Liu
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 84 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 31 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 0% | 0% | 21% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 962 do?
- Existing law requires notice of, and the opportunity for an incarcerated parent to be physically present in, proceedings terminating his or her parental rights or seeking to adjudicate the child of a prisoner a dependent child of the court. These proceedings may not be adjudicated without the physical presence of the parent unless the court receives a knowing waiver from the parent of his or her right to be physically present at the proceedings, or an affidavit signed by a person in charge of the incarcerating institution that the prisoner does not intend to appear at the proceeding. Existing law provides that, for all other kinds of actions not specified above in which an incarcerated parent's legal rights are adjudicated, the court may order the physical presence of the parent at the proceeding. This bill would provide that an incarcerated parent who has either waived the right to be physically present at the proceeding or who has not been ordered by the court to be present at the proceeding may be given the opportunity, at the discretion of the court, to participate in the proceeding by videoconference or teleconference, if that technology is available, as long as the parent's participation otherwise complies with the law. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to preserve internal job placement opportunities and earned privileges of prisoners, and to prevent the removal of prisoners from court-ordered courses, as a result of participation in child dependency proceedings. This bill would permit the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to accept donated materials and services related to videoconferencing and teleconferencing in order to implement a program, at a prison to be determined by the department, to facilitate the participation of incarcerated parents in dependency court hearings. The bill would specify that the implementation of the program is contingent upon the receipt of sufficient donations of materials and services by the department.
- Who sponsors SB 962?
- SB 962 is sponsored by Liu.
- What is the current status of SB 962?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 962?
- Track SB 962 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 962
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 962
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →