California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2270 — Horses: show, competition, and sale events: fees: registration.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 137, Statutes of 2010.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2010. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law regulates horse events, such as shows, competitions, and sales, and the drugging of horses. A violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law provides that in order to provide funds for enforcement of the above-mentioned regulatory provisions, the event manager of every horse event shall charge and collect a fee that the Secretary of Food and Agriculture determines to be necessary to carry out these provisions. Existing law requires the event manager to remit the fee, along with a completed assessment summary, to the Department of Food and Agriculture, as provided. This bill would instead require the submission of the completed assessment report for the registered event to the department. The bill would require the event manager to maintain event records for 2 years and to make the event records available to the department for inspection and photocopying, as provided. By imposing additional requirements on event managers, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. This bill would provide that a show event held over multiple consecutive days, as provided, shall be considered one event for the purpose of the assessment of the fee. Existing law requires every horse event to be registered with the department, unless otherwise prescribed by the secretary by regulation, and provides that an event manager who fails to register an event required to be registered is subject to a civil penalty to be levied by the secretary, as provided. This bill would authorize the secretary to also suspend, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, the event manager from hosting or managing a public horse show or competition for a specified period for each violation. The bill would provide that it is unlawful for a suspended event manager to conduct a public horse show or competition during the period of suspension, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The bill would subject a suspended event manager who hosts or manages a public horse show or competition during the period of suspension to the above-referenced civil penalty for each public horse show or competition held during the period of suspension. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 137, Statutes of 2010.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:15 p.m.

  4. In Assembly. To enrollment.

  5. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 4309.)

  6. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  7. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and to Consent Calendar.

  8. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 15).

  9. Referred to Com. on F. & A.

  10. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  11. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 4820.)

  12. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  13. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 14).

  14. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 24).

  15. Referred to Com. on AGRI.

  16. From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.

  17. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Agriculture · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Agriculture

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 33 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 30006
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 33006
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Florez — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Not Voting
Runner — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Not Voting
Oropeza — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wiggins — Not Voting
Aanestad — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 86 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 81004
Democratic 2001
Republican 3000
Total 86005
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Perez — Yea
Huffman — Not Voting
Norby — Not Voting
Bill — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Not Voting
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Not Voting
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tom — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Feuer — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16002
Democratic 1000
Total 17002
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Conway — Yea
Hall — Yea
Miller — Yea
Norby — Not Voting
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Not Voting
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2270 do?
Existing law regulates horse events, such as shows, competitions, and sales, and the drugging of horses. A violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law provides that in order to provide funds for enforcement of the above-mentioned regulatory provisions, the event manager of every horse event shall charge and collect a fee that the Secretary of Food and Agriculture determines to be necessary to carry out these provisions. Existing law requires the event manager to remit the fee, along with a completed assessment summary, to the Department of Food and Agriculture, as provided. This bill would instead require the submission of the completed assessment report for the registered event to the department. The bill would require the event manager to maintain event records for 2 years and to make the event records available to the department for inspection and photocopying, as provided. By imposing additional requirements on event managers, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. This bill would provide that a show event held over multiple consecutive days, as provided, shall be considered one event for the purpose of the assessment of the fee. Existing law requires every horse event to be registered with the department, unless otherwise prescribed by the secretary by regulation, and provides that an event manager who fails to register an event required to be registered is subject to a civil penalty to be levied by the secretary, as provided. This bill would authorize the secretary to also suspend, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, the event manager from hosting or managing a public horse show or competition for a specified period for each violation. The bill would provide that it is unlawful for a suspended event manager to conduct a public horse show or competition during the period of suspension, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The bill would subject a suspended event manager who hosts or manages a public horse show or competition during the period of suspension to the above-referenced civil penalty for each public horse show or competition held during the period of suspension. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 2270?
AB 2270 is sponsored by Committee on Agriculture.
What is the current status of AB 2270?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2010. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2270?
Track AB 2270 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2270

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2270

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →