Horses: show, competition, and sale events: fees: registration.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2270 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2270.
You're tracking AB 2270
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2270 — Horses: show, competition, and sale events: fees: registration.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 137, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2010. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law regulates horse events, such as shows, competitions, and sales, and the drugging of horses. A violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law provides that in order to provide funds for enforcement of the above-mentioned regulatory provisions, the event manager of every horse event shall charge and collect a fee that the Secretary of Food and Agriculture determines to be necessary to carry out these provisions. Existing law requires the event manager to remit the fee, along with a completed assessment summary, to the Department of Food and Agriculture, as provided. This bill would instead require the submission of the completed assessment report for the registered event to the department. The bill would require the event manager to maintain event records for 2 years and to make the event records available to the department for inspection and photocopying, as provided. By imposing additional requirements on event managers, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. This bill would provide that a show event held over multiple consecutive days, as provided, shall be considered one event for the purpose of the assessment of the fee. Existing law requires every horse event to be registered with the department, unless otherwise prescribed by the secretary by regulation, and provides that an event manager who fails to register an event required to be registered is subject to a civil penalty to be levied by the secretary, as provided. This bill would authorize the secretary to also suspend, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, the event manager from hosting or managing a public horse show or competition for a specified period for each violation. The bill would provide that it is unlawful for a suspended event manager to conduct a public horse show or competition during the period of suspension, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The bill would subject a suspended event manager who hosts or manages a public horse show or competition during the period of suspension to the above-referenced civil penalty for each public horse show or competition held during the period of suspension. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 08/13/10 - Chaptered Current pdf August 13, 2010
- Enrolled 08/04/10 - Enrolled pdf August 04, 2010
- Introduced 02/18/10 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2010
- AB2270 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 137, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:15 p.m.
-
In Assembly. To enrollment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 4309.)
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 15).
-
Referred to Com. on F. & A.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 4820.)
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 14).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 24).
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Agriculture · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Agriculture
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 30 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 81 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 86 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Not Voting |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2270 do?
- Existing law regulates horse events, such as shows, competitions, and sales, and the drugging of horses. A violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law provides that in order to provide funds for enforcement of the above-mentioned regulatory provisions, the event manager of every horse event shall charge and collect a fee that the Secretary of Food and Agriculture determines to be necessary to carry out these provisions. Existing law requires the event manager to remit the fee, along with a completed assessment summary, to the Department of Food and Agriculture, as provided. This bill would instead require the submission of the completed assessment report for the registered event to the department. The bill would require the event manager to maintain event records for 2 years and to make the event records available to the department for inspection and photocopying, as provided. By imposing additional requirements on event managers, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. This bill would provide that a show event held over multiple consecutive days, as provided, shall be considered one event for the purpose of the assessment of the fee. Existing law requires every horse event to be registered with the department, unless otherwise prescribed by the secretary by regulation, and provides that an event manager who fails to register an event required to be registered is subject to a civil penalty to be levied by the secretary, as provided. This bill would authorize the secretary to also suspend, after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, the event manager from hosting or managing a public horse show or competition for a specified period for each violation. The bill would provide that it is unlawful for a suspended event manager to conduct a public horse show or competition during the period of suspension, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The bill would subject a suspended event manager who hosts or manages a public horse show or competition during the period of suspension to the above-referenced civil penalty for each public horse show or competition held during the period of suspension. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2270?
- AB 2270 is sponsored by Committee on Agriculture.
- What is the current status of AB 2270?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2010. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2270?
- Track AB 2270 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2270
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2270
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →