AB 595 — Placement of children: criminal background checks.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 246, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the California Community Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of community care facilities, including foster family homes and foster family agencies, by the State Department of Social Services. Violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. Existing law requires a criminal record check of applicants for a license, special permit, or certificate of approval for a foster family home or certified family home, and other persons, including nonclients who reside in those homes and staff and employees. Existing law requires that an application be denied, unless the Director of Social Services grants an exemption, if it is found that the applicant or any of the other designated persons has been convicted of prescribed crimes. This bill would prohibit the State Department of Social Services or other approving authority from issuing a license or certificate of approval to any foster family home or certified family home applicant who has not obtained both a California and Federal Bureau of Investigation criminal record clearance or an exemption from disqualification, as prescribed. This bill would, to the same extent required for federal funding, effective October 1, 2008, prohibit the director from granting an exemption where a foster care provider applicant or any of the other designated persons have been convicted of certain felonies at any time and other felonies in the previous 5 years. This bill would prohibit exemptions under these circumstances for foster care providers, as specified, in those homes where the individual has been convicted of murder or voluntary manslaughter. (2) Existing law sets forth circumstances under which a minor may be adjudged a dependent child of the juvenile court, and establishes procedures to determine the temporary placement of a dependent child. Existing law requires a county social worker to visit the home of a relative or prospective guardian who is not a licensed or certified foster parent, prior to placing the child in that home, to ascertain the appropriateness of the placement. Existing law also requires the court or county social worker to initiate a state and federal criminal records check through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System as part of their assessment. Existing law provides that these provisions shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2010, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2010, deletes or extends that date. This bill would prohibit placement of the child in the home of a person if the criminal records check indicates the person has been convicted of a crime that the Director of Social Services cannot grant an exemption for with respect to foster family home and certified family home applicants. This bill would also prohibit placement of a child in the home of a person who has been convicted of a crime that the Director of Social Services may grant an exemption for unless a criminal records exemption has been granted by the county, based on substantial and convincing evidence, to support a reasonable belief that the person with the criminal conviction is of such good character as to justify the placement and not present a risk of harm to the child. This bill would repeal the provisions relating to the sunset and repeal of these existing law provisions. To the extent this bill would impose additional duties on county welfare departments, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 08/20/09 - Enrolled pdf August 20, 2009
- Introduced 02/25/09 - Introduced pdf February 25, 2009
- AB595 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 246, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 5 p.m.
-
Returned by the Governor at the request of the Assembly.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.
-
In Assembly. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 1844.)
-
Ordered to Special Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (July 13).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 23).
-
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and PUB. S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1845.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 12).
-
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Adams · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Adams
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 85 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 91 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 595 do?
- (1) Existing law, the California Community Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of community care facilities, including foster family homes and foster family agencies, by the State Department of Social Services. Violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. Existing law requires a criminal record check of applicants for a license, special permit, or certificate of approval for a foster family home or certified family home, and other persons, including nonclients who reside in those homes and staff and employees. Existing law requires that an application be denied, unless the Director of Social Services grants an exemption, if it is found that the applicant or any of the other designated persons has been convicted of prescribed crimes. This bill would prohibit the State Department of Social Services or other approving authority from issuing a license or certificate of approval to any foster family home or certified family home applicant who has not obtained both a California and Federal Bureau of Investigation criminal record clearance or an exemption from disqualification, as prescribed. This bill would, to the same extent required for federal funding, effective October 1, 2008, prohibit the director from granting an exemption where a foster care provider applicant or any of the other designated persons have been convicted of certain felonies at any time and other felonies in the previous 5 years. This bill would prohibit exemptions under these circumstances for foster care providers, as specified, in those homes where the individual has been convicted of murder or voluntary manslaughter. (2) Existing law sets forth circumstances under which a minor may be adjudged a dependent child of the juvenile court, and establishes procedures to determine the temporary placement of a dependent child. Existing law requires a county social worker to visit the home of a relative or prospective guardian who is not a licensed or certified foster parent, prior to placing the child in that home, to ascertain the appropriateness of the placement. Existing law also requires the court or county social worker to initiate a state and federal criminal records check through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System as part of their assessment. Existing law provides that these provisions shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2010, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2010, deletes or extends that date. This bill would prohibit placement of the child in the home of a person if the criminal records check indicates the person has been convicted of a crime that the Director of Social Services cannot grant an exemption for with respect to foster family home and certified family home applicants. This bill would also prohibit placement of a child in the home of a person who has been convicted of a crime that the Director of Social Services may grant an exemption for unless a criminal records exemption has been granted by the county, based on substantial and convincing evidence, to support a reasonable belief that the person with the criminal conviction is of such good character as to justify the placement and not present a risk of harm to the child. This bill would repeal the provisions relating to the sunset and repeal of these existing law provisions. To the extent this bill would impose additional duties on county welfare departments, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 595?
- AB 595 is sponsored by Adams.
- What is the current status of AB 595?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 595?
- Track AB 595 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 595
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 595
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →