California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 595 — Placement of children: criminal background checks.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 246, Statutes of 2009.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the California Community Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of community care facilities, including foster family homes and foster family agencies, by the State Department of Social Services. Violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. Existing law requires a criminal record check of applicants for a license, special permit, or certificate of approval for a foster family home or certified family home, and other persons, including nonclients who reside in those homes and staff and employees. Existing law requires that an application be denied, unless the Director of Social Services grants an exemption, if it is found that the applicant or any of the other designated persons has been convicted of prescribed crimes. This bill would prohibit the State Department of Social Services or other approving authority from issuing a license or certificate of approval to any foster family home or certified family home applicant who has not obtained both a California and Federal Bureau of Investigation criminal record clearance or an exemption from disqualification, as prescribed. This bill would, to the same extent required for federal funding, effective October 1, 2008, prohibit the director from granting an exemption where a foster care provider applicant or any of the other designated persons have been convicted of certain felonies at any time and other felonies in the previous 5 years. This bill would prohibit exemptions under these circumstances for foster care providers, as specified, in those homes where the individual has been convicted of murder or voluntary manslaughter. (2) Existing law sets forth circumstances under which a minor may be adjudged a dependent child of the juvenile court, and establishes procedures to determine the temporary placement of a dependent child. Existing law requires a county social worker to visit the home of a relative or prospective guardian who is not a licensed or certified foster parent, prior to placing the child in that home, to ascertain the appropriateness of the placement. Existing law also requires the court or county social worker to initiate a state and federal criminal records check through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System as part of their assessment. Existing law provides that these provisions shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2010, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2010, deletes or extends that date. This bill would prohibit placement of the child in the home of a person if the criminal records check indicates the person has been convicted of a crime that the Director of Social Services cannot grant an exemption for with respect to foster family home and certified family home applicants. This bill would also prohibit placement of a child in the home of a person who has been convicted of a crime that the Director of Social Services may grant an exemption for unless a criminal records exemption has been granted by the county, based on substantial and convincing evidence, to support a reasonable belief that the person with the criminal conviction is of such good character as to justify the placement and not present a risk of harm to the child. This bill would repeal the provisions relating to the sunset and repeal of these existing law provisions. To the extent this bill would impose additional duties on county welfare departments, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 246, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 5 p.m.

  4. Returned by the Governor at the request of the Assembly.

  5. Enrolled and to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.

  6. In Assembly. To enrollment.

  7. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 1844.)

  8. Ordered to Special Consent Calendar.

  9. Read second time. To third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (July 13).

  11. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  12. Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 23).

  14. Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and PUB. S.

  15. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  16. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1845.)

  17. Read second time. To third reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).

  19. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  20. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 12).

  21. Referred to Com. on HUM. S.

  22. From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.

  23. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Adams · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Adams

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33005
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 36005
% of votes cast 88%0%0%12%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Leno — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Romero — Not Voting
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Harman — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Oropeza — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12001
Total 12001
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Leno — Yea
Runner — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cox — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 91 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 85001
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 91001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Bass — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Price — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 22 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20000
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 22000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Duvall — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Miller — Yea
Price — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 595 do?
(1) Existing law, the California Community Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of community care facilities, including foster family homes and foster family agencies, by the State Department of Social Services. Violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. Existing law requires a criminal record check of applicants for a license, special permit, or certificate of approval for a foster family home or certified family home, and other persons, including nonclients who reside in those homes and staff and employees. Existing law requires that an application be denied, unless the Director of Social Services grants an exemption, if it is found that the applicant or any of the other designated persons has been convicted of prescribed crimes. This bill would prohibit the State Department of Social Services or other approving authority from issuing a license or certificate of approval to any foster family home or certified family home applicant who has not obtained both a California and Federal Bureau of Investigation criminal record clearance or an exemption from disqualification, as prescribed. This bill would, to the same extent required for federal funding, effective October 1, 2008, prohibit the director from granting an exemption where a foster care provider applicant or any of the other designated persons have been convicted of certain felonies at any time and other felonies in the previous 5 years. This bill would prohibit exemptions under these circumstances for foster care providers, as specified, in those homes where the individual has been convicted of murder or voluntary manslaughter. (2) Existing law sets forth circumstances under which a minor may be adjudged a dependent child of the juvenile court, and establishes procedures to determine the temporary placement of a dependent child. Existing law requires a county social worker to visit the home of a relative or prospective guardian who is not a licensed or certified foster parent, prior to placing the child in that home, to ascertain the appropriateness of the placement. Existing law also requires the court or county social worker to initiate a state and federal criminal records check through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System as part of their assessment. Existing law provides that these provisions shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2010, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2010, deletes or extends that date. This bill would prohibit placement of the child in the home of a person if the criminal records check indicates the person has been convicted of a crime that the Director of Social Services cannot grant an exemption for with respect to foster family home and certified family home applicants. This bill would also prohibit placement of a child in the home of a person who has been convicted of a crime that the Director of Social Services may grant an exemption for unless a criminal records exemption has been granted by the county, based on substantial and convincing evidence, to support a reasonable belief that the person with the criminal conviction is of such good character as to justify the placement and not present a risk of harm to the child. This bill would repeal the provisions relating to the sunset and repeal of these existing law provisions. To the extent this bill would impose additional duties on county welfare departments, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 595?
AB 595 is sponsored by Adams.
What is the current status of AB 595?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 595?
Track AB 595 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 595

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 595

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →