California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 505 — Local planning: fire hazard impacts.

Last action — Stricken from Senate file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law authorizes the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to furnish information and technical and professional advice on the preparation, adoption, amendment, and implementation of specified plans, including general plans, when requested by a local or regional agency. This bill would require OPR, on or before January 1, 2011, to update its "Fire Hazard Planning" document prepared as part of the General Plan Technical Advice Series and issued in November of 2003. (2) The Planning and Zoning Law requires that a city or county general plan consist of various elements, including, among other things, land use, circulation, housing, open space, conservation, and safety elements, which are required to meet specified requirements. The safety element is for the protection of the community from unreasonable risks associated with, among other things, the effects of seismically induced surface rupture, ground shaking, ground failure, tsunami, seiche, dam failure, and wild land and urban fires. The safety element includes requirements for state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones. This bill would revise the safety element requirements for state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones, as specified, and require the safety element, prior to January 1, 2015, and thereafter upon each revision of the housing element, to be reviewed and updated as necessary to address the risk of fire for land classified as state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones. The bill would require the review to include consideration of the advice contained within the most recent publication of the OPR's "Fire Hazard Planning" document and other specified information. The bill would also require the city or county to establish a set of goals, policies, and objectives based upon specified information regarding fire hazards, and to establish a set of feasible implementation measures designed to carry out those goals, policies, and objectives. By imposing new duties on local officials for the adoption of a general plan, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (3) The Planning and Zoning Law requires the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection and the local agency to review the draft or existing safety element and to report its written recommendations to the planning agency within 60 days of its receipt of the draft or existing safety element. The State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection and the local agency are authorized to offer written recommendations for changes to the draft or existing safety element regarding uses of land, policies, and methods for wildland fire risk reduction and prevention in state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones. This bill would instead require the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and authorize the local agency, to review the draft or existing safety element and recommend changes to the planning agency regarding uses of land, policies, and methods for wildland fire risk reduction and prevention in state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones within 60 days of the receipt of the draft or existing safety element. (4) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA requires OPR to prepare and develop proposed guidelines for the implementation of CEQA by public agencies. This bill would require OPR, on or after January 1, 2010, at the time of the next update of guidelines implementing CEQA, in cooperation with the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, to prepare, develop, and transmit to the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency recommended proposed changes or amendments to the initial study for the inclusion of questions related to fire hazard impacts for projects located on lands in state responsibility areas, as defined, and on lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, as defined. The Natural Resources Agency would be required to certify and adopt the recommended proposed changes or amendments prepared and developed by the OPR in accordance with these provisions. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Stricken from Senate file.

  2. In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)

  3. Vetoed by Governor.

  4. Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.

  5. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 25. Noes 14. Page 2281.) To enrollment.

  6. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 55. Noes 18. Page 2862.) To Senate.

  8. Read second time. To third reading.

  9. (Received by Desk on August 28 pursuant to Joint Rule 61(a)(11).)

  10. (Heard in committee on August 27.)

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)

  12. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  13. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. (Heard in committee on July 6.)

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.)

  16. (Heard in committee on July 1.)

  17. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.

  18. To Coms. on L. GOV. and NAT. RES.

  19. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  20. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 15. Page 1191.) To Assembly.

  21. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  22. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 5. Page 1072.)

  23. (Suspense - for vote only.)

  24. Set for hearing May 28.

  25. Placed on APPR suspense file.

  26. Set for hearing May 11.

  27. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  28. Set for hearing May 4.

  29. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 679.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  30. Set for hearing April 27.

  31. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on EQ.

  32. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on EQ. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 498.)

  33. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  34. Set for hearing April 15.

  35. To Coms. on L. GOV. and EQ.

  36. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 28.

  37. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Davis · Cosponsor
  • De La Torre · Cosponsor
  • Kehoe · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Kehoe

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Davis
  • De La Torre

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB505 Kehoe

Passed 26 Yea · 14 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 241301
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 261401
% of votes cast 63%34%0%2%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Cogdill — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Nay
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Nay
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Hollingsworth — Nay
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Price — Not Voting
Steinberg — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 63 Yea · 20 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 601807
Democratic 2001
Republican 1200
Total 632008
% of votes cast 69%22%0%9%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Cook — Yea
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Yea
Audra — Nay
Tom — Not Voting
Charles — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Not Voting
Hagman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Chesbro — Not Voting
Conway — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Silva — Nay
Tran — Nay
Bill — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Not Voting
Huber — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Feuer — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 16 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15500
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 16600
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Conway — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 25 Yea · 15 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231400
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 251500
% of votes cast 63%38%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Florez — Yea
Runner — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Hollingsworth — Nay
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Nay
Maldonado — Nay
Oropeza — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 7 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7501
Total 7501
% of votes cast 54%38%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Runner — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Runner — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Leno — Yea
Walters — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 505 do?
(1) Existing law authorizes the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to furnish information and technical and professional advice on the preparation, adoption, amendment, and implementation of specified plans, including general plans, when requested by a local or regional agency. This bill would require OPR, on or before January 1, 2011, to update its "Fire Hazard Planning" document prepared as part of the General Plan Technical Advice Series and issued in November of 2003. (2) The Planning and Zoning Law requires that a city or county general plan consist of various elements, including, among other things, land use, circulation, housing, open space, conservation, and safety elements, which are required to meet specified requirements. The safety element is for the protection of the community from unreasonable risks associated with, among other things, the effects of seismically induced surface rupture, ground shaking, ground failure, tsunami, seiche, dam failure, and wild land and urban fires. The safety element includes requirements for state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones. This bill would revise the safety element requirements for state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones, as specified, and require the safety element, prior to January 1, 2015, and thereafter upon each revision of the housing element, to be reviewed and updated as necessary to address the risk of fire for land classified as state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones. The bill would require the review to include consideration of the advice contained within the most recent publication of the OPR's "Fire Hazard Planning" document and other specified information. The bill would also require the city or county to establish a set of goals, policies, and objectives based upon specified information regarding fire hazards, and to establish a set of feasible implementation measures designed to carry out those goals, policies, and objectives. By imposing new duties on local officials for the adoption of a general plan, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (3) The Planning and Zoning Law requires the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection and the local agency to review the draft or existing safety element and to report its written recommendations to the planning agency within 60 days of its receipt of the draft or existing safety element. The State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection and the local agency are authorized to offer written recommendations for changes to the draft or existing safety element regarding uses of land, policies, and methods for wildland fire risk reduction and prevention in state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones. This bill would instead require the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, and authorize the local agency, to review the draft or existing safety element and recommend changes to the planning agency regarding uses of land, policies, and methods for wildland fire risk reduction and prevention in state responsibility areas and very high fire hazard severity zones within 60 days of the receipt of the draft or existing safety element. (4) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA requires OPR to prepare and develop proposed guidelines for the implementation of CEQA by public agencies. This bill would require OPR, on or after January 1, 2010, at the time of the next update of guidelines implementing CEQA, in cooperation with the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, to prepare, develop, and transmit to the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency recommended proposed changes or amendments to the initial study for the inclusion of questions related to fire hazard impacts for projects located on lands in state responsibility areas, as defined, and on lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, as defined. The Natural Resources Agency would be required to certify and adopt the recommended proposed changes or amendments prepared and developed by the OPR in accordance with these provisions. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 505?
SB 505 is sponsored by Davis, De La Torre, and Kehoe.
What is the current status of SB 505?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 505?
Track SB 505 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 505

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 505

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →