Hazardous substances: underground storage tanks.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2224 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2224.
You're tracking AB 2224
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2224 — Hazardous substances: underground storage tanks.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law generally requires a local agency, as defined, to inspect every underground tank system, as defined, that is used for the storage of hazardous substances, at least once every year. After conducting the inspection, the local agency is required to prepare a compliance report detailing the inspection and to send a copy of the report to the permitholder and the owner or operator. Existing law authorizes the local agency, instead of performing the inspection itself, to require the permitholder to employ a special inspector to conduct the annual inspection. Within 60 days of receiving a compliance report or special inspection report, the permitholder is required to file with the local agency a plan to implement all recommendations contained in the compliance report or to demonstrate why those recommendations should not be implemented. This bill would require the California Environmental Protection Agency, by June 30, 2011, and in consultation with specified entities, to implement a process by which the local agency may verify annually the accuracy of the tank number issued by the State Board of Equalization, to determine that the tank number is the correct and accurate number for the permitted tank. The bill would require the local agency, pursuant to that process, to verify annually that the tank number issued by the State Board of Equalization for the permitted tank is correct and accurate, thereby implementing a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/25/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 25, 2010
- Introduced 02/18/10 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2010
- AB2224 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on EQ.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 5051.)
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 28).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 13).
-
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Ruskin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Ruskin
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 78 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 84 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| La | — | Not Voting |
| Torre | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Bass | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 84% | 0% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2224 do?
- (1) Existing law generally requires a local agency, as defined, to inspect every underground tank system, as defined, that is used for the storage of hazardous substances, at least once every year. After conducting the inspection, the local agency is required to prepare a compliance report detailing the inspection and to send a copy of the report to the permitholder and the owner or operator. Existing law authorizes the local agency, instead of performing the inspection itself, to require the permitholder to employ a special inspector to conduct the annual inspection. Within 60 days of receiving a compliance report or special inspection report, the permitholder is required to file with the local agency a plan to implement all recommendations contained in the compliance report or to demonstrate why those recommendations should not be implemented. This bill would require the California Environmental Protection Agency, by June 30, 2011, and in consultation with specified entities, to implement a process by which the local agency may verify annually the accuracy of the tank number issued by the State Board of Equalization, to determine that the tank number is the correct and accurate number for the permitted tank. The bill would require the local agency, pursuant to that process, to verify annually that the tank number issued by the State Board of Equalization for the permitted tank is correct and accurate, thereby implementing a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2224?
- AB 2224 is sponsored by Ruskin.
- What is the current status of AB 2224?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2224?
- Track AB 2224 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2224
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2224
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →