Irrigated agriculture: pesticide use: operator identification number: water quality: waste discharge requir...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2595 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2595.
You're tracking AB 2595
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2595 — Irrigated agriculture: pesticide use: operator identification number: water quality: waste discharge requirements.
Last action — Died on Senate inactive file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law regulates pesticide use and requires a pesticide use report to be submitted to the county agricultural commissioner or the Director of Pesticide Regulation, as specified, for use in the setting of priorities for, among other things, pesticide use enforcement and pest control research, environmental monitoring, and public health monitoring and research. Existing regulations provide that prior to the purchase or use of pesticides for the production of an agricultural commodity, the operator of the property, as defined, or the operator's authorized representative, shall obtain an operator identification number for pesticide use from the county agricultural commissioner of each county where pest control work will be performed. This bill would codify that requirement relating to the operator identification number and, on and after January 1, 2012, would require the county agricultural commissioner to withhold the issuance of an operator identification number for pesticide use if, pursuant to a notice transmitted by the State Water Resources Control Board or a California regional water quality control board, an operator of the property is found to be in violation of specified water quality requirements after the exhaustion of all administrative proceedings and appeals. The bill would authorize a county agricultural commissioner to levy a specified civil penalty on an operator who obtains an operator identification number by means of fraud. By imposing new requirements on county agricultural commissioners, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, requires the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) and a California regional water quality control board (regional board) to prescribe waste discharge requirements, as specified. The act authorizes the state board and a regional board to waive certain waste discharge requirements as to a specific discharge or type of discharge if the state board or the regional board makes a specified determination. For purposes of implementing the provisions relating to the issuance of an operator identification number for pesticide use, this bill would require the state board or a regional board to provide notice to the Department of Pesticide Regulation and the appropriate county agricultural commissioners if, pursuant to an administrative order, the state board or the regional board finds that an operator of the property, as defined, is in violation of any specified water quality requirements. The bill would prohibit the state board or the regional board from transmitting the notice unless 30 days have elapsed after the date on which specified administrative or judicial appeals and proceedings are exhausted. The bill would require the state board or the regional board to issue a written certification of compliance to an operator of the property upon remedying the violation, and payment of administrative civil liability imposed, for the water quality violations. The bill would require the county agricultural commissioner, upon receipt of a certificate of compliance, to immediately issue the withheld operator identification number to an operator who has remedied the subject violation or violations. The bill would also make a technical, nonsubstantive change to the provisions. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/17/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 17, 2010
- Amended 08/02/10 - Amended Senate pdf August 02, 2010
- Amended 04/22/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 22, 2010
- Amended 04/20/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 20, 2010
- Amended 04/08/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 08, 2010
- Introduced 02/19/10 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2010
- AB2595 View text html
Action History
-
Died on Senate inactive file.
-
To inactive file on motion of Senator Kehoe.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 5.) (August 12).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 28).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on EQ. Re-referred. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (June 15).
-
Referred to Coms. on F. & A. and EQ.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 66. Noes 1. Page 5289.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 19).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 21).
-
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 13).
-
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on E.S. & T.M. and AGRI.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Huffman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Huffman
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 45% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 73 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 78 | 1 | 0 | 12 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 1% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Saldana | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Not Voting |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| Leon | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2595 do?
- Existing law regulates pesticide use and requires a pesticide use report to be submitted to the county agricultural commissioner or the Director of Pesticide Regulation, as specified, for use in the setting of priorities for, among other things, pesticide use enforcement and pest control research, environmental monitoring, and public health monitoring and research. Existing regulations provide that prior to the purchase or use of pesticides for the production of an agricultural commodity, the operator of the property, as defined, or the operator's authorized representative, shall obtain an operator identification number for pesticide use from the county agricultural commissioner of each county where pest control work will be performed. This bill would codify that requirement relating to the operator identification number and, on and after January 1, 2012, would require the county agricultural commissioner to withhold the issuance of an operator identification number for pesticide use if, pursuant to a notice transmitted by the State Water Resources Control Board or a California regional water quality control board, an operator of the property is found to be in violation of specified water quality requirements after the exhaustion of all administrative proceedings and appeals. The bill would authorize a county agricultural commissioner to levy a specified civil penalty on an operator who obtains an operator identification number by means of fraud. By imposing new requirements on county agricultural commissioners, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, requires the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) and a California regional water quality control board (regional board) to prescribe waste discharge requirements, as specified. The act authorizes the state board and a regional board to waive certain waste discharge requirements as to a specific discharge or type of discharge if the state board or the regional board makes a specified determination. For purposes of implementing the provisions relating to the issuance of an operator identification number for pesticide use, this bill would require the state board or a regional board to provide notice to the Department of Pesticide Regulation and the appropriate county agricultural commissioners if, pursuant to an administrative order, the state board or the regional board finds that an operator of the property, as defined, is in violation of any specified water quality requirements. The bill would prohibit the state board or the regional board from transmitting the notice unless 30 days have elapsed after the date on which specified administrative or judicial appeals and proceedings are exhausted. The bill would require the state board or the regional board to issue a written certification of compliance to an operator of the property upon remedying the violation, and payment of administrative civil liability imposed, for the water quality violations. The bill would require the county agricultural commissioner, upon receipt of a certificate of compliance, to immediately issue the withheld operator identification number to an operator who has remedied the subject violation or violations. The bill would also make a technical, nonsubstantive change to the provisions. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 2595?
- AB 2595 is sponsored by Huffman.
- What is the current status of AB 2595?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2595?
- Track AB 2595 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2595
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2595
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →