California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 296 — Supplemental educational services.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing federal law defines "supplemental educational services" as tutoring and other supplemental academic enrichment services that are provided in addition to instruction provided during the schoolday and are high quality, research-based, and specifically designed to increase academic achievement, as specified. Under federal law, local educational agencies, state educational agencies, and providers of supplemental educational services are required to comply with certain requirements relating to the administration of these supplemental educational services. This bill would require local educational agencies and supplemental educational service providers to comply with specified requirements relating to these supplemental educational services, including requirements relating to providing information to parents and guardians and enrollment of pupils in supplemental educational services. The bill would require local educational agencies to permit supplemental educational service providers access to school facilities if the local educational agency provides access to outside entities, except as specified. Because the bill would require local educational agencies to provide a higher level of service, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. In committee: Held under submission.

  3. In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.

  4. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 15).

  5. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  6. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  7. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  8. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  9. Referred to Com. on ED.

  10. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  11. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 31. Page 1756.)

  12. Read second time. To third reading.

  13. (Corrected May 27.)

  14. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  15. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 20).

  16. (Corrected May 26.)

  17. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  18. Read second time and amended.

  19. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 29).

  20. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  21. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  22. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  23. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  24. Referred to Com. on ED.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.

  26. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Solorio · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Solorio

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Cox — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

AB 296 SOLORIO Assembly Third Reading

Passed 56 Yea · 34 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 503202
Democratic 5000
Republican 1200
Total 563402
% of votes cast 61%37%0%2%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Carter — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Beall — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Bill — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Fuentes — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Gaines — Nay
Audra — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
DeVore — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Nay
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Silva — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Nay
Villines — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Coto — Yea
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 15 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 14401
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 15501
% of votes cast 71%24%0%5%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Duvall — Nay
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Price — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 296 do?
(1) Existing federal law defines "supplemental educational services" as tutoring and other supplemental academic enrichment services that are provided in addition to instruction provided during the schoolday and are high quality, research-based, and specifically designed to increase academic achievement, as specified. Under federal law, local educational agencies, state educational agencies, and providers of supplemental educational services are required to comply with certain requirements relating to the administration of these supplemental educational services. This bill would require local educational agencies and supplemental educational service providers to comply with specified requirements relating to these supplemental educational services, including requirements relating to providing information to parents and guardians and enrollment of pupils in supplemental educational services. The bill would require local educational agencies to permit supplemental educational service providers access to school facilities if the local educational agency provides access to outside entities, except as specified. Because the bill would require local educational agencies to provide a higher level of service, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 296?
AB 296 is sponsored by Solorio.
What is the current status of AB 296?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 296?
Track AB 296 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 296

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 296

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →