Bingo: remote caller bingo.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 126 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 126.
You're tracking SB 126
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 126 — Bingo: remote caller bingo.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 562, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The California Constitution allows the Legislature, by statute, to authorize cities and counties to provide for bingo games for charitable purposes. The California Remote Caller Bingo Act permits cities and counties to allow bingo games and remote caller bingo games, as defined, to be conducted by specified organizations for charitable purposes pursuant to an ordinance that allows those games to be conducted only in accordance with specified requirements. Existing law includes school districts among the organizations authorized to conduct bingo games, and includes charitable organizations affiliated with a school district among the organizations authorized to conduct remote caller bingo games. This bill would delete the reference to school districts in the provisions specifying the organizations that may conduct bingo games and would instead authorize charitable organizations affiliated with a school district to conduct bingo games. The bill would set forth a model ordinance to authorize remote caller bingo. The bill would make other conforming changes. (2) The act requires the California Gambling Control Commission, by May 1, 2009, to adopt emergency regulations concerning remote caller bingo and card-minding devices, effective for an initial period of 180 days, and permits one readoption of those emergency regulations for an additional period of 180 days. The commission is directed to complete the normal public notice and comment process, giving careful consideration to the comments of all interested parties. This bill, instead, would provide that all emergency regulations adopted by the commission pursuant to these provisions before July 1, 2009, shall remain in effect until December 31, 2011, except to the extent that the commission exercises its power to adopt, amend, or repeal those regulations in whole or in part. The bill would delete the requirement that the commission complete the normal public notice and comment process. (3) The act provides that an organization authorized to conduct a remote caller bingo game shall not have overhead costs, as defined, exceeding 20% of gross sales. This bill would provide that fees paid to financial institutions for the use and processing of credit card sales may be deducted from the amount of gross revenues awarded for prizes and not included in overhead costs, as provided. (4) The act requires an organization that conducts a remote caller bingo game to have the records pertaining to those games audited at least annually by an independent California certified public accountant and for copies of the audit report to be provided to the California Gambling Control Commission. This bill would provide that the audit report shall account for the annual amount of fees paid to financial institutions for the use and processing of credit card sales and the amount redirected from overhead costs, as provided. (5) The act requires the California Gambling Control Commission to establish reasonable criteria regulating, and to require the licensure and registration of, specified persons, including any person who provides services or equipment designed for use in the playing of remote caller bingo games by any nonprofit organization registered to conduct those bingo games. This bill would delete the requirement that the commission establish criteria for the registration of the persons described above. (6) The act requires the commission to establish reasonable criteria for, and to require the licensure and registration of, any person who provides card-minding devices or other equipment or services designed for use in the playing of bingo games by any nonprofit organization registered to conduct bingo games. This bill would delete the requirement that the commission establish criteria for the registration of the persons described above. (7) This bill would make various technical, nonsubstantive changes to the provisions governing remote caller bingo games. (8) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/10/09 - Enrolled pdf September 10, 2009
- Amended 08/31/09 - Amended Assembly pdf August 31, 2009
- Amended 08/24/09 - Amended Assembly pdf August 24, 2009
- Amended 07/01/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 01, 2009
- Amended 06/18/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 18, 2009
- Amended 04/16/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 16, 2009
- Amended 03/25/09 - Amended Senate pdf March 25, 2009
- Introduced 02/05/09 - Introduced pdf February 05, 2009
- SB126 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 562, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 10:30 a.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 38. Noes 1. Page 2295.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 1. Page 2920.) To Senate.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 2825.) To third reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
-
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
-
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
To Com. on G.O.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 1. Page 1003.) To Assembly.
-
Placed on third reading.
-
From Special Consent Calendar.
-
To Special Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 477.)
-
Set for hearing April 14.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
To Com. on G.O.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 8.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Cedillo · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Cedillo
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 2% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 82 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 87 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 1% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 126 do?
- (1) The California Constitution allows the Legislature, by statute, to authorize cities and counties to provide for bingo games for charitable purposes. The California Remote Caller Bingo Act permits cities and counties to allow bingo games and remote caller bingo games, as defined, to be conducted by specified organizations for charitable purposes pursuant to an ordinance that allows those games to be conducted only in accordance with specified requirements. Existing law includes school districts among the organizations authorized to conduct bingo games, and includes charitable organizations affiliated with a school district among the organizations authorized to conduct remote caller bingo games. This bill would delete the reference to school districts in the provisions specifying the organizations that may conduct bingo games and would instead authorize charitable organizations affiliated with a school district to conduct bingo games. The bill would set forth a model ordinance to authorize remote caller bingo. The bill would make other conforming changes. (2) The act requires the California Gambling Control Commission, by May 1, 2009, to adopt emergency regulations concerning remote caller bingo and card-minding devices, effective for an initial period of 180 days, and permits one readoption of those emergency regulations for an additional period of 180 days. The commission is directed to complete the normal public notice and comment process, giving careful consideration to the comments of all interested parties. This bill, instead, would provide that all emergency regulations adopted by the commission pursuant to these provisions before July 1, 2009, shall remain in effect until December 31, 2011, except to the extent that the commission exercises its power to adopt, amend, or repeal those regulations in whole or in part. The bill would delete the requirement that the commission complete the normal public notice and comment process. (3) The act provides that an organization authorized to conduct a remote caller bingo game shall not have overhead costs, as defined, exceeding 20% of gross sales. This bill would provide that fees paid to financial institutions for the use and processing of credit card sales may be deducted from the amount of gross revenues awarded for prizes and not included in overhead costs, as provided. (4) The act requires an organization that conducts a remote caller bingo game to have the records pertaining to those games audited at least annually by an independent California certified public accountant and for copies of the audit report to be provided to the California Gambling Control Commission. This bill would provide that the audit report shall account for the annual amount of fees paid to financial institutions for the use and processing of credit card sales and the amount redirected from overhead costs, as provided. (5) The act requires the California Gambling Control Commission to establish reasonable criteria regulating, and to require the licensure and registration of, specified persons, including any person who provides services or equipment designed for use in the playing of remote caller bingo games by any nonprofit organization registered to conduct those bingo games. This bill would delete the requirement that the commission establish criteria for the registration of the persons described above. (6) The act requires the commission to establish reasonable criteria for, and to require the licensure and registration of, any person who provides card-minding devices or other equipment or services designed for use in the playing of bingo games by any nonprofit organization registered to conduct bingo games. This bill would delete the requirement that the commission establish criteria for the registration of the persons described above. (7) This bill would make various technical, nonsubstantive changes to the provisions governing remote caller bingo games. (8) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 126?
- SB 126 is sponsored by Cedillo.
- What is the current status of SB 126?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 126?
- Track SB 126 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 126
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 126
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →