AB 1350 — Energy: regional mitigation.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. Except as provided, CEQA requires the lead agency to mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment of a project it carries out or approves whenever feasible to do so. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. The California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program requires a retail seller of electricity, including electrical corporations, community choice aggregators, and electric service providers, to purchase a specified minimum percentage of electricity generated by eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, in any given year as a specified percentage of total kilowatthours sold to retail end-use customers each calendar year. This bill would authorize the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to communicate, coordinate, and work with specified entities to consider and implement mitigation requirements on a regional basis for projects proposing to develop eligible renewable energy resources for the purposes of the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. The bill would authorize the commission to execute an agreement, memorandum of its understanding, or other similar instrument memorializing it understanding of any communication, coordination, or implementation activities with other state agencies for the purposes of meeting mitigation requirements on a regional basis.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/02/09 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 02, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- AB1350 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Coms. on E., U., & C. and EQ.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 1470.)
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 6).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 27).
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Blakeslee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Blakeslee
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 77 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 85 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Saldana | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Bass | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Not Voting |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1350 do?
- The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. Except as provided, CEQA requires the lead agency to mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment of a project it carries out or approves whenever feasible to do so. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. The California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program requires a retail seller of electricity, including electrical corporations, community choice aggregators, and electric service providers, to purchase a specified minimum percentage of electricity generated by eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, in any given year as a specified percentage of total kilowatthours sold to retail end-use customers each calendar year. This bill would authorize the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to communicate, coordinate, and work with specified entities to consider and implement mitigation requirements on a regional basis for projects proposing to develop eligible renewable energy resources for the purposes of the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. The bill would authorize the commission to execute an agreement, memorandum of its understanding, or other similar instrument memorializing it understanding of any communication, coordination, or implementation activities with other state agencies for the purposes of meeting mitigation requirements on a regional basis.
- Who sponsors AB 1350?
- AB 1350 is sponsored by Blakeslee.
- What is the current status of AB 1350?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1350?
- Track AB 1350 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1350
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1350
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →