California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 406 — Land use: environmental quality.

Last action — Stricken from Senate file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The Planning and Zoning Law establishes the Planning Advisory and Assistance Council in the Office of Planning and Research, and prescribes the membership and duties of the council. This bill would change the designated membership, as specified, of the Planning Advisory and Assistance Council and would require that the council work with the Strategic Growth Council, regional agencies, and cities and counties to facilitate the implementation of regional blueprint plans. The bill would also require the council to develop and propose recommendations to specified state agencies to facilitate coordination between regional blueprint plans, state growth and infrastructure funding plans, and programs that facilitate the implementation of regional blueprint plans. The bill would further require the council to report to the Legislature on regional performance measures, as specified, and on the manner in which state agencies are implementing the 5-year infrastructure plan. The bill would require the council to begin to perform the above functions and duties when sufficient funding, as determined by the council, exists from the revenue transmitted to it by metropolitan planning organizations, councils of governments, or county transportation commissions and subregional councils of governments jointly preparing subregional sustainable communities strategies. Existing law authorizes a local air quality management district, except the Sacramento district, that has been designated by the State Air Resources Board as a state nonattainment area for any pollutant emitted by motor vehicles to levy a fee of up to $6 on motor vehicles registered within the district, subject to specified conditions. Existing law also authorizes the board of the Sacramento district, subject to specified provisions of law or with the approval of the board of supervisors of each county included, in whole or in part, within the district, to adopt a surcharge, not to exceed $6, on the motor vehicle registration fees applicable to all motor vehicles registered in those counties within the Sacramento district whose boards of supervisors have adopted a resolution approving the surcharge, subject to additional specified conditions. The bill would require, upon the request of a municipal planning organization, as defined, a council of governments, as defined, or a county transportation commission and a subregional council of governments jointly preparing a subregional sustainable communities strategy, the Department of Motor Vehicles to increase the fee on motor vehicles within the district, or the surcharge on motor vehicles registered in those counties within the Sacramento district, as the case may be, by $1 or $2. The bill would require the department to transmit the additional fee revenue to the respective entity requesting the increase. The bill would authorize the additional fee amount to be authorized only if the metropolitan planning organization, the council of governments, or the county transportation commission and the subregional council of governments jointly preparing a subregional sustainable communities strategy adopts a resolution, as specified, authorizing the additional fee. The additional fee would be required to apply to an original vehicle registration occurring on or after 6 months following the adoption of the resolution, as specified, and to a renewal of registration with an expiration date on or after that 6-month period. The bill would require that all revenue received by the metropolitan planning organization, the council of governments, or a county transportation commission and a subregional council of governments jointly preparing a subregional sustainable communities strategy pursuant to the above provisions be used solely to develop a sustainable communities strategy or a regional blueprint plan to identify land use strategies to reduce the use of motor vehicles in its jurisdiction and to carry out applicable transportation-related activities necessary to implement the plan, in order to achieve a specified greenhouse gas emission reduction target. The bill would also require that the additional fee revenue that exceeds $1 in specified jurisdictions be used to provide grants to cities, counties, cities and counties, and congestion management agencies for planning and projects related to the implementation of a regional blueprint plan, and 5% of all the revenue it receives from the first $1 of the additional fee to be transmitted to the council for performance of specified functions. The bill would make conforming changes to existing law. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature to update the duties and composition of the Planning Advisory and Assistance Council to assist in the state's land use planning processes by providing funding to support the development and implementation for regional blueprints and related planning and to work with state agencies providing funding for resource protection and local infrastructure to facilitate coordination between state planning and funding decisions and regional blueprints.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Stricken from Senate file.

  2. In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)

  3. Vetoed by Governor.

  4. Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.

  5. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 21. Noes 17. Page 2432.) To enrollment.

  6. In Senate.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 47. Noes 31. Page 3341.) To Senate.

  8. (Corrected September 11.)

  9. Read third time. Amended. (Ayes 43. Noes 28. Page 3042.) To third reading.

  10. Read second time. To third reading.

  11. Read second time. Amended. To second reading.

  12. (Heard in committee on August 27.)

  13. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)

  14. Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  15. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. (Heard in committee on July 6.)

  17. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 6.)

  18. (Heard in committee on July 1.)

  19. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on TRANS. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

  20. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  21. To Coms. on L. GOV. and TRANS.

  22. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  23. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 16. Page 1144.) To Assembly.

  24. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  25. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 5. Page 1071.)

  26. (Suspense - for vote only.)

  27. Set for hearing May 28.

  28. Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 1036.)

  29. Placed on APPR suspense file.

  30. Set for hearing May 26.

  31. Hearing postponed by committee.

  32. Set for hearing May 18.

  33. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  34. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 4. Page 707.)

  35. Set for hearing April 28.

  36. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.

  37. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 498.) Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  38. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  39. Set for hearing April 15.

  40. To Coms. on L. GOV. and RLS.

  41. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 28.

  42. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • DeSaulnier · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • DeSaulnier

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SB 406 DeSaulnier Senate Third Reading By TORLAKSON

Passed 54 Yea · 36 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 503401
Republican 1200
Democratic 3000
Total 543601
% of votes cast 59%40%0%1%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Conway — Nay
De — Yea
La — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Cook — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
V. — Nay
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Charles — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Manuel — Nay
Perez — Nay
Audra — Nay
Silva — Nay
Tran — Nay
Adams — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Torlakson — Yea
Villines — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Coto — Yea
Evans — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Unfinished Supp 1 SB406 DeSaulnier Concurrence

Passed 21 Yea · 18 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201701
Democratic 1001
Republican 0100
Total 211802
% of votes cast 51%44%0%5%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Nay
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Nay
Oropeza — Yea
Negrete — Nay
Runner — Nay
Ducheny — Not Voting
Dutton — Nay
Romero — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

SB 406 DeSaulnier Senate Third Reading Amend By TORLAKSON Set #1

Passed 50 Yea · 30 Nay · 11 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4628011
Democratic 3000
Republican 1200
Total 5030011
% of votes cast 55%33%0%12%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
Adams — Nay
Fuentes — Yea
Hall — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Carter — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Charles — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Coto — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Bill — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Tom — Not Voting
De — Not Voting
La — Not Voting
Torre — Not Voting
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Not Voting
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Miller — Nay
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Tran — Nay
Ammiano — Not Voting
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Krekorian — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Villines — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Evans — Not Voting
Davis — Not Voting
DeVore — Nay
Furutani — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 16 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15500
Republican 0100
Democratic 1000
Total 16600
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Audra — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Conway — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Hall — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Hill — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 11 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11500
Republican 0100
Total 11600
% of votes cast 65%35%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Conway — Nay
Galgiani — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Miller — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Eng — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Senate 3rd Reading SB406 DeSaulnier

Passed 21 Yea · 17 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 191602
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 211702
% of votes cast 53%43%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Huff — Nay
Negrete — Nay
Leno — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Nay
Ashburn — Nay
Correa — Nay
Ducheny — Not Voting
Dutton — Nay
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Nay
Walters — Nay
Wright — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 7 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7501
Total 7501
% of votes cast 54%38%0%8%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Wolk — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wyland — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay

Official roll call →

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Runner — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Walters — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety housing environment transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 406 do?
The Planning and Zoning Law establishes the Planning Advisory and Assistance Council in the Office of Planning and Research, and prescribes the membership and duties of the council. This bill would change the designated membership, as specified, of the Planning Advisory and Assistance Council and would require that the council work with the Strategic Growth Council, regional agencies, and cities and counties to facilitate the implementation of regional blueprint plans. The bill would also require the council to develop and propose recommendations to specified state agencies to facilitate coordination between regional blueprint plans, state growth and infrastructure funding plans, and programs that facilitate the implementation of regional blueprint plans. The bill would further require the council to report to the Legislature on regional performance measures, as specified, and on the manner in which state agencies are implementing the 5-year infrastructure plan. The bill would require the council to begin to perform the above functions and duties when sufficient funding, as determined by the council, exists from the revenue transmitted to it by metropolitan planning organizations, councils of governments, or county transportation commissions and subregional councils of governments jointly preparing subregional sustainable communities strategies. Existing law authorizes a local air quality management district, except the Sacramento district, that has been designated by the State Air Resources Board as a state nonattainment area for any pollutant emitted by motor vehicles to levy a fee of up to $6 on motor vehicles registered within the district, subject to specified conditions. Existing law also authorizes the board of the Sacramento district, subject to specified provisions of law or with the approval of the board of supervisors of each county included, in whole or in part, within the district, to adopt a surcharge, not to exceed $6, on the motor vehicle registration fees applicable to all motor vehicles registered in those counties within the Sacramento district whose boards of supervisors have adopted a resolution approving the surcharge, subject to additional specified conditions. The bill would require, upon the request of a municipal planning organization, as defined, a council of governments, as defined, or a county transportation commission and a subregional council of governments jointly preparing a subregional sustainable communities strategy, the Department of Motor Vehicles to increase the fee on motor vehicles within the district, or the surcharge on motor vehicles registered in those counties within the Sacramento district, as the case may be, by $1 or $2. The bill would require the department to transmit the additional fee revenue to the respective entity requesting the increase. The bill would authorize the additional fee amount to be authorized only if the metropolitan planning organization, the council of governments, or the county transportation commission and the subregional council of governments jointly preparing a subregional sustainable communities strategy adopts a resolution, as specified, authorizing the additional fee. The additional fee would be required to apply to an original vehicle registration occurring on or after 6 months following the adoption of the resolution, as specified, and to a renewal of registration with an expiration date on or after that 6-month period. The bill would require that all revenue received by the metropolitan planning organization, the council of governments, or a county transportation commission and a subregional council of governments jointly preparing a subregional sustainable communities strategy pursuant to the above provisions be used solely to develop a sustainable communities strategy or a regional blueprint plan to identify land use strategies to reduce the use of motor vehicles in its jurisdiction and to carry out applicable transportation-related activities necessary to implement the plan, in order to achieve a specified greenhouse gas emission reduction target. The bill would also require that the additional fee revenue that exceeds $1 in specified jurisdictions be used to provide grants to cities, counties, cities and counties, and congestion management agencies for planning and projects related to the implementation of a regional blueprint plan, and 5% of all the revenue it receives from the first $1 of the additional fee to be transmitted to the council for performance of specified functions. The bill would make conforming changes to existing law. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature to update the duties and composition of the Planning Advisory and Assistance Council to assist in the state's land use planning processes by providing funding to support the development and implementation for regional blueprints and related planning and to work with state agencies providing funding for resource protection and local infrastructure to facilitate coordination between state planning and funding decisions and regional blueprints.
Who sponsors SB 406?
SB 406 is sponsored by DeSaulnier.
What is the current status of SB 406?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 406?
Track SB 406 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 406

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 406

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →