California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

AB 958 — Design-build: Metropolitan Water District of Southern California: solar energy systems.

Last action — Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law sets forth requirements for the solicitation and evaluation of bids and the awarding of contracts by public entities for the erection, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any public structure, building, road, or other public improvement. Existing law also authorizes specified state agencies, cities, and counties to implement alternative procedures for the awarding of contracts on a design‑build basis. This bill would authorize the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to enter into design-build contracts for projects involving the design, construction, fabrication, and installation of a solar energy system in excess of $1,000,000, in accordance with specified provisions. The bill would establish a procedure for submitting bids that includes a requirement that design-build entities provide a statement of qualifications submitted to the district that is verified under oath. Because a verification under oath is made under penalty of perjury, the bill would, by requiring a verification, create a new crime and thereby impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the district, if it uses the design-build method on a project, to submit a report to the Legislative Analyst's Office, as specified, and would require the Legislative Analyst's Office to report to the Legislature on the use of the design-build method on or before January 1, 2015. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2016. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.

  2. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

  3. Vetoed by Governor.

  4. Enrolled and to the Governor at 10:30 a.m.

  5. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 49. Noes 26. Page 2909.)

  6. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 48. Noes 27. Page 2889.)

  7. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  8. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 12. Page 2014.)

  9. Read second time. To third reading.

  10. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  11. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 1).

  13. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  14. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  15. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 28. Page 1720.)

  16. Action rescinded and record expunged whereby a final roll call vote was taken.

  17. Read second time. To third reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (May 13).

  19. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. by unanimous consent.

  20. Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.

  21. (Corrected April 23.)

  22. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. Read second time and amended.

  23. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 15).

  24. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and W.,P. & W.

  25. From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.

  26. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Eng · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Eng

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 58 Yea · 28 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 542605
Democratic 3000
Republican 1200
Total 582805
% of votes cast 64%31%0%5%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Carter — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Block — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Tom — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Bill — Not Voting
Garrick — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Cook — Nay
Hall — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Miller — Nay
Adams — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Duvall — Not Voting
Nestande — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Nay
Villines — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Eng — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 24 Yea · 12 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231104
Democratic 1001
Republican 0100
Total 241205
% of votes cast 59%29%0%12%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Nay
Runner — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Ashburn — Not Voting
Harman — Not Voting
Huff — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cogdill — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Not Voting
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 60 Yea · 31 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 542901
Democratic 5000
Republican 1200
Total 603101
% of votes cast 65%34%0%1%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
Carter — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Huber — Yea
Bill — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Gaines — Nay
Audra — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Tran — Nay
Villines — Nay
Adams — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Price — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Feuer — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 15 Yea · 4 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 14302
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 15402
% of votes cast 71%19%0%10%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Hall — Yea
Duvall — Not Voting
Krekorian — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Miller — Nay
Price — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 958 do?
Existing law sets forth requirements for the solicitation and evaluation of bids and the awarding of contracts by public entities for the erection, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any public structure, building, road, or other public improvement. Existing law also authorizes specified state agencies, cities, and counties to implement alternative procedures for the awarding of contracts on a design‑build basis. This bill would authorize the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to enter into design-build contracts for projects involving the design, construction, fabrication, and installation of a solar energy system in excess of $1,000,000, in accordance with specified provisions. The bill would establish a procedure for submitting bids that includes a requirement that design-build entities provide a statement of qualifications submitted to the district that is verified under oath. Because a verification under oath is made under penalty of perjury, the bill would, by requiring a verification, create a new crime and thereby impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the district, if it uses the design-build method on a project, to submit a report to the Legislative Analyst's Office, as specified, and would require the Legislative Analyst's Office to report to the Legislature on the use of the design-build method on or before January 1, 2015. The bill would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2016. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 958?
AB 958 is sponsored by Eng.
What is the current status of AB 958?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 958?
Track AB 958 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 958

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 958

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →