California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 856 — Fertilizing material: organic input material.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 257, Statutes of 2009.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law generally regulates fertilizing materials, as defined, and provides for the licensure of individuals who manufacture or distribute fertilizing materials. This bill would include organic input material, as defined, within the definition of fertilizing material. Existing law provides that there is in the Department of Food and Agriculture a Fertilizer Inspection Advisory Board consisting of 9 persons appointed by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture and composed as specified and with specified functions. This bill would require the secretary, by January 1, 2012, and in consultation with the board, to review certain issues relating to organic input materials and to post the review in a report on the department's Internet Web site. Existing law requires every person who manufactures or distributes fertilizing materials, before engaging in that activity, to obtain a license from the secretary for each plant and business location that he or she operates. Existing law requires a license fee not to exceed $200, and authorizes the secretary to reduce the license fee, as provided. This bill would require the secretary, prior to issuing a license, to require verification that the applicant is a manufacturer or distributor of fertilizing material. The bill would increase the license fee to an amount not to exceed $300. By increasing the amount of fee revenue to be deposited into a continuously appropriated fund, the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, from certain license applicants, this bill would make an appropriation. Existing law requires the registration of each differing label, other than weight or package size, for specialty fertilizer and certain other substances. Existing law requires the registration fee not to exceed $200 per product. This bill would also require registration of each differing label for organic input material, would require the registration fee for organic input material not to exceed $500 per product, and would require the funds generated from the registration of organic input materials to be deposited into the Organic Input Materials Account, which the bill would create in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, and be available only upon appropriation by the Legislature. The bill would provide that registrations may not be issued without a current license. The bill would require the inspection of organic input material manufacturers at least once per year, as provided. Because a violation of provisions relating to fertilizing materials is a misdemeanor, by changing the definition of a crime this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires a tonnage report to be submitted to the secretary semiannually, as provided, and requires the secretary to impose a penalty of $200 on any person who fails to submit a report on or before the due dates. This bill would provide that any tonnage report that is more than 90 days past due is a cause for revocation of the license. Existing law requires every lot, parcel, or package of fertilizing material to have attached to it, or the shipment to be physically accompanied by, a label as required by the secretary, and makes a violation of these provisions an infraction or misdemeanor, as provided. Existing law authorizes the secretary to require proof of labeling statements and claims made for any fertilizing material and to cancel the approval of, or refuse to approve, a fertilizing material label if the secretary determines that adequate proof of label claims does not exist. This bill would delete the specific penalty for a violation of the labeling provisions. The bill would instead require the secretary to cancel the approval of, or refuse to approve, a fertilizing material label if adequate proof of label claims does not exist. By changing the penalty for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law provides that the secretary shall have free access at reasonable times to records, premises, or conveyances used in the manufacture, transportation, importation, distribution, storage, or application of any fertilizing material. This bill would also provide that the secretary has access to production processes used for those purposes. Existing law provides that the secretary shall, at the times and to the extent necessary for the enforcement of these provisions relating to fertilizing material, among other things, take samples of, or make analyses or examinations of, any substance. This bill would also permit the secretary to inspect the fertilizing material manufacturing facilities and take samples at various stages of production for specified purposes. Existing law makes a violation of provisions relating to fertilizing materials a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for the first violation and not less than $500 for each subsequent violation. This bill would increase those fine amounts to not more than $1,000 for the first violation and not less than $1,000 for each subsequent violation. This bill would require the Department of Food and Agriculture to levy a civil penalty against any person who violates the provisions relating to fertilizing materials, as provided. This bill would provide that the department shall be entitled to receive reimbursement from any violator for any reasonable attorney's fees and other related costs in enforcement of these provisions relating to fertilizing materials. By authorizing a new source of revenue to be deposited into a continuously appropriated fund, the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Existing law provides that it is unlawful for any person to manufacture or distribute in this state any fertilizing material without complying with the provisions relating to fertilizing materials or its regulations. This bill would provide that it is unlawful for any person to adulterate, misbrand, or alter any fertilizing material with the result that the fertilizing material would be inconsistent with the label claims, and would make the violation of this provision a misdemeanor punishable by specified fines. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also authorize the secretary to prohibit a person who violates this provision or a certain other provision relating to the distribution of adulterated fertilizing material from obtaining a license to sell organic input materials for 3 years. Existing law provides that the movement, distribution, or sale of all or part of any product that has been quarantined by the secretary, unless the movement, distribution, or sale has the prior approval of the secretary, is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $500 and a fine of not less than $1,000 for a 2nd or subsequent violation. This bill would also make a violation of that provision subject to a civil penalty and would increase those misdemeanor fine amounts to not more than $5,000 for the first violation and not less than $10,000 for a 2nd or subsequent violation. Existing law prohibits a person from distributing an adulterated fertilizing material and provides specified conditions under which a fertilizing material will be deemed to be adulterated. This bill would include as another condition if an organic input material contains ingredients that, in type or amount, do not comply with certain federal standards requirements. Because a violation of provisions relating to fertilizing materials is a misdemeanor, by changing the definition of a crime this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would also make conforming, clarifying, and technical changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 257, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 11:30 a.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3348.)

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  6. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 2161.)

  7. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 24).

  9. (Corrected September 1.)

  10. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  12. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  13. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 7).

  14. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on F. & A. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (July 6).

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on EQ.

  16. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  17. Referred to Coms. on EQ. and F. & A.

  18. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  19. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1883.)

  20. Read second time. To third reading.

  21. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).

  22. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  23. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 29).

  24. Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.

  25. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.

  26. Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.

  27. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.

  28. Referred to Coms. on AGRI. and PUB. S.

  29. From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.

  30. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Caballero

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 90 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 84001
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 90001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
John — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Charles — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hill — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Coto — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bass — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Huber — Yea
Knight — Not Voting
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Yea
A. — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33005
Republican 1000
Democratic 1001
Total 35006
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Huff — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Runner — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Cogdill — Not Voting
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Not Voting
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11002
Total 11002
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Yea
Leno — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 88 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 82004
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 88004
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Charles — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Huber — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Price — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Audra — Yea
DeVore — Not Voting
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Not Voting
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Eng — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 22 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20000
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 22000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Davis — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Price — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 856 do?
Existing law generally regulates fertilizing materials, as defined, and provides for the licensure of individuals who manufacture or distribute fertilizing materials. This bill would include organic input material, as defined, within the definition of fertilizing material. Existing law provides that there is in the Department of Food and Agriculture a Fertilizer Inspection Advisory Board consisting of 9 persons appointed by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture and composed as specified and with specified functions. This bill would require the secretary, by January 1, 2012, and in consultation with the board, to review certain issues relating to organic input materials and to post the review in a report on the department's Internet Web site. Existing law requires every person who manufactures or distributes fertilizing materials, before engaging in that activity, to obtain a license from the secretary for each plant and business location that he or she operates. Existing law requires a license fee not to exceed $200, and authorizes the secretary to reduce the license fee, as provided. This bill would require the secretary, prior to issuing a license, to require verification that the applicant is a manufacturer or distributor of fertilizing material. The bill would increase the license fee to an amount not to exceed $300. By increasing the amount of fee revenue to be deposited into a continuously appropriated fund, the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, from certain license applicants, this bill would make an appropriation. Existing law requires the registration of each differing label, other than weight or package size, for specialty fertilizer and certain other substances. Existing law requires the registration fee not to exceed $200 per product. This bill would also require registration of each differing label for organic input material, would require the registration fee for organic input material not to exceed $500 per product, and would require the funds generated from the registration of organic input materials to be deposited into the Organic Input Materials Account, which the bill would create in the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, and be available only upon appropriation by the Legislature. The bill would provide that registrations may not be issued without a current license. The bill would require the inspection of organic input material manufacturers at least once per year, as provided. Because a violation of provisions relating to fertilizing materials is a misdemeanor, by changing the definition of a crime this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law requires a tonnage report to be submitted to the secretary semiannually, as provided, and requires the secretary to impose a penalty of $200 on any person who fails to submit a report on or before the due dates. This bill would provide that any tonnage report that is more than 90 days past due is a cause for revocation of the license. Existing law requires every lot, parcel, or package of fertilizing material to have attached to it, or the shipment to be physically accompanied by, a label as required by the secretary, and makes a violation of these provisions an infraction or misdemeanor, as provided. Existing law authorizes the secretary to require proof of labeling statements and claims made for any fertilizing material and to cancel the approval of, or refuse to approve, a fertilizing material label if the secretary determines that adequate proof of label claims does not exist. This bill would delete the specific penalty for a violation of the labeling provisions. The bill would instead require the secretary to cancel the approval of, or refuse to approve, a fertilizing material label if adequate proof of label claims does not exist. By changing the penalty for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law provides that the secretary shall have free access at reasonable times to records, premises, or conveyances used in the manufacture, transportation, importation, distribution, storage, or application of any fertilizing material. This bill would also provide that the secretary has access to production processes used for those purposes. Existing law provides that the secretary shall, at the times and to the extent necessary for the enforcement of these provisions relating to fertilizing material, among other things, take samples of, or make analyses or examinations of, any substance. This bill would also permit the secretary to inspect the fertilizing material manufacturing facilities and take samples at various stages of production for specified purposes. Existing law makes a violation of provisions relating to fertilizing materials a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for the first violation and not less than $500 for each subsequent violation. This bill would increase those fine amounts to not more than $1,000 for the first violation and not less than $1,000 for each subsequent violation. This bill would require the Department of Food and Agriculture to levy a civil penalty against any person who violates the provisions relating to fertilizing materials, as provided. This bill would provide that the department shall be entitled to receive reimbursement from any violator for any reasonable attorney's fees and other related costs in enforcement of these provisions relating to fertilizing materials. By authorizing a new source of revenue to be deposited into a continuously appropriated fund, the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Existing law provides that it is unlawful for any person to manufacture or distribute in this state any fertilizing material without complying with the provisions relating to fertilizing materials or its regulations. This bill would provide that it is unlawful for any person to adulterate, misbrand, or alter any fertilizing material with the result that the fertilizing material would be inconsistent with the label claims, and would make the violation of this provision a misdemeanor punishable by specified fines. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would also authorize the secretary to prohibit a person who violates this provision or a certain other provision relating to the distribution of adulterated fertilizing material from obtaining a license to sell organic input materials for 3 years. Existing law provides that the movement, distribution, or sale of all or part of any product that has been quarantined by the secretary, unless the movement, distribution, or sale has the prior approval of the secretary, is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $500 and a fine of not less than $1,000 for a 2nd or subsequent violation. This bill would also make a violation of that provision subject to a civil penalty and would increase those misdemeanor fine amounts to not more than $5,000 for the first violation and not less than $10,000 for a 2nd or subsequent violation. Existing law prohibits a person from distributing an adulterated fertilizing material and provides specified conditions under which a fertilizing material will be deemed to be adulterated. This bill would include as another condition if an organic input material contains ingredients that, in type or amount, do not comply with certain federal standards requirements. Because a violation of provisions relating to fertilizing materials is a misdemeanor, by changing the definition of a crime this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would also make conforming, clarifying, and technical changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 856?
AB 856 is sponsored by Caballero and Bill Berryhill.
What is the current status of AB 856?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 856?
Track AB 856 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 856

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 856

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →