AB 110 — Parks and open space: Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor: boundary revisions.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 407, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 13, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides that, if the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy determines, based on relevant scientific information and land use planning studies, that a revision of the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor in the vicinity of Placerita Canyon State Park east of Route 14, including Whitney Canyon, is necessary, the executive director of the conservancy is required to prepare and file with the Secretary of State and specified committees of the Legislature, a revised map showing the changes in the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor. This bill, instead, would authorize the conservancy to revise the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor in the vicinity of the City of Santa Clarita, including Whitney Canyon, Elsmere Canyon, and their adjacent watersheds. An owner of property located in Elsmere Canyon would be authorized to request of the conservancy that his or her property be included within the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor. The conservancy, upon receipt of the request, would be authorized, in accordance with specified procedures, to revise the map showing the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor to include the property in Elsmere Canyon that is the subject of the request. The bill would provide that the above authorization to the property owner would not affect inclusion of the property in the corridor pursuant to other provisions of law. (2) Existing law prohibits the provision related to the revision of boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor from being interpreted to affect any portion of Elsmere Canyon, or from affecting the decision of whether to permit Elsmere Canyon as a solid waste facility. The bill would delete that provision. (3) The bill also would make a technical, nonsubstantive change.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/09/09 - Enrolled pdf September 09, 2009
- Introduced 01/13/09 - Introduced pdf January 13, 2009
- AB110 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 407, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 5 p.m.
-
In Assembly. To enrollment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 4. Page 2122.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(received by desk August 28, 2009 pursuant to JR61(a)(11))
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 27).
-
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on RLS. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (June 23).
-
Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and RLS.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 1. Page 1831.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 13).
-
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 13.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Runner · Cosponsor
- Smyth · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Smyth
Co-sponsors (1)
- Runner
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 10% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 9% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 82 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 88 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 1% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 5% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 110 do?
- (1) Existing law provides that, if the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy determines, based on relevant scientific information and land use planning studies, that a revision of the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor in the vicinity of Placerita Canyon State Park east of Route 14, including Whitney Canyon, is necessary, the executive director of the conservancy is required to prepare and file with the Secretary of State and specified committees of the Legislature, a revised map showing the changes in the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor. This bill, instead, would authorize the conservancy to revise the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor in the vicinity of the City of Santa Clarita, including Whitney Canyon, Elsmere Canyon, and their adjacent watersheds. An owner of property located in Elsmere Canyon would be authorized to request of the conservancy that his or her property be included within the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor. The conservancy, upon receipt of the request, would be authorized, in accordance with specified procedures, to revise the map showing the boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor to include the property in Elsmere Canyon that is the subject of the request. The bill would provide that the above authorization to the property owner would not affect inclusion of the property in the corridor pursuant to other provisions of law. (2) Existing law prohibits the provision related to the revision of boundaries of the Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor from being interpreted to affect any portion of Elsmere Canyon, or from affecting the decision of whether to permit Elsmere Canyon as a solid waste facility. The bill would delete that provision. (3) The bill also would make a technical, nonsubstantive change.
- Who sponsors AB 110?
- AB 110 is sponsored by Runner and Smyth.
- What is the current status of AB 110?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 13, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 110?
- Track AB 110 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 110
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 110
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →