AB 646 — Physicians and surgeons: employment.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Medical Practice Act, restricts the employment of licensed physicians and surgeons and podiatrists by a corporation or other artificial legal entity, subject to specified exemptions, and makes it a crime to practice medicine without a license. Existing law establishes, until January 1, 2011, a pilot project to allow qualified district hospitals that, among other things, provide more than 50% of patient days to the care of Medicare, Medi-Cal, and uninsured patients, to employ a physician and surgeon, if the hospital does not interfere with, control, or otherwise direct the professional judgment of the physician and surgeon. The pilot project authorizes the direct employment of a total of 20 physicians and surgeons by those hospitals to provide medically necessary services in rural and medically underserved communities, and specifies that each qualified district hospital may employ up to 2 physicians and surgeons, subject to specified requirements. This bill would delete that pilot project and would instead, until January 1, 2021, authorize a health care district, as defined, and a clinic owned or operated by a health care district, as specified, to employ physicians and surgeons if the health care district's service area includes a Medically Underserved Area (MUA) or a Medically Underserved Population (MUP) , or has been federally designated as a Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) ; the district board conducts a public hearing and adopts a specified resolution declaring the need for the district to recruit and directly employ one or more physicians and surgeons; and the executive officer of the district provides specified documentation to the Medical Board of California. Upon receipt of that documentation, the bill would require the board to approve the employment of up to 5 primary or specialty care physicians and surgeons by the district, and, upon receipt of additional documentation after that employment, to approve an additional 5 primary or specialty care physicians and surgeons. The bill would provide that a district may, until December 31, 2020, enter into, renew, or extend any employment contract with a physician and surgeon for up to 10 years. The bill would require the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, in consultation with the State Department of Public Health and the board, to report to the Legislature by June 1, 2018, with regard to the efficacy of the employment of physicians and surgeons by health care districts, as specified.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/13/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf April 13, 2010
- Amended 05/05/09 - Amended Assembly pdf May 05, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/25/09 - Introduced pdf February 25, 2009
- AB646 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
-
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 57. Noes 15. Page 1739.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 20).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 28).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (April 21).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 28.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Josh Lowenthal · Cosponsor
- Beall · Cosponsor
- Buchanan · Cosponsor
- Chesbro · Cosponsor
- De Leon · Cosponsor
- Portantino · Cosponsor
- Salas · Cosponsor
- Coto · Cosponsor
- DeSaulnier · Cosponsor
- Evans · Cosponsor
- Fuentes · Cosponsor
- Furutani · Cosponsor
- Hall · Cosponsor
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
- Lieu · Cosponsor
- Ma · Cosponsor
- Mendoza · Cosponsor
- Nava · Cosponsor
- Price · Cosponsor
- Romero · Cosponsor
- Skinner · Cosponsor
- Swanson · Primary
- Torres · Cosponsor
- Wiggins · Cosponsor
- Yee · Cosponsor
- Mike Fong · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 25 co-sponsors · 96 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Swanson
Co-sponsors (25)
- Lowenthal, Josh Democratic
- Beall
- Buchanan
- Chesbro
- De Leon
- Portantino
- Salas
- Coto
- DeSaulnier
- Evans
- Fuentes
- Furutani
- Hall
- Jeffries
- Lieu
- Ma
- Mendoza
- Nava
- Price
- Romero
- Skinner
- Torres
- Wiggins
- Yee
- Fong, Mike Democratic
Not signed on (96)
96 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 96 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 20% | 0% | 30% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 27% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 62 | 15 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 69 | 15 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 16% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 0% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 31% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Nay |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 646 do?
- Existing law, the Medical Practice Act, restricts the employment of licensed physicians and surgeons and podiatrists by a corporation or other artificial legal entity, subject to specified exemptions, and makes it a crime to practice medicine without a license. Existing law establishes, until January 1, 2011, a pilot project to allow qualified district hospitals that, among other things, provide more than 50% of patient days to the care of Medicare, Medi-Cal, and uninsured patients, to employ a physician and surgeon, if the hospital does not interfere with, control, or otherwise direct the professional judgment of the physician and surgeon. The pilot project authorizes the direct employment of a total of 20 physicians and surgeons by those hospitals to provide medically necessary services in rural and medically underserved communities, and specifies that each qualified district hospital may employ up to 2 physicians and surgeons, subject to specified requirements. This bill would delete that pilot project and would instead, until January 1, 2021, authorize a health care district, as defined, and a clinic owned or operated by a health care district, as specified, to employ physicians and surgeons if the health care district's service area includes a Medically Underserved Area (MUA) or a Medically Underserved Population (MUP) , or has been federally designated as a Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) ; the district board conducts a public hearing and adopts a specified resolution declaring the need for the district to recruit and directly employ one or more physicians and surgeons; and the executive officer of the district provides specified documentation to the Medical Board of California. Upon receipt of that documentation, the bill would require the board to approve the employment of up to 5 primary or specialty care physicians and surgeons by the district, and, upon receipt of additional documentation after that employment, to approve an additional 5 primary or specialty care physicians and surgeons. The bill would provide that a district may, until December 31, 2020, enter into, renew, or extend any employment contract with a physician and surgeon for up to 10 years. The bill would require the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, in consultation with the State Department of Public Health and the board, to report to the Legislature by June 1, 2018, with regard to the efficacy of the employment of physicians and surgeons by health care districts, as specified.
- Who sponsors AB 646?
- AB 646 is sponsored by Lowenthal, Josh (Democratic), Beall, Buchanan, Chesbro, De Leon, Portantino, Salas, Coto, DeSaulnier, Evans, Fuentes, Furutani, Hall, Jeffries, Lieu, Ma, Mendoza, Nava, Price, Romero, Skinner, Swanson, Torres, Wiggins, Yee, and Fong, Mike (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 646?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 646?
- Track AB 646 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 646
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 646
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →