Common interest developments: artificial turf.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1793 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1793.
You're tracking AB 1793
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1793 — Common interest developments: artificial turf.
Last action — Vetoed by Governor.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires a local agency to adopt a specified updated model ordinance regarding water-efficient landscapes or a water-efficient landscape ordinance that is at least as effective in conserving water as the updated model ordinance. Existing law allows certain water providers to take specified actions regarding water conservation. The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act provides for the creation and regulation of common interest developments. That act provides that a provision of any of the governing documents of a common interest development is void and unenforceable if it prohibits, or includes conditions that have the effect of prohibiting, the use of low water-using plants as a group, or if it has the effect of prohibiting or restricting compliance with a local water-efficient landscape ordinance or water conservation measure as described above. This bill would provide that a provision of any of the governing documents of a common interest development would be void and unenforceable if it prohibits, or includes conditions that have the effect of prohibiting, the use of artificial turf or any other synthetic surface that resembles grass. This prohibition would not prohibit an association from applying landscape rules and regulations established in governing documents that establish design standards and quality standards for the installation of artificial turf, or any other synthetic surface that resembles grass, to the extent the rules and regulations do not prohibit the use of artificial turf or any other synthetic surface that resembles grass.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 08/20/10 - Enrolled Current pdf August 20, 2010
- Amended 04/20/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 20, 2010
- Introduced 02/10/10 - Introduced pdf February 10, 2010
- AB1793 View text html
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:45 p.m.
-
In Assembly. To enrollment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 22. Noes 10. Page 4579.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (June 15).
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 69. Noes 1. Page 4812.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 14).
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 11).
-
Re-referred to Com. on RULES by unanimous consent.
-
Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Saldana · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Saldana
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 26% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 74 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 1% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Not Voting |
| A. | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Huber | — | Not Voting |
| Bass | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gilmore | — | Not Voting |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Not Voting |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1793 do?
- Existing law requires a local agency to adopt a specified updated model ordinance regarding water-efficient landscapes or a water-efficient landscape ordinance that is at least as effective in conserving water as the updated model ordinance. Existing law allows certain water providers to take specified actions regarding water conservation. The Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act provides for the creation and regulation of common interest developments. That act provides that a provision of any of the governing documents of a common interest development is void and unenforceable if it prohibits, or includes conditions that have the effect of prohibiting, the use of low water-using plants as a group, or if it has the effect of prohibiting or restricting compliance with a local water-efficient landscape ordinance or water conservation measure as described above. This bill would provide that a provision of any of the governing documents of a common interest development would be void and unenforceable if it prohibits, or includes conditions that have the effect of prohibiting, the use of artificial turf or any other synthetic surface that resembles grass. This prohibition would not prohibit an association from applying landscape rules and regulations established in governing documents that establish design standards and quality standards for the installation of artificial turf, or any other synthetic surface that resembles grass, to the extent the rules and regulations do not prohibit the use of artificial turf or any other synthetic surface that resembles grass.
- Who sponsors AB 1793?
- AB 1793 is sponsored by Saldana.
- What is the current status of AB 1793?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1793?
- Track AB 1793 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1793
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1793
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →