California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 2183 — State contracts: reciprocal preference.

Last action — From committee without further action.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires a state agency, in awarding contracts for construction, to grant a California company, as defined, a reciprocal preference as against a nonresident contractor from any state that gives or requires a preference to be given to contractors from that state on its public entity construction contracts, as specified. This bill would require a state agency, in awarding a contract for good or services, to grant a resident bidder, as defined, a reciprocal preference as against a nonresident bidder from any state that gives or requires a preference to be given to contractors from that state, as specified. This bill would provide that its provisions do not apply if their application might jeopardize the receipt of federal funds or if the nonresident bidder certifies, under penalty of perjury, in its bid that its state of residency does not give a preference for contractors from that state in the award of its contracts. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

1 line(s) added, 1 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBill Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill Text PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. From committee without further action.

  2. Referred to Com. on B. & P.

  3. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  4. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Smyth · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Smyth

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2183 do?
Existing law requires a state agency, in awarding contracts for construction, to grant a California company, as defined, a reciprocal preference as against a nonresident contractor from any state that gives or requires a preference to be given to contractors from that state on its public entity construction contracts, as specified. This bill would require a state agency, in awarding a contract for good or services, to grant a resident bidder, as defined, a reciprocal preference as against a nonresident bidder from any state that gives or requires a preference to be given to contractors from that state, as specified. This bill would provide that its provisions do not apply if their application might jeopardize the receipt of federal funds or if the nonresident bidder certifies, under penalty of perjury, in its bid that its state of residency does not give a preference for contractors from that state in the award of its contracts. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors AB 2183?
AB 2183 is sponsored by Smyth.
What is the current status of AB 2183?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2183?
Track AB 2183 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2183

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2183

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →