California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 741 — Proprietary security services.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 361, Statutes of 2009.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, the Proprietary Security Services Act, requires a person who meets the definition of a proprietary private security officer to register with the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires a proprietary private security officer to complete training in security officer skills within a specified period of time. Existing law authorizes, except as otherwise specified, a registered person to request review by a private security disciplinary review committee, to contest the assessment of fines or to appeal the denial, revocation, or suspension of a registration. Existing law, when certain conditions are met, makes it an infraction to violate various provisions requiring registration, licensure, certification, or other authorization in order to engage in certain businesses or professions. This bill would revise and recast these provisions by requiring, on and after January 1, 2011, proprietary private security officers and proprietary private security employers, as defined, to register with the department. The bill would require applicants for registration to apply to the department on forms provided by the department and would require these applications to include, among other things, a $50 fee for officers and a $75 fee for employers as well as fingerprints for the officer application. The bill would require that, upon approval of an application by the Director of Consumer Affairs, officer and employer applicants be issued a registration card or registration certificate, respectively. The bill would, on and after July 1, 2011, require registered proprietary private security officers to complete training in security officer skills within 6 months from the date upon which registration is issued, or within 6 months of his or her employment with a proprietary private security employer, as specified. The bill would require registered proprietary private security employers to maintain specified records regarding the employment of officers and the completion by officers of training in security officer skills. The bill would also require these officers on duty to carry a valid and current registration card or a specified alternative as well as other identification. The bill would authorize the director to issue a citation, which may include an order of abatement or an order to pay an administrative fine, for a violation of these provisions by a registrant or a person without a valid registration who is acting as a proprietary private security officer or employer. The bill would authorize the director to refuse to approve, or to suspend or revoke, a registration if the applicant or registrant has committed specified acts or crimes. The bill would also, when certain conditions are met, make it an infraction to violate the provision prohibiting a person from engaging in the business of a proprietary private security officer without being registered by the department. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 361, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 9 p.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 29. Noes 3. Page 2117.) To enrollment.

  5. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 65. Noes 5. Page 2674.) To Senate.

  7. Read third time. Amended. (Page 2616.) To third reading.

  8. Read second time. To third reading.

  9. (Heard in committee on July 15.)

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.)

  11. (Heard in committee on June 30.)

  12. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.

  14. To Com. on B. & P.

  15. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  16. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 3. Page 887.) To Assembly.

  17. Read second time. To third reading.

  18. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 754.)

  19. Set for hearing May 4.

  20. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. Withdrawn from committee.

  22. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 581.) Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  23. Set for hearing April 20.

  24. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  25. Re-referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and PUB. S.

  26. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  27. To Com. on RLS.

  28. Read first time.

  29. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.

  30. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Maldonado · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Maldonado

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 30 Yea · 3 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 27308
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 30308
% of votes cast 73%7%0%20%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Huff — Nay
Leno — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Not Voting
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 76 Yea · 6 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 72508
Republican 2100
Democratic 2001
Total 76609
% of votes cast 84%7%0%10%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Bass — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Not Voting
Villines — Not Voting
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Nay
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Evans — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Coto — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Adams — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Jeffries — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 16 Yea · 2 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15103
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 16203
% of votes cast 76%10%0%14%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Coto — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Skinner — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 35 Yea · 3 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31302
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 35302
% of votes cast 88%8%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Nay
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10003
Total 10003
% of votes cast 77%0%0%23%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Runner — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Leno — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Not Voting
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9101
Total 9101
% of votes cast 82%9%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Walters — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Oropeza — Yea
Romero — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Florez — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 741 do?
Existing law, the Proprietary Security Services Act, requires a person who meets the definition of a proprietary private security officer to register with the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires a proprietary private security officer to complete training in security officer skills within a specified period of time. Existing law authorizes, except as otherwise specified, a registered person to request review by a private security disciplinary review committee, to contest the assessment of fines or to appeal the denial, revocation, or suspension of a registration. Existing law, when certain conditions are met, makes it an infraction to violate various provisions requiring registration, licensure, certification, or other authorization in order to engage in certain businesses or professions. This bill would revise and recast these provisions by requiring, on and after January 1, 2011, proprietary private security officers and proprietary private security employers, as defined, to register with the department. The bill would require applicants for registration to apply to the department on forms provided by the department and would require these applications to include, among other things, a $50 fee for officers and a $75 fee for employers as well as fingerprints for the officer application. The bill would require that, upon approval of an application by the Director of Consumer Affairs, officer and employer applicants be issued a registration card or registration certificate, respectively. The bill would, on and after July 1, 2011, require registered proprietary private security officers to complete training in security officer skills within 6 months from the date upon which registration is issued, or within 6 months of his or her employment with a proprietary private security employer, as specified. The bill would require registered proprietary private security employers to maintain specified records regarding the employment of officers and the completion by officers of training in security officer skills. The bill would also require these officers on duty to carry a valid and current registration card or a specified alternative as well as other identification. The bill would authorize the director to issue a citation, which may include an order of abatement or an order to pay an administrative fine, for a violation of these provisions by a registrant or a person without a valid registration who is acting as a proprietary private security officer or employer. The bill would authorize the director to refuse to approve, or to suspend or revoke, a registration if the applicant or registrant has committed specified acts or crimes. The bill would also, when certain conditions are met, make it an infraction to violate the provision prohibiting a person from engaging in the business of a proprietary private security officer without being registered by the department. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 741?
SB 741 is sponsored by Maldonado.
What is the current status of SB 741?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 741?
Track SB 741 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 741

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 741

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →