SB 741 — Proprietary security services.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 361, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Proprietary Security Services Act, requires a person who meets the definition of a proprietary private security officer to register with the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires a proprietary private security officer to complete training in security officer skills within a specified period of time. Existing law authorizes, except as otherwise specified, a registered person to request review by a private security disciplinary review committee, to contest the assessment of fines or to appeal the denial, revocation, or suspension of a registration. Existing law, when certain conditions are met, makes it an infraction to violate various provisions requiring registration, licensure, certification, or other authorization in order to engage in certain businesses or professions. This bill would revise and recast these provisions by requiring, on and after January 1, 2011, proprietary private security officers and proprietary private security employers, as defined, to register with the department. The bill would require applicants for registration to apply to the department on forms provided by the department and would require these applications to include, among other things, a $50 fee for officers and a $75 fee for employers as well as fingerprints for the officer application. The bill would require that, upon approval of an application by the Director of Consumer Affairs, officer and employer applicants be issued a registration card or registration certificate, respectively. The bill would, on and after July 1, 2011, require registered proprietary private security officers to complete training in security officer skills within 6 months from the date upon which registration is issued, or within 6 months of his or her employment with a proprietary private security employer, as specified. The bill would require registered proprietary private security employers to maintain specified records regarding the employment of officers and the completion by officers of training in security officer skills. The bill would also require these officers on duty to carry a valid and current registration card or a specified alternative as well as other identification. The bill would authorize the director to issue a citation, which may include an order of abatement or an order to pay an administrative fine, for a violation of these provisions by a registrant or a person without a valid registration who is acting as a proprietary private security officer or employer. The bill would authorize the director to refuse to approve, or to suspend or revoke, a registration if the applicant or registrant has committed specified acts or crimes. The bill would also, when certain conditions are met, make it an infraction to violate the provision prohibiting a person from engaging in the business of a proprietary private security officer without being registered by the department. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/04/09 - Enrolled pdf September 04, 2009
- Amended 08/17/09 - Amended Assembly pdf August 17, 2009
- Amended 06/23/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 23, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 13, 2009
- Amended 03/31/09 - Amended Senate pdf March 31, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- SB741 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 361, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 9 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 29. Noes 3. Page 2117.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 65. Noes 5. Page 2674.) To Senate.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 2616.) To third reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(Heard in committee on July 15.)
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.)
-
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
To Com. on B. & P.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 3. Page 887.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 754.)
-
Set for hearing May 4.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 581.) Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Set for hearing April 20.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and PUB. S.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Maldonado · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Maldonado
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 7% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 72 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 76 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 84% | 7% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Not Voting |
| Villines | — | Not Voting |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 10% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Conway | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 8% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 0% | 0% | 23% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 9% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 741 do?
- Existing law, the Proprietary Security Services Act, requires a person who meets the definition of a proprietary private security officer to register with the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires a proprietary private security officer to complete training in security officer skills within a specified period of time. Existing law authorizes, except as otherwise specified, a registered person to request review by a private security disciplinary review committee, to contest the assessment of fines or to appeal the denial, revocation, or suspension of a registration. Existing law, when certain conditions are met, makes it an infraction to violate various provisions requiring registration, licensure, certification, or other authorization in order to engage in certain businesses or professions. This bill would revise and recast these provisions by requiring, on and after January 1, 2011, proprietary private security officers and proprietary private security employers, as defined, to register with the department. The bill would require applicants for registration to apply to the department on forms provided by the department and would require these applications to include, among other things, a $50 fee for officers and a $75 fee for employers as well as fingerprints for the officer application. The bill would require that, upon approval of an application by the Director of Consumer Affairs, officer and employer applicants be issued a registration card or registration certificate, respectively. The bill would, on and after July 1, 2011, require registered proprietary private security officers to complete training in security officer skills within 6 months from the date upon which registration is issued, or within 6 months of his or her employment with a proprietary private security employer, as specified. The bill would require registered proprietary private security employers to maintain specified records regarding the employment of officers and the completion by officers of training in security officer skills. The bill would also require these officers on duty to carry a valid and current registration card or a specified alternative as well as other identification. The bill would authorize the director to issue a citation, which may include an order of abatement or an order to pay an administrative fine, for a violation of these provisions by a registrant or a person without a valid registration who is acting as a proprietary private security officer or employer. The bill would authorize the director to refuse to approve, or to suspend or revoke, a registration if the applicant or registrant has committed specified acts or crimes. The bill would also, when certain conditions are met, make it an infraction to violate the provision prohibiting a person from engaging in the business of a proprietary private security officer without being registered by the department. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 741?
- SB 741 is sponsored by Maldonado.
- What is the current status of SB 741?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 741?
- Track SB 741 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 741
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 741
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →