SB 32 — Renewable electric generation facilities.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 328, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission is vested with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. The Public Utilities Act imposes various duties and responsibilities on the commission with respect to the purchase of electricity by electrical corporations and requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan and a renewable energy procurement plan for each electrical corporation pursuant to the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. The program requires that a retail seller of electricity, including electrical corporations, purchase a specified minimum percentage of electricity generated by eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, in any given year as a specified percentage of total kilowatthours sold to retail end-use customers each calendar year (renewables portfolio standard) . Under existing law, the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility is responsible for implementing and enforcing a renewables portfolio standard for the utility that recognizes the intent of the Legislature to encourage renewable resources, while taking into consideration the effect of the standard on rates, reliability, and financial resources and the goal of environmental improvement. Existing law requires every electrical corporation to file with the commission a standard tariff for electricity generated by an electric generation facility, as defined, that is owned and operated by a retail customer of the electrical corporation. Existing law requires that the electric generation facility: (1) have an effective capacity of not more than 1.5 megawatts and be located on property owned or under the control of the customer, (2) be interconnected and operate in parallel with the electric transmission and distribution grid, (3) be strategically located and interconnected to the electric transmission system in a manner that optimizes the deliverability of electricity generated at the facility to load centers, and (4) meet the definition of an eligible renewable energy resource under the renewables portfolio standard program. Existing law requires that the tariff provide for payment for every kilowatthour of electricity generated by an electric generation facility at a market price referent established by the commission pursuant to the renewables portfolio standard program. Existing law requires the electrical corporation to make this tariff available to customers that own and operate an electric generation facility within the service territory of the electrical corporation, upon request, on a first-come-first-served basis, until the combined statewide cumulative rated generating capacity of those electric generation facilities equals 500 megawatts, or the electrical corporation meets its proportionate share of the 500 megawatt limit based upon the ratio of its peak demand to total statewide peak demand of all electrical corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to modify or adjust the above-described requirements for any electrical corporation with less than 100,000 service connections, as individual circumstances merit. Existing law provides that the electricity generated by an electric generation facility counts toward the electrical corporation's renewables portfolio standard and provides that the physical generating capacity counts toward meeting the electrical corporation's resource adequacy requirements. This bill would require an electrical corporation to file with the commission a standard tariff for the electricity purchased from an electric generation facility that is located within the service territory of, and developed to sell electricity to, the electrical corporation. The bill would revise the first requirement, discussed above, to instead require that the electric generation facility have an effective capacity of not more than 3 megawatts, subject to the authority of the commission to reduce this megawatt limitation, discussed below, and would delete the requirement that the facility be located on property owned or under the control of the customer. The bill would require that the tariff provide for payment for every kilowatthour of electricity purchased from an electric generation facility for a period of 10, 15, or 20 years, as authorized by the commission. The bill would require that the payment be the market price referent established by the commission pursuant to the renewables portfolio standard program and would require the price to include all current and anticipated environmental compliance costs. The bill would authorize the commission to adjust the payment to reflect the value of the electricity on a time-of-delivery basis and require, with respect to rates and charges, that ratepayers that do not receive service pursuant to the tariff are indifferent to whether other ratepayers receive service pursuant to the tariff. The bill would require an electrical corporation to provide expedited interconnection procedures to an electric generation facility located on a distribution circuit that offsets peak demand on that circuit, if the electrical corporation determines that the electric generation facility will not adversely affect the distribution grid. The bill would require the electrical corporation to make the tariff available to the owner or operator of an electric generation facility within the service territory of the electrical corporation, upon request, on a first-come-first-served basis, until either the corporation meets its proportionate share of a statewide cap of 750 megawatts cumulative rated generation capacity served under the tariffs adopted pursuant to the requirements of the bill or the electrical corporation has reached or exceeds its above-market cost limitation, as specified. The bill would make this requirement contingent on certain conditions relating to the enactment of SB 14, and would provide an alternate requirement if those conditions do not occur. The bill would provide that the electricity purchased from an electric generation facility counts toward meeting the electrical corporation's renewables portfolio standard and that the physical generating capacity of the electric generation facility counts toward meeting the electrical corporation's resource adequacy requirements. The bill would require the commission to establish performance standards for any electric generation facility that has a capacity greater than one megawatt to ensure that those facilities are constructed, operated, and maintained to generate the expected annual net production of electricity and do not impact system reliability, and would authorize the commission to reduce the 3 megawatt capacity limitation if the commission finds that a reduced capacity limitation is necessary to maintain system reliability within that electrical corporation's service territory. The bill would recast the existing authority of the commission to modify or adjust the above-described requirements for any electrical corporation with less than 100,000 service connections, as individual circumstances merit. This bill would provide that an owner or operator of an electric generation facility that received ratepayer-funded incentives and participated in a net metering program prior to January 1, 2010, would be eligible for a tariff or standard contract filed by an electrical corporation pursuant to the above-described provisions, but would require the commission to require reimbursement of funds in some circumstances. An owner or operator that receives service pursuant to a tariff or standard contract adopted by an electrical corporation pursuant to the above-described provisions is not eligible to participate in any net metering program. This bill would require a local publicly owned electric utility that sells electricity at retail to 75,000 or more customers to adopt and implement a tariff for electricity purchased from an electric generation facility meeting certain size, deliverability, and interconnection requirements and to consider certain factors. The bill would require the local publicly owned electric utility to make the tariff available to owners and operators of an electric generation facility within the service territory of the utility, upon request, on a first-come-first-served basis, until the utility meets its proportionate share of a statewide cap of 750 megawatts cumulative rated generation capacity served under the tariffs adopted pursuant to the requirements of this bill. The bill would provide that the electricity purchased from an electric generation facility counts towards meeting the local publicly owned electric utility's renewables portfolio standard annual procurement targets. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or an order or direction of the commission is a crime. Because this bill would require an order or other action of the commission to implement its provisions, and a violation of that order or action would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. By placing additional requirements upon local publicly owned electric utilities, which are entities of local government, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/15/09 - Enrolled pdf September 15, 2009
- Amended 09/04/09 - Amended Assembly pdf September 04, 2009
- Amended 08/31/09 - Amended Assembly pdf August 31, 2009
- Amended 07/13/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 13, 2009
- Amended 07/01/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 01, 2009
- Amended 06/02/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 02, 2009
- Amended 04/29/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 29, 2009
- Amended 04/14/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 14, 2009
- Introduced 12/02/08 - Introduced pdf December 02, 2008
- SB32 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 328, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 10:30 a.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2419.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 62. Noes 16. Page 3333.) To Senate.
-
Placed on third reading.
-
Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
Re-referred to Com. On U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 3038.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
-
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.)
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.)
-
(Heard in committee on July 6.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
To Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 1184.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 1067.)
-
(Suspense - for vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 18.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 583.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Set for hearing April 21.
-
To Com. on E., U. & C.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after January 2.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Carter · Cosponsor
- Negrete McLeod · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Negrete McLeod
Co-sponsors (1)
- Carter
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 74 | 16 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 18% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 14% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 10% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 31% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 32 do?
- Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission is vested with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. The Public Utilities Act imposes various duties and responsibilities on the commission with respect to the purchase of electricity by electrical corporations and requires the commission to review and adopt a procurement plan and a renewable energy procurement plan for each electrical corporation pursuant to the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. The program requires that a retail seller of electricity, including electrical corporations, purchase a specified minimum percentage of electricity generated by eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, in any given year as a specified percentage of total kilowatthours sold to retail end-use customers each calendar year (renewables portfolio standard) . Under existing law, the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility is responsible for implementing and enforcing a renewables portfolio standard for the utility that recognizes the intent of the Legislature to encourage renewable resources, while taking into consideration the effect of the standard on rates, reliability, and financial resources and the goal of environmental improvement. Existing law requires every electrical corporation to file with the commission a standard tariff for electricity generated by an electric generation facility, as defined, that is owned and operated by a retail customer of the electrical corporation. Existing law requires that the electric generation facility: (1) have an effective capacity of not more than 1.5 megawatts and be located on property owned or under the control of the customer, (2) be interconnected and operate in parallel with the electric transmission and distribution grid, (3) be strategically located and interconnected to the electric transmission system in a manner that optimizes the deliverability of electricity generated at the facility to load centers, and (4) meet the definition of an eligible renewable energy resource under the renewables portfolio standard program. Existing law requires that the tariff provide for payment for every kilowatthour of electricity generated by an electric generation facility at a market price referent established by the commission pursuant to the renewables portfolio standard program. Existing law requires the electrical corporation to make this tariff available to customers that own and operate an electric generation facility within the service territory of the electrical corporation, upon request, on a first-come-first-served basis, until the combined statewide cumulative rated generating capacity of those electric generation facilities equals 500 megawatts, or the electrical corporation meets its proportionate share of the 500 megawatt limit based upon the ratio of its peak demand to total statewide peak demand of all electrical corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to modify or adjust the above-described requirements for any electrical corporation with less than 100,000 service connections, as individual circumstances merit. Existing law provides that the electricity generated by an electric generation facility counts toward the electrical corporation's renewables portfolio standard and provides that the physical generating capacity counts toward meeting the electrical corporation's resource adequacy requirements. This bill would require an electrical corporation to file with the commission a standard tariff for the electricity purchased from an electric generation facility that is located within the service territory of, and developed to sell electricity to, the electrical corporation. The bill would revise the first requirement, discussed above, to instead require that the electric generation facility have an effective capacity of not more than 3 megawatts, subject to the authority of the commission to reduce this megawatt limitation, discussed below, and would delete the requirement that the facility be located on property owned or under the control of the customer. The bill would require that the tariff provide for payment for every kilowatthour of electricity purchased from an electric generation facility for a period of 10, 15, or 20 years, as authorized by the commission. The bill would require that the payment be the market price referent established by the commission pursuant to the renewables portfolio standard program and would require the price to include all current and anticipated environmental compliance costs. The bill would authorize the commission to adjust the payment to reflect the value of the electricity on a time-of-delivery basis and require, with respect to rates and charges, that ratepayers that do not receive service pursuant to the tariff are indifferent to whether other ratepayers receive service pursuant to the tariff. The bill would require an electrical corporation to provide expedited interconnection procedures to an electric generation facility located on a distribution circuit that offsets peak demand on that circuit, if the electrical corporation determines that the electric generation facility will not adversely affect the distribution grid. The bill would require the electrical corporation to make the tariff available to the owner or operator of an electric generation facility within the service territory of the electrical corporation, upon request, on a first-come-first-served basis, until either the corporation meets its proportionate share of a statewide cap of 750 megawatts cumulative rated generation capacity served under the tariffs adopted pursuant to the requirements of the bill or the electrical corporation has reached or exceeds its above-market cost limitation, as specified. The bill would make this requirement contingent on certain conditions relating to the enactment of SB 14, and would provide an alternate requirement if those conditions do not occur. The bill would provide that the electricity purchased from an electric generation facility counts toward meeting the electrical corporation's renewables portfolio standard and that the physical generating capacity of the electric generation facility counts toward meeting the electrical corporation's resource adequacy requirements. The bill would require the commission to establish performance standards for any electric generation facility that has a capacity greater than one megawatt to ensure that those facilities are constructed, operated, and maintained to generate the expected annual net production of electricity and do not impact system reliability, and would authorize the commission to reduce the 3 megawatt capacity limitation if the commission finds that a reduced capacity limitation is necessary to maintain system reliability within that electrical corporation's service territory. The bill would recast the existing authority of the commission to modify or adjust the above-described requirements for any electrical corporation with less than 100,000 service connections, as individual circumstances merit. This bill would provide that an owner or operator of an electric generation facility that received ratepayer-funded incentives and participated in a net metering program prior to January 1, 2010, would be eligible for a tariff or standard contract filed by an electrical corporation pursuant to the above-described provisions, but would require the commission to require reimbursement of funds in some circumstances. An owner or operator that receives service pursuant to a tariff or standard contract adopted by an electrical corporation pursuant to the above-described provisions is not eligible to participate in any net metering program. This bill would require a local publicly owned electric utility that sells electricity at retail to 75,000 or more customers to adopt and implement a tariff for electricity purchased from an electric generation facility meeting certain size, deliverability, and interconnection requirements and to consider certain factors. The bill would require the local publicly owned electric utility to make the tariff available to owners and operators of an electric generation facility within the service territory of the utility, upon request, on a first-come-first-served basis, until the utility meets its proportionate share of a statewide cap of 750 megawatts cumulative rated generation capacity served under the tariffs adopted pursuant to the requirements of this bill. The bill would provide that the electricity purchased from an electric generation facility counts towards meeting the local publicly owned electric utility's renewables portfolio standard annual procurement targets. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or an order or direction of the commission is a crime. Because this bill would require an order or other action of the commission to implement its provisions, and a violation of that order or action would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. By placing additional requirements upon local publicly owned electric utilities, which are entities of local government, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
- Who sponsors SB 32?
- SB 32 is sponsored by Carter and Negrete McLeod.
- What is the current status of SB 32?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 32?
- Track SB 32 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 32
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 32
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →