AB 53 — State employment: salary freeze.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Personnel Administration to establish and adjust salary ranges for each class of position in the state civil service, subject to specified merit limits. Existing law requires the salary range to be based on the principle that like salaries shall be paid for comparable duties and responsibilities. Existing law allows the state to enter into memoranda of understanding relating to employer-employee relations with employee organizations representing certain state employees. This bill would make findings and declarations regarding the budget deficit facing the state. The bill would, until January 1, 2012, prohibit a person employed by the state whose base salary on or after the effective date of the bill is greater than $150,000 per year from receiving a salary increase while employed in the same position or classification, and from receiving payment for overtime work. The bill would exempt from this prohibition a person whose compensation is governed by an operative memorandum of understanding, as described above, a person who has been exempted by executive order of the Governor, as specified, and a person whose salary is set pursuant to the California Constitution.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/14/09 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 14, 2009
- Amended 03/25/09 - Amended Assembly pdf March 25, 2009
- Introduced 12/03/08 - Introduced pdf December 03, 2008
- AB53 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 1).
-
Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee January 3.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Ammiano · Cosponsor
- Brownley · Cosponsor
- Portantino · Primary
- Caballero · Cosponsor
- Salas · Cosponsor
- DeVore · Cosponsor
- Huffman · Cosponsor
- Huff · Cosponsor
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
- Nestande · Cosponsor
- Smyth · Cosponsor
- Swanson · Cosponsor
- Tran · Cosponsor
- Torrico · Cosponsor
- Joaquin Arambula · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 14 co-sponsors · 107 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Portantino
Co-sponsors (14)
- Ammiano
- Brownley
- Caballero
- Salas
- DeVore
- Huffman
- Huff
- Jeffries
- Nestande
- Smyth
- Swanson
- Tran
- Torrico
- Arambula, Joaquin Democratic
Not signed on (107)
107 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 107 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 53 do?
- Existing law requires the Department of Personnel Administration to establish and adjust salary ranges for each class of position in the state civil service, subject to specified merit limits. Existing law requires the salary range to be based on the principle that like salaries shall be paid for comparable duties and responsibilities. Existing law allows the state to enter into memoranda of understanding relating to employer-employee relations with employee organizations representing certain state employees. This bill would make findings and declarations regarding the budget deficit facing the state. The bill would, until January 1, 2012, prohibit a person employed by the state whose base salary on or after the effective date of the bill is greater than $150,000 per year from receiving a salary increase while employed in the same position or classification, and from receiving payment for overtime work. The bill would exempt from this prohibition a person whose compensation is governed by an operative memorandum of understanding, as described above, a person who has been exempted by executive order of the Governor, as specified, and a person whose salary is set pursuant to the California Constitution.
- Who sponsors AB 53?
- AB 53 is sponsored by Ammiano, Brownley, Portantino, Caballero, Salas, DeVore, Huffman, Huff, Jeffries, Nestande, Smyth, Swanson, Tran, Torrico, and Arambula, Joaquin (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 53?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 53?
- Track AB 53 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 53
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 53
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →