AB 2 — Individual health care coverage.
Last action — Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of its provisions a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law prohibits the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care and the Insurance Commissioner from approving a plan contract or health insurance policy without a finding that the application conforms to specified requirements. Existing law prohibits the cancellation or nonrenewal of an enrollment or subscription by a health care service plan except in specified circumstances, including for nonpayment, fraud or deception in the use of services or facilities, or for good cause as agreed upon in the contract. Existing law prohibits the nonrenewal of individual health benefit plans by a health insurer except in specified circumstances, including for nonpayment or for fraud or intentional misrepresentation of material fact. Existing law subjects health care service plans to various fines and administrative penalties for failing to comply with specified provisions of the act and requires that certain fines and administrative penalties be deposited in the Managed Care Administrative Fines and Penalties Fund. Under existing law, the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board manages the California Major Risk Medical Insurance Program (MRMIP) to provide major risk medical insurance coverage to eligible persons who have been rejected for health care coverage by at least one private health plan. Existing law creates the Major Risk Medical Insurance Fund, and continuously appropriates the fund to the board for purposes of the program. This bill would require the director and the commissioner to jointly, by regulation, establish standard information and health history questions to be used by health care service plans and health insurers for their individual health care coverage application forms, as specified, and, on and after January 1, 2011, would require all individual health care service plan and health insurance applications to be reviewed and approved by the director or the commissioner, respectively, before use by a health care service plan or health insurer. This bill would require all plans and insurers to complete medical underwriting prior to issuing a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy, and to meet certain requirements with regard to medical underwriting, including a requirement that the plan or insurer review each application for accuracy and completeness, review specified claims information, make prescription drug database inquiries, and identify and inquire of the applicant about any omissions, ambiguities, or inconsistencies. The bill would prohibit a plan or insurer from canceling or rescinding an individual health care service plan contract or individual health insurance policy unless specified conditions are met with regard to whether an applicant intentionally misrepresented or intentionally omitted material information in the plan or policy application, as specified, and would provide for cancellation or nonrenewal for nonpayment. The bill would also require a plan or insurer to annually report to the department the total number of individual health care service plan contracts or individual health insurance policies issued, canceled, or rescinded pursuant to these provisions during the preceding calendar year. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to provide specified notices to subscribers and enrollees and insureds and policyholders. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2011, establish in the Department of Managed Health Care and the Department of Insurance an independent review process for the review of health care service plans' and health insurers' decisions to cancel or rescind individual health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies, and would impose administrative penalties upon a plan or insurer that engages in any conduct that has the effect of prolonging an independent review process or that fails to implement an independent review process decision. The bill would require that penalties collected from plans be deposited into the Managed Care Administrative Fines and Penalties Fund, and that penalties collected from insurers be deposited into the Major Risk Medical Insurance Fund for purposes of MRMIP, subject to appropriation by the Legislature. The bill would exempt certain types of plans and policies from the bill's requirements and would enact related provisions. Because this bill would impose additional requirements on health care service plans, the willful violation of which would be a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/16/09 - Enrolled Current pdf September 16, 2009
- Amended 08/17/09 - Amended Senate pdf August 17, 2009
- Amended 07/23/09 - Amended Senate pdf July 23, 2009
- Amended 06/02/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 02, 2009
- Amended 04/20/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 20, 2009
- Introduced 12/01/08 - Introduced pdf December 01, 2008
- AB2 View text html
Action History
-
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
-
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 5 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 49. Noes 26. Page 3282.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 24. Noes 13. Page 2292.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(received by desk August 28, 2009 pursuant to JR61(a)(11))
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (August 27).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
-
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 14).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (July 8).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 45. Noes 26. Page 2069.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) (April 28).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee January 1.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- De La Torre · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- De La Torre
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 26 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 28 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 30% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 13 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 13 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 32% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Aanestad | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 7 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 31% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 42% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Not Voting |
| Maldonado | — | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 26 | 0 | 10 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 28 | 0 | 10 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 30% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Not Voting |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2 do?
- Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of its provisions a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law prohibits the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care and the Insurance Commissioner from approving a plan contract or health insurance policy without a finding that the application conforms to specified requirements. Existing law prohibits the cancellation or nonrenewal of an enrollment or subscription by a health care service plan except in specified circumstances, including for nonpayment, fraud or deception in the use of services or facilities, or for good cause as agreed upon in the contract. Existing law prohibits the nonrenewal of individual health benefit plans by a health insurer except in specified circumstances, including for nonpayment or for fraud or intentional misrepresentation of material fact. Existing law subjects health care service plans to various fines and administrative penalties for failing to comply with specified provisions of the act and requires that certain fines and administrative penalties be deposited in the Managed Care Administrative Fines and Penalties Fund. Under existing law, the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board manages the California Major Risk Medical Insurance Program (MRMIP) to provide major risk medical insurance coverage to eligible persons who have been rejected for health care coverage by at least one private health plan. Existing law creates the Major Risk Medical Insurance Fund, and continuously appropriates the fund to the board for purposes of the program. This bill would require the director and the commissioner to jointly, by regulation, establish standard information and health history questions to be used by health care service plans and health insurers for their individual health care coverage application forms, as specified, and, on and after January 1, 2011, would require all individual health care service plan and health insurance applications to be reviewed and approved by the director or the commissioner, respectively, before use by a health care service plan or health insurer. This bill would require all plans and insurers to complete medical underwriting prior to issuing a health care service plan contract or health insurance policy, and to meet certain requirements with regard to medical underwriting, including a requirement that the plan or insurer review each application for accuracy and completeness, review specified claims information, make prescription drug database inquiries, and identify and inquire of the applicant about any omissions, ambiguities, or inconsistencies. The bill would prohibit a plan or insurer from canceling or rescinding an individual health care service plan contract or individual health insurance policy unless specified conditions are met with regard to whether an applicant intentionally misrepresented or intentionally omitted material information in the plan or policy application, as specified, and would provide for cancellation or nonrenewal for nonpayment. The bill would also require a plan or insurer to annually report to the department the total number of individual health care service plan contracts or individual health insurance policies issued, canceled, or rescinded pursuant to these provisions during the preceding calendar year. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to provide specified notices to subscribers and enrollees and insureds and policyholders. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2011, establish in the Department of Managed Health Care and the Department of Insurance an independent review process for the review of health care service plans' and health insurers' decisions to cancel or rescind individual health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies, and would impose administrative penalties upon a plan or insurer that engages in any conduct that has the effect of prolonging an independent review process or that fails to implement an independent review process decision. The bill would require that penalties collected from plans be deposited into the Managed Care Administrative Fines and Penalties Fund, and that penalties collected from insurers be deposited into the Major Risk Medical Insurance Fund for purposes of MRMIP, subject to appropriation by the Legislature. The bill would exempt certain types of plans and policies from the bill's requirements and would enact related provisions. Because this bill would impose additional requirements on health care service plans, the willful violation of which would be a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2?
- AB 2 is sponsored by De La Torre.
- What is the current status of AB 2?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2?
- Track AB 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →