California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 2669 — Public water systems.

Last action — Died on Senate inactive file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the California Safe Drinking Water Act, requires the State Department of Public Health to administer provisions relating to the regulation of drinking water to protect public health, including, but not limited to, conducting research, studies, and demonstration programs relating to the provision of a dependable, safe supply of drinking water, enforcing the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, adoption of enforcement regulations, and conducting studies and investigations to assess the quality of water in domestic water supplies. Existing law establishes the Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, which is continuously appropriated to the department for the provision of grants and revolving fund loans to provide for the design and construction of projects for public water systems that will enable suppliers to meet safe drinking water standards. Under existing law, the funding for grants for planning, engineering studies, environmental documentation, and design of a single project is set at a maximum of $500,000. Existing law requires total funding for planning, engineering studies, project design, and construction costs of a single project, whether in the form of a grant, a loan, or both, to be determined by an assessment of affordability using criteria established by the department. This bill would add environmental documentation to the costs of a single project that the department is required to determine by an assessment of affordability. (2) Existing law requires that various notices be made by a public water system and others regarding compliance with safe drinking water requirements. This bill would require, commencing July 1, 2011, that written public notice given by a public water system pursuant to these provisions be in English, Spanish, and in the language spoken by prescribed numbers of residents of the community served, and that the notice contain prescribed public water system contact information. The bill would also require nonwritten notice to be provided to persons served in the appropriate language or languages in a manner approved by the department in the public water system's emergency notification plan.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Died on Senate inactive file.

  2. To inactive file on motion of Senator Ducheny.

  3. Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 5104.)

  4. Motion to reconsider made by Senator Ducheny.

  5. Read third time, passage refused. (Ayes 15. Noes 8. Page 5103.)

  6. Ordered to third reading.

  7. Withdrawn from committee.

  8. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  9. (Ayes 21. Noes 13. Page 5083.)

  10. Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended.

  11. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  12. Read second time. To third reading.

  13. Read third time, amended. To second reading.

  14. Ordered to third reading.

  15. From committee: With recommendation that the measure be returned to the Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (8/19/2010).

  16. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on EQ. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on EQ.

  17. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.

  18. Read second time. To third reading.

  19. Read third time, amended. To second reading.

  20. Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and to Assembly.

  21. In Senate. Held at Desk.

  22. Ordered returned to Senate.

  23. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 7 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  24. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 4376.)

  25. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  26. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and to Consent Calendar.

  27. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 28).

  28. Re-referred to Com. on EQ.

  29. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  30. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  31. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  32. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 52. Noes 24. Page 5564.)

  33. Read second time. To third reading.

  34. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  35. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 28).

  36. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  37. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (April 13).

  38. Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.

  39. Read first time.

  40. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  41. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • V. Manuel Perez · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • V. Manuel Perez

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 35002
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 38002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Correa — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Huff — Yea
Liu — Yea
Romero — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Failed 15 Yea · 8 Nay · 17 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 158014
Democratic 0002
Republican 0001
Total 158017
% of votes cast 38%20%0%43%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Not Voting
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Not Voting
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Nay
Corbett — Not Voting
Correa — Yea
Huff — Nay
Runner — Nay
Liu — Yea
Lowenthal — Not Voting
Negrete — Not Voting
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Ashburn — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Price — Yea
Simitian — Not Voting
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Not Voting
McLeod — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wyland — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31005
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 34005
% of votes cast 87%0%0%13%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Harman — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Cedillo — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Not Voting
Denham — Not Voting
Florez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 61 Yea · 25 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 572404
Republican 1101
Democratic 3000
Total 612505
% of votes cast 67%27%0%5%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Adams — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Conway — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Nava — Yea
Norby — Not Voting
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Nay
Yamada — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Bill — Nay
Tom — Not Voting
Audra — Not Voting
Evans — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Coto — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Nay
Miller — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Torlakson — Yea
Villines — Nay
Cook — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12005
Democratic 1000
Total 13005
% of votes cast 72%0%0%28%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Conway — Not Voting
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Monning — Yea
Norby — Not Voting
Solorio — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2669 do?
(1) Existing law, the California Safe Drinking Water Act, requires the State Department of Public Health to administer provisions relating to the regulation of drinking water to protect public health, including, but not limited to, conducting research, studies, and demonstration programs relating to the provision of a dependable, safe supply of drinking water, enforcing the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, adoption of enforcement regulations, and conducting studies and investigations to assess the quality of water in domestic water supplies. Existing law establishes the Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, which is continuously appropriated to the department for the provision of grants and revolving fund loans to provide for the design and construction of projects for public water systems that will enable suppliers to meet safe drinking water standards. Under existing law, the funding for grants for planning, engineering studies, environmental documentation, and design of a single project is set at a maximum of $500,000. Existing law requires total funding for planning, engineering studies, project design, and construction costs of a single project, whether in the form of a grant, a loan, or both, to be determined by an assessment of affordability using criteria established by the department. This bill would add environmental documentation to the costs of a single project that the department is required to determine by an assessment of affordability. (2) Existing law requires that various notices be made by a public water system and others regarding compliance with safe drinking water requirements. This bill would require, commencing July 1, 2011, that written public notice given by a public water system pursuant to these provisions be in English, Spanish, and in the language spoken by prescribed numbers of residents of the community served, and that the notice contain prescribed public water system contact information. The bill would also require nonwritten notice to be provided to persons served in the appropriate language or languages in a manner approved by the department in the public water system's emergency notification plan.
Who sponsors AB 2669?
AB 2669 is sponsored by V. Manuel Perez.
What is the current status of AB 2669?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2669?
Track AB 2669 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2669

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2669

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →