Municipal utility district: utility charges: delinquencies.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1035 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1035.
You're tracking SB 1035
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1035 — Municipal utility district: utility charges: delinquencies.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 485, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The existing Municipal Utility District Act authorizes the formation of a municipal utility district. The act authorizes a district to acquire, construct, own, operate, control, or use works for supplying the inhabitants of the district and public agencies with light, water, power, heat, transportation, telephone service, or other means of communication, or means for the collection, treatment, or disposition of garbage, sewage, or refuse matter. The act authorizes a municipal utility district, by resolution or ordinance, to require the owner of record of privately owned real property within the district to pay the fees, tolls, rates, rentals, or other charges for certain utility services rendered to a lessee, tenant, or subtenant, and provides that those charges that have become delinquent, together with interest and penalties, are a lien on the property when a certificate is filed by the district in the office of the county recorder and that the lien has the force, effect, and priority of a judgment lien. The act exempts water and sewer services to residential property and electrical services from this provision. This bill, in addition to the above-described methods for collecting delinquent charges, would establish procedures, until January 1, 2016, for a municipal utility district to collect delinquent fees, tolls, rates, rentals, or other charges, together with interest and penalties thereon, for services rendered to a lessee, tenant, or subtenant, through the tax roll, in the same manner as property taxes. The bill, until January 1, 2016, would authorize a municipal utility district to collect delinquent fees, tolls, rates, rentals, or other charges, together with interest and penalties thereon, for services rendered to a lessee, tenant, or subtenant, by recording in the office of the county recorder of the county in which the affected parcel is located, a certificate declaring the amount of the delinquent charges, together with interest and penalties thereon, which would then constitute a lien against the affected real property of the delinquent property owner in that county and have the force, effect, and priority of a judgment lien. The bill, until January 1, 2016, would delete the above-described exemption for water and sewer services to residential property, thereby exempting only electrical services from these collection provisions. The bill would require any district that places a lien on a property for water or sewer service on or before December 31, 2014, to submit a report containing certain information to the Assembly and Senate Committees on Judiciary and to the Assembly and Senate Committees on Local Government on or before January 1, 2015. By requiring county auditors and recorders to undertake certain actions in response to the exercise of collection measures by a municipal utility district, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require a municipal utility district that exercises these collection measures to reimburse the county for the reasonable expenses incurred by the county. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/29/10 - Chaptered Current pdf September 29, 2010
- Enrolled 08/30/10 - Enrolled pdf August 30, 2010
- Amended 06/10/10 - Amended Assembly pdf June 10, 2010
- Amended 04/29/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 29, 2010
- Amended 04/20/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 20, 2010
- Introduced 02/12/10 - Introduced pdf February 12, 2010
- SB1035 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 485, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 11:45 a.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 11. Page 4909.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6494.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
-
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in Committee on June 16.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
To Coms. on L. GOV. and JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 6. Page 3651.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 1. Page 3497.)
-
Set for hearing May 10.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 3184.)
-
Set for hearing April 13.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 3102.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing April 7.
-
To Coms. on L. GOV. and JUD.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 15.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hancock · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hancock
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 11 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 28% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 28 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 30 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 33% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (90)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 74% | 26% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 5 | 0 | 11 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 15% | 0% | 28% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 9% | 0% | 27% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 20% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1035 do?
- The existing Municipal Utility District Act authorizes the formation of a municipal utility district. The act authorizes a district to acquire, construct, own, operate, control, or use works for supplying the inhabitants of the district and public agencies with light, water, power, heat, transportation, telephone service, or other means of communication, or means for the collection, treatment, or disposition of garbage, sewage, or refuse matter. The act authorizes a municipal utility district, by resolution or ordinance, to require the owner of record of privately owned real property within the district to pay the fees, tolls, rates, rentals, or other charges for certain utility services rendered to a lessee, tenant, or subtenant, and provides that those charges that have become delinquent, together with interest and penalties, are a lien on the property when a certificate is filed by the district in the office of the county recorder and that the lien has the force, effect, and priority of a judgment lien. The act exempts water and sewer services to residential property and electrical services from this provision. This bill, in addition to the above-described methods for collecting delinquent charges, would establish procedures, until January 1, 2016, for a municipal utility district to collect delinquent fees, tolls, rates, rentals, or other charges, together with interest and penalties thereon, for services rendered to a lessee, tenant, or subtenant, through the tax roll, in the same manner as property taxes. The bill, until January 1, 2016, would authorize a municipal utility district to collect delinquent fees, tolls, rates, rentals, or other charges, together with interest and penalties thereon, for services rendered to a lessee, tenant, or subtenant, by recording in the office of the county recorder of the county in which the affected parcel is located, a certificate declaring the amount of the delinquent charges, together with interest and penalties thereon, which would then constitute a lien against the affected real property of the delinquent property owner in that county and have the force, effect, and priority of a judgment lien. The bill, until January 1, 2016, would delete the above-described exemption for water and sewer services to residential property, thereby exempting only electrical services from these collection provisions. The bill would require any district that places a lien on a property for water or sewer service on or before December 31, 2014, to submit a report containing certain information to the Assembly and Senate Committees on Judiciary and to the Assembly and Senate Committees on Local Government on or before January 1, 2015. By requiring county auditors and recorders to undertake certain actions in response to the exercise of collection measures by a municipal utility district, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require a municipal utility district that exercises these collection measures to reimburse the county for the reasonable expenses incurred by the county. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 1035?
- SB 1035 is sponsored by Hancock.
- What is the current status of SB 1035?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1035?
- Track SB 1035 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1035
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1035
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →