Medi-Cal: individuals in county juvenile detention facilities: Alameda County.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 817 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 817.
You're tracking SB 817
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 817 — Medi-Cal: individuals in county juvenile detention facilities: Alameda County.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. Under existing law, children in juvenile facilities are ineligible to receive Medi-Cal benefits. This bill would, subject to the receipt of federal financial participation, provide that Medi-Cal benefits shall be provided to individuals awaiting adjudication in Alameda County Juvenile Hall if an individual is eligible to receive Medi-Cal benefits at the time he or she is admitted to Alameda County Juvenile Hall, or the individual is subsequently determined to be eligible for Medi-Cal benefits, and Alameda County agrees to pay the state's share of Medi-Cal expenditures and the state's administrative costs for the above-described benefits. This bill would provide that the individual would have his or her Medi-Cal benefits continued until the date of the individual's adjudication. This bill would provide that the above-described provisions shall be implemented only if, to the extent that, and on the date that the department receives written confirmation from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that federal financial participation is available and the Director of Health Care Services executes a declaration stating that implementing the above-described provisions will not jeopardize federal funding, as specified. The bill would require the director to cease implementing the bill under prescribed circumstances. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Alameda.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/20/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 20, 2010
- Amended 06/30/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 30, 2009
- Introduced 03/02/09 - Introduced pdf March 02, 2009
- SB817 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6491.)
-
Read third time. Amended. (Ayes 49. Noes 26. Page 6433.) To third reading.
-
From inactive file to third reading file.
-
Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
-
Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Torrico.
-
From Consent Calendar to third reading.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
-
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.)
-
To Com. on E. & R.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 649.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 583.)
-
Set for hearing April 21.
-
To Com. on E., R. & C.A.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after April 4.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hancock · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hancock
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 27 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 57 | 28 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 31% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Audra | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 817 do?
- Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. Under existing law, children in juvenile facilities are ineligible to receive Medi-Cal benefits. This bill would, subject to the receipt of federal financial participation, provide that Medi-Cal benefits shall be provided to individuals awaiting adjudication in Alameda County Juvenile Hall if an individual is eligible to receive Medi-Cal benefits at the time he or she is admitted to Alameda County Juvenile Hall, or the individual is subsequently determined to be eligible for Medi-Cal benefits, and Alameda County agrees to pay the state's share of Medi-Cal expenditures and the state's administrative costs for the above-described benefits. This bill would provide that the individual would have his or her Medi-Cal benefits continued until the date of the individual's adjudication. This bill would provide that the above-described provisions shall be implemented only if, to the extent that, and on the date that the department receives written confirmation from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that federal financial participation is available and the Director of Health Care Services executes a declaration stating that implementing the above-described provisions will not jeopardize federal funding, as specified. The bill would require the director to cease implementing the bill under prescribed circumstances. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Alameda.
- Who sponsors SB 817?
- SB 817 is sponsored by Hancock.
- What is the current status of SB 817?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 817?
- Track SB 817 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 817
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 817
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →