California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 817 — Medi-Cal: individuals in county juvenile detention facilities: Alameda County.

Last action — From Assembly without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. Under existing law, children in juvenile facilities are ineligible to receive Medi-Cal benefits. This bill would, subject to the receipt of federal financial participation, provide that Medi-Cal benefits shall be provided to individuals awaiting adjudication in Alameda County Juvenile Hall if an individual is eligible to receive Medi-Cal benefits at the time he or she is admitted to Alameda County Juvenile Hall, or the individual is subsequently determined to be eligible for Medi-Cal benefits, and Alameda County agrees to pay the state's share of Medi-Cal expenditures and the state's administrative costs for the above-described benefits. This bill would provide that the individual would have his or her Medi-Cal benefits continued until the date of the individual's adjudication. This bill would provide that the above-described provisions shall be implemented only if, to the extent that, and on the date that the department receives written confirmation from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that federal financial participation is available and the Director of Health Care Services executes a declaration stating that implementing the above-described provisions will not jeopardize federal funding, as specified. The bill would require the director to cease implementing the bill under prescribed circumstances. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Alameda.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Assembly without further action.

  2. Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6491.)

  3. Read third time. Amended. (Ayes 49. Noes 26. Page 6433.) To third reading.

  4. From inactive file to third reading file.

  5. Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Charles Calderon.

  6. Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Torrico.

  7. From Consent Calendar to third reading.

  8. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  9. Read second time. Amended. To second reading.

  10. (Heard in committee on June 23.)

  11. From committee: Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.)

  12. To Com. on E. & R.

  13. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  14. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 649.) To Assembly.

  15. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  16. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 583.)

  17. Set for hearing April 21.

  18. To Com. on E., R. & C.A.

  19. From print. May be acted upon on or after April 4.

  20. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Hancock · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Hancock

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 57 Yea · 28 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 542704
Democratic 2001
Republican 1101
Total 572806
% of votes cast 63%31%0%7%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Coto — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Bass — Yea
Block — Yea
Davis — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Charles — Not Voting
Audra — Not Voting
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Norby — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Nay
Villines — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Smyth — Not Voting
Swanson — Yea
Eng — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Galgiani — Not Voting
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36000
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 817 do?
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. Under existing law, children in juvenile facilities are ineligible to receive Medi-Cal benefits. This bill would, subject to the receipt of federal financial participation, provide that Medi-Cal benefits shall be provided to individuals awaiting adjudication in Alameda County Juvenile Hall if an individual is eligible to receive Medi-Cal benefits at the time he or she is admitted to Alameda County Juvenile Hall, or the individual is subsequently determined to be eligible for Medi-Cal benefits, and Alameda County agrees to pay the state's share of Medi-Cal expenditures and the state's administrative costs for the above-described benefits. This bill would provide that the individual would have his or her Medi-Cal benefits continued until the date of the individual's adjudication. This bill would provide that the above-described provisions shall be implemented only if, to the extent that, and on the date that the department receives written confirmation from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that federal financial participation is available and the Director of Health Care Services executes a declaration stating that implementing the above-described provisions will not jeopardize federal funding, as specified. The bill would require the director to cease implementing the bill under prescribed circumstances. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Alameda.
Who sponsors SB 817?
SB 817 is sponsored by Hancock.
What is the current status of SB 817?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 817?
Track SB 817 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 817

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 817

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →