Facilitated Mortgage Workout Program.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1639 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1639.
You're tracking AB 1639
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1639 — Facilitated Mortgage Workout Program.
Last action — Died on inactive file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires that, upon a breach of the obligation of a mortgage or transfer of an interest in property, the trustee, mortgagee, or beneficiary record a notice of default in the office of the county recorder where the mortgaged or trust property is situated and mail the notice of default to the mortgagor or trustor, among other acts required prior to exercising a power of sale in a nonjudicial foreclosure proceeding. This bill would establish, contingent upon receipt of federal funding for all costs, and only until January 1, 2014, the Facilitated Mortgage Workout (FMW) Program. The program would be a process whereby borrowers and lenders would engage in conciliation sessions for purposes of developing a loan modification plan. These provisions would apply, except as specified, if the loan originated prior to January 1, 2009, the loan is the 1st mortgage or deed of trust secured by the property, the property is occupied by the borrower as the borrower's principal residence, and the unpaid principal balance is not more than $729,750. The program would require that specified information regarding the FMW Program be included with the notice of default sent to a borrower, as defined, on a loan secured by residential real property of one- to 4-family dwelling units that is the primary residence of the borrower, as specified. The bill would require that this additional notice be recorded in the office of the county recorder. By expanding the duties of county recorders, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would provide for an administrator of the program who would be appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. The program would require a borrower who elects to participate in the program to complete a specified form and return the form to the administrator of the program not later than 30 calendar days after receiving the notice of default. The program would require the borrower to submit other information to the administrator within 15 days of requesting to participate in the program, including tax returns, income verification, a specified deposit of funds, and a letter describing the borrower's financial hardship, as specified. The program would require a borrower who elects to participate in the program to deposit with the administrator 50% of the current mortgage payment each month during participation in the FMW Program. The bill would also prohibit a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent from reporting negative credit information to a credit reporting agency about a borrower who has completed the FMW Program and accepted a mortgage loan modification. The bill would impose various administrative fees, and a specified minimum deposit, payable by the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, or by the borrower, as specified, who participates in the FMW Program. The bill would also provide that the timelines set forth in the provision governing the exercise of the power of sale, as specified, would be suspended until the completion of the program, as specified. The bill would require the administrator of the program, among other duties, to implement rules and standards for selecting qualified neutral conciliation officers and to develop standards for forms and reports required to implement the program. The bill would also require the administrator, upon receipt of a borrower's form whereby he or she elects to participate in the program, to nominate an individual to serve as a neutral conciliation officer from a list of qualified neutral conciliation officers in the county in which the property is located. The bill would establish the compensation for a neutral conciliation officer who provides his or her services to the program and require a neutral conciliation officer to use reasonable efforts to ensure that each FMW Program is completed within 60 calendar days of the neutral conciliation officer's nomination. The bill would require the neutral conciliation officer to prepare a final report, as specified. The bill would also require, only until January 1, 2015, the administrator to report quarterly to the Legislature regarding the FMW Program, as specified. The bill would also require each mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent participating in the program to post specified data about its loans on its Internet Web site. These provisions would become operative only upon the issuance of a notice from the administrator to the Governor and specified other legislative leaders, and the posting of the notice on an Internet Web site, declaring that the administrator has the capacity to make the program available to any borrower in every county who desires to participate. The bill would also make related and technical changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/28/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 28, 2010
- Amended 04/12/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 12, 2010
- Amended 03/15/10 - Amended Assembly pdf March 15, 2010
- Introduced 01/11/10 - Introduced pdf January 11, 2010
- AB1639 View text html
Action History
-
Died on inactive file.
-
To inactive file on motion of Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
-
Reconsideration granted. (Ayes 42. Noes 24. Page 5588.)
-
Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Charles Calderon.
-
Read third time, passage refused. (Ayes 38. Noes 31. Page 5587.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 22).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 5.) (April 19).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 4712.)
-
Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 4712.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F. by unanimous consent, and then be re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and B. & F. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 8).
-
Re-referred to Com. on RULES by unanimous consent.
-
Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on BUDGET. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 11.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Bass · Cosponsor
- DeSaulnier · Cosponsor
- Lieu · Cosponsor
- Monning · Cosponsor
- Nava · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Nava
Co-sponsors (4)
- Bass
- DeSaulnier
- Lieu
- Monning
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 43 | 31 | 0 | 11 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 45 | 32 | 0 | 14 |
| % of votes cast | 49% | 35% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Nay |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| V. | — | Not Voting |
| Manuel | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Audra | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 47 | 23 | 0 | 15 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 50 | 24 | 0 | 17 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 26% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Not Voting |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Bonnie | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Audra | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Torrico | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Not Voting |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 42% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1639 do?
- Existing law requires that, upon a breach of the obligation of a mortgage or transfer of an interest in property, the trustee, mortgagee, or beneficiary record a notice of default in the office of the county recorder where the mortgaged or trust property is situated and mail the notice of default to the mortgagor or trustor, among other acts required prior to exercising a power of sale in a nonjudicial foreclosure proceeding. This bill would establish, contingent upon receipt of federal funding for all costs, and only until January 1, 2014, the Facilitated Mortgage Workout (FMW) Program. The program would be a process whereby borrowers and lenders would engage in conciliation sessions for purposes of developing a loan modification plan. These provisions would apply, except as specified, if the loan originated prior to January 1, 2009, the loan is the 1st mortgage or deed of trust secured by the property, the property is occupied by the borrower as the borrower's principal residence, and the unpaid principal balance is not more than $729,750. The program would require that specified information regarding the FMW Program be included with the notice of default sent to a borrower, as defined, on a loan secured by residential real property of one- to 4-family dwelling units that is the primary residence of the borrower, as specified. The bill would require that this additional notice be recorded in the office of the county recorder. By expanding the duties of county recorders, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would provide for an administrator of the program who would be appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. The program would require a borrower who elects to participate in the program to complete a specified form and return the form to the administrator of the program not later than 30 calendar days after receiving the notice of default. The program would require the borrower to submit other information to the administrator within 15 days of requesting to participate in the program, including tax returns, income verification, a specified deposit of funds, and a letter describing the borrower's financial hardship, as specified. The program would require a borrower who elects to participate in the program to deposit with the administrator 50% of the current mortgage payment each month during participation in the FMW Program. The bill would also prohibit a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent from reporting negative credit information to a credit reporting agency about a borrower who has completed the FMW Program and accepted a mortgage loan modification. The bill would impose various administrative fees, and a specified minimum deposit, payable by the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, or by the borrower, as specified, who participates in the FMW Program. The bill would also provide that the timelines set forth in the provision governing the exercise of the power of sale, as specified, would be suspended until the completion of the program, as specified. The bill would require the administrator of the program, among other duties, to implement rules and standards for selecting qualified neutral conciliation officers and to develop standards for forms and reports required to implement the program. The bill would also require the administrator, upon receipt of a borrower's form whereby he or she elects to participate in the program, to nominate an individual to serve as a neutral conciliation officer from a list of qualified neutral conciliation officers in the county in which the property is located. The bill would establish the compensation for a neutral conciliation officer who provides his or her services to the program and require a neutral conciliation officer to use reasonable efforts to ensure that each FMW Program is completed within 60 calendar days of the neutral conciliation officer's nomination. The bill would require the neutral conciliation officer to prepare a final report, as specified. The bill would also require, only until January 1, 2015, the administrator to report quarterly to the Legislature regarding the FMW Program, as specified. The bill would also require each mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent participating in the program to post specified data about its loans on its Internet Web site. These provisions would become operative only upon the issuance of a notice from the administrator to the Governor and specified other legislative leaders, and the posting of the notice on an Internet Web site, declaring that the administrator has the capacity to make the program available to any borrower in every county who desires to participate. The bill would also make related and technical changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1639?
- AB 1639 is sponsored by Bass, DeSaulnier, Lieu, Monning, and Nava.
- What is the current status of AB 1639?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1639?
- Track AB 1639 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1639
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1639
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →