AB 2289 — Smog check program: testing: penalties.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 258, Statutes of 2010.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2010. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Mixed recorded votes
8 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (smog check) program, developed, implemented, and administered by the Department of Consumer Affairs. The smog check program provides for the inspection of a motor vehicle, among other circumstances, upon its initial registration, upon transfer of ownership, and for vehicles registered in certain areas of the state, biennially upon renewal of registration. Existing law requires the smog tests to include, at minimum, loaded mode dynamometer testing in enhanced areas, and 2-speed testing in all other program areas, and a visual or functional check of emission control devices specified by the department. This bill would require the department to implement testing using onboard diagnostic systems, in lieu of loaded mode dynamometer or 2-speed idle testing, only on model year 2000 and newer vehicles, beginning no earlier than January 1, 2013, and otherwise authorize the department, in consultation with the State Air Resources Board, to determine the appropriate test procedures, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to adopt, by regulation, a process by which vehicles that present prohibitive or unusual inspection circumstances are inspected by referees, as provided. A referee would be authorized to charge a fee sufficient to cover the costs of providing certain referee services. The bill would require the department to issue inspection-based performance standards that stations would be required to meet to be eligible to issue certificates of compliance or noncompliance for certain vehicles. The bill would make other changes to the department's authority with respect to the smog check program, including requirements relating to testing equipment and motor vehicle emission data. (2) Existing law authorizes the Department of Consumer Affairs to issue a citation to a smog check station or technician that may specify certain civil penalties. This bill would repeal this provision and related provisions specifying the circumstances in which such a citation may be issued and certain minimum and maximum amounts for civil penalties. It would, instead, authorize the department to issue a citation to a licensee, contractor, or fleet owner for a violation of smog check requirements. The citation could contain an order of abatement or the assessment of an administrative fine between $100 and $5,000, or both, meeting specified requirements. The bill would make other changes to smog check penalty provisions, including authorizing civil penalties up to $5,000 for a violation of smog check requirements.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/24/10 - Chaptered Current pdf September 24, 2010
- Enrolled 09/03/10 - Enrolled pdf September 03, 2010
- Amended 08/20/10 - Amended Senate pdf August 20, 2010
- Amended 08/02/10 - Amended Senate pdf August 02, 2010
- Amended 07/15/10 - Amended Senate pdf July 15, 2010
- Amended 06/23/10 - Amended Senate pdf June 23, 2010
- Amended 05/28/10 - Amended Assembly pdf May 28, 2010
- Amended 04/21/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 21, 2010
- Introduced 02/18/10 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2010
- AB2289 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 258, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 49. Noes 25. Page 6750.)
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6707.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 27 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 22. Noes 11. Page 4874.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read third time, amended. To second reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (August 9).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (July 1).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on T. & H. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 28).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and T. & H.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 27. Page 5521.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (April 19).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Eng · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Eng
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 26 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 28 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 31% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (90)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Tran | — | Not Voting |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 28% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 9% | 0% | 36% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 20% | 0% | 30% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 27 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 57 | 28 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 31% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| A. | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Audra | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 25% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2289 do?
- (1) Existing law establishes a motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (smog check) program, developed, implemented, and administered by the Department of Consumer Affairs. The smog check program provides for the inspection of a motor vehicle, among other circumstances, upon its initial registration, upon transfer of ownership, and for vehicles registered in certain areas of the state, biennially upon renewal of registration. Existing law requires the smog tests to include, at minimum, loaded mode dynamometer testing in enhanced areas, and 2-speed testing in all other program areas, and a visual or functional check of emission control devices specified by the department. This bill would require the department to implement testing using onboard diagnostic systems, in lieu of loaded mode dynamometer or 2-speed idle testing, only on model year 2000 and newer vehicles, beginning no earlier than January 1, 2013, and otherwise authorize the department, in consultation with the State Air Resources Board, to determine the appropriate test procedures, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to adopt, by regulation, a process by which vehicles that present prohibitive or unusual inspection circumstances are inspected by referees, as provided. A referee would be authorized to charge a fee sufficient to cover the costs of providing certain referee services. The bill would require the department to issue inspection-based performance standards that stations would be required to meet to be eligible to issue certificates of compliance or noncompliance for certain vehicles. The bill would make other changes to the department's authority with respect to the smog check program, including requirements relating to testing equipment and motor vehicle emission data. (2) Existing law authorizes the Department of Consumer Affairs to issue a citation to a smog check station or technician that may specify certain civil penalties. This bill would repeal this provision and related provisions specifying the circumstances in which such a citation may be issued and certain minimum and maximum amounts for civil penalties. It would, instead, authorize the department to issue a citation to a licensee, contractor, or fleet owner for a violation of smog check requirements. The citation could contain an order of abatement or the assessment of an administrative fine between $100 and $5,000, or both, meeting specified requirements. The bill would make other changes to smog check penalty provisions, including authorizing civil penalties up to $5,000 for a violation of smog check requirements.
- Who sponsors AB 2289?
- AB 2289 is sponsored by Eng.
- What is the current status of AB 2289?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2010. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2289?
- Track AB 2289 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2289
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2289
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →