California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 142 — In-home supportive services: provider timesheets.

Last action — From Assembly without further action.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law permits services to be provided under the IHSS program either through the employment of individual providers, a contract between the county and an entity for the provision of services, the creation by the county of a public authority, or a contract between the county and a nonprofit consortium. Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services is required, in consultation and coordination with county welfare departments, to establish and implement statewide hourly task guidelines and instructions to provide counties with a standard tool for consistently and accurately assessing service needs and authorizing service hours to meet those needs. This bill would require the department, on or before December 31, 2011, to develop procedures to ensure that an IHSS provider receives a list specifying the approved duties to be performed for each recipient under the provider's care and a complete list of supportive service tasks available under the IHSS program.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Assembly without further action.

  2. From committee without further action.

  3. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. (Heard in committee on June 30.)

  5. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.)

  6. To Com. on HUM. S.

  7. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  8. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 32. Noes 1. Page 1094.) To Assembly.

  9. Read second time. To third reading.

  10. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  11. Set for hearing May 26.

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  14. Set for hearing May 18.

  15. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  16. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 700.)

  17. Set for hearing April 28.

  18. Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.

  19. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  20. To Com. on RLS.

  21. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 14.

  22. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Maldonado · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Maldonado

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Senate 3rd Reading SB142 Maldonado

Passed 32 Yea · 1 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 29107
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 32107
% of votes cast 80%3%0%18%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Cogdill — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Harman — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Runner — Yea
Ducheny — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Not Voting
Negrete — Not Voting
Dutton — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Nay
Benoit — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Romero — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Not Voting
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

healthcare labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 142 do?
Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law permits services to be provided under the IHSS program either through the employment of individual providers, a contract between the county and an entity for the provision of services, the creation by the county of a public authority, or a contract between the county and a nonprofit consortium. Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services is required, in consultation and coordination with county welfare departments, to establish and implement statewide hourly task guidelines and instructions to provide counties with a standard tool for consistently and accurately assessing service needs and authorizing service hours to meet those needs. This bill would require the department, on or before December 31, 2011, to develop procedures to ensure that an IHSS provider receives a list specifying the approved duties to be performed for each recipient under the provider's care and a complete list of supportive service tasks available under the IHSS program.
Who sponsors SB 142?
SB 142 is sponsored by Maldonado.
What is the current status of SB 142?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 142?
Track SB 142 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 142

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 142

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →