SB 541 — Elections: ballot cards and voting systems.
Last action — Stricken from Senate file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the Secretary of State to adopt regulations governing the manufacture, distribution, and inventory control of punchcards, and requiring the inspection of facilities that manufacture and store punchcards. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to approve a punchcard manufacturer prior to the manufacturer's providing of punchcards for use in California elections. This bill would instead require the Secretary of State to adopt regulations governing the manufacture, finishing, quality standards, and inventory control of ballot cards, and requiring the biennial inspection of facilities that manufacture, finish, and store ballot cards. The bill would require that, no later than 5 days prior to inspection, the ballot card manufacturer or finisher disclose to the Secretary of State known flaws or defects in its current or past manufacturing or finishing process of ballot cards or manufactured or finished ballot cards that could adversely affect the casting or tallying of votes. The bill would require a manufacturer or finisher of ballot cards to notify the Secretary of State and affected local elections officials of defects that would adversely affect the casting or tallying of ballot cards that it discovers after approval by the Secretary of State within 2 business days of their discovery. Existing law provides for a revolving fund that is continuously appropriated for the purpose of purchasing ballot paper and punchcards. This bill would repeal these provisions. Existing law provides that a person or corporation owning or being interested in a voting system or part of a voting system may apply to the Secretary of State to examine it and report on its accuracy and efficiency to fulfill its purpose. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to issue a report regarding whether, in his or her opinion, the voting system or part of a voting system can be safely used. This bill would instead require that a vendor of a voting system or part of a voting system include in its application to the Secretary of State notification of a known defect, fault, or failure of the hardware, software, or firmware of the voting system or a part of the voting system. The bill would also require the vendor to notify the Secretary of State of such a defect, fault, or failure discovered either after the vendor submitted his or her application but prior to the issuance of the Secretary of State's report or after the voting system or the part of a voting system is approved by the Secretary of State. The bill would also require the Secretary of State to notify and issue a report to the United States Election Assistance Commission regarding the defects, faults, or failures made known by the vendor at the initiation of, during, or after the approval process. Existing law permits the Secretary of State to seek damages for an unauthorized change in hardware, software, or firmware in a certified or conditionally certified voting system. This bill would also permit the Secretary of State to seek civil penalties for a known but undisclosed defect, fault, or failure in an approved or conditionally approved voting system and for a failure to comply with notification requirements concerning the defect, fault, or failure and to seek a refund of payment made for the voting system or part of the system.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/15/09 - Enrolled Current pdf September 15, 2009
- Amended 09/03/09 - Amended Assembly pdf September 03, 2009
- Amended 08/24/09 - Amended Assembly pdf August 24, 2009
- Amended 07/14/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 14, 2009
- Amended 06/30/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 30, 2009
- Amended 06/11/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 11, 2009
- Amended 04/15/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 15, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- SB541 View text html
Action History
-
Stricken from Senate file.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 26. Noes 14. Page 2387.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 50. Noes 29. Page 3229.) To Senate.
-
Read third time. Amended. To third reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
-
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on July 7.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
-
To Com. on E. & R.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 15. Page 891.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 4.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 382.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing March 31.
-
To Com. on E., R. & C.A.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Pavley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Pavley
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 34% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Maldonado | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 32 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 35% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 38% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Saldana | — | Not Voting |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 14 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 15 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 38% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Maldonado | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 541 do?
- Existing law requires the Secretary of State to adopt regulations governing the manufacture, distribution, and inventory control of punchcards, and requiring the inspection of facilities that manufacture and store punchcards. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to approve a punchcard manufacturer prior to the manufacturer's providing of punchcards for use in California elections. This bill would instead require the Secretary of State to adopt regulations governing the manufacture, finishing, quality standards, and inventory control of ballot cards, and requiring the biennial inspection of facilities that manufacture, finish, and store ballot cards. The bill would require that, no later than 5 days prior to inspection, the ballot card manufacturer or finisher disclose to the Secretary of State known flaws or defects in its current or past manufacturing or finishing process of ballot cards or manufactured or finished ballot cards that could adversely affect the casting or tallying of votes. The bill would require a manufacturer or finisher of ballot cards to notify the Secretary of State and affected local elections officials of defects that would adversely affect the casting or tallying of ballot cards that it discovers after approval by the Secretary of State within 2 business days of their discovery. Existing law provides for a revolving fund that is continuously appropriated for the purpose of purchasing ballot paper and punchcards. This bill would repeal these provisions. Existing law provides that a person or corporation owning or being interested in a voting system or part of a voting system may apply to the Secretary of State to examine it and report on its accuracy and efficiency to fulfill its purpose. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to issue a report regarding whether, in his or her opinion, the voting system or part of a voting system can be safely used. This bill would instead require that a vendor of a voting system or part of a voting system include in its application to the Secretary of State notification of a known defect, fault, or failure of the hardware, software, or firmware of the voting system or a part of the voting system. The bill would also require the vendor to notify the Secretary of State of such a defect, fault, or failure discovered either after the vendor submitted his or her application but prior to the issuance of the Secretary of State's report or after the voting system or the part of a voting system is approved by the Secretary of State. The bill would also require the Secretary of State to notify and issue a report to the United States Election Assistance Commission regarding the defects, faults, or failures made known by the vendor at the initiation of, during, or after the approval process. Existing law permits the Secretary of State to seek damages for an unauthorized change in hardware, software, or firmware in a certified or conditionally certified voting system. This bill would also permit the Secretary of State to seek civil penalties for a known but undisclosed defect, fault, or failure in an approved or conditionally approved voting system and for a failure to comply with notification requirements concerning the defect, fault, or failure and to seek a refund of payment made for the voting system or part of the system.
- Who sponsors SB 541?
- SB 541 is sponsored by Pavley.
- What is the current status of SB 541?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 541?
- Track SB 541 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 541
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 541
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →