California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1386 — State highways.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 291, Statutes of 2009.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law authorizes a city or county in which a planned transportation facility was to be located on State Highway Route 238 in Alameda County to develop and file with the California Transportation Commission a local alternative transportation improvement program that addresses transportation problems and opportunities, and provides for the use of revenues from the sales of excess properties acquired for the planned state facility in order to fund the local alternative transportation improvement program, but limits the use of revenues from excess property sales to state highway purposes. Existing law provides that the commission may not approve a local alternative transportation improvement program under these provisions after July 1, 2010. Similar provisions apply to State Highway Route 84 in the Cities of Fremont and Union City, except that the use of revenues from excess property sales in that corridor are limited to state highway purposes or projects in the local voter-approved transportation sales tax measure. This bill would modify the restriction limiting use of revenues from excess property sales to state highway purposes applicable to State Highway Route 238 by authorizing those revenues to be used for any highway purpose. This bill would require revenues from excess property sales for State Highway Route 238 and State Highway Route 84 to be deposited into separate accounts in the Special Deposit Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, to be available for expenditure by local agencies for purposes of an approved local alternative transportation improvement program for the applicable corridor route. The bill would thereby make an appropriation. This bill would also authorize local agencies to advance projects in the local alternative transportation improvement program with local funds, to be repaid when revenues from excess property sales become available, as specified. This bill would require the California Transportation Commission to adopt guidelines in that regard. Existing law requires a local alternative transportation improvement program for State Highway Route 238 to provide, among other things, relocation assistance and replacement housing units for persons displaced as a result of the sale of excess properties to fund the local alternative transportation improvement program. This bill would make these provisions inoperative, and would enact new provisions to become operative, on the date on which the superior court issues the final approval order for the settlement agreement related to the disposition of excess properties acquired for the State Route 238 Hayward Bypass Project signed by the department, the City of Hayward, and representatives for members of the class of residents, or on January 1, 2010, whichever comes later. The new provisions would, among other things, require monetary assistance to eligible tenant households and provision of 237 additional new low-income housing units. The new provisions would also require the department to offer the direct sale of eligible excess single-family residences on an as-is, fair market value basis, to current tenants meeting specified requirements and would enact other related provisions in that regard. The bill would authorize proceeds from the sale of excess properties to be used for the cost of selling the properties and various administrative, commercial, or legal costs, including program administration costs to develop and administer the home purchase program and an administrative hearing process for tenants. Existing law provides for state highways to be constructed, as determined by the California Transportation Commission, on routes authorized by law. Existing law provides for relinquishment by the commission of state highways to local agencies under certain conditions. This bill would authorize the commission to relinquish portions of State Highway Routes 92, 185, and 238 in the City of Hayward to that city subject to various conditions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 291, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 5 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 50. Noes 28. Page 3275.)

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 14. Page 2294.)

  7. Read second time. To third reading.

  8. Read third time, amended. To second reading.

  9. Read second time. To third reading.

  10. (received by desk August 28, 2009 pursuant to JR61(a)(11))

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 5.) (August 27).

  12. In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.

  13. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  14. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  15. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (July 7).

  16. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  17. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  18. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.

  19. Referred to Com. on T. & H.

  20. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  21. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 55. Noes 21. Page 1854.)

  22. Read second time. To third reading.

  23. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 28).

  24. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  25. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  26. Read second time and amended.

  27. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (April 20).

  28. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

  29. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.

  30. Referred to Com. on TRANS.

  31. Read first time.

  32. From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

  33. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Corbett · Cosponsor
  • Hayashi · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Hayashi

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Corbett

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 59 Yea · 31 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 552902
Republican 1200
Democratic 3000
Total 593102
% of votes cast 64%34%0%2%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
DeVore — Nay
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Duvall — Not Voting
Jeffries — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Nay
Villines — Nay
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Coto — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Block — Yea
Davis — Yea
Huber — Yea
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Not Voting
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Evans — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 25 Yea · 15 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 231500
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 251501
% of votes cast 61%37%0%2%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Negrete — Nay
Runner — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Dutton — Nay
McLeod — Nay
Aanestad — Nay
Ashburn — Nay
Harman — Nay
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cogdill — Nay
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 8 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8500
Total 8500
% of votes cast 62%38%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Runner — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Leno — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Nay
Denham — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Runner — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Leno — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Cox — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 6 Yea · 3 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6302
Total 6302
% of votes cast 55%27%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Lowenthal — Yea
Harman — Nay
Huff — Nay
Ashburn — Not Voting
Oropeza — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Hollingsworth — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 64 Yea · 23 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 582105
Republican 1200
Democratic 5000
Total 642305
% of votes cast 70%25%0%5%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Carter — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Gaines — Nay
Audra — Nay
Bill — Not Voting
Berryhill — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Davis — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Tom — Nay
Berryhill — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Price — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Knight — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Logue — Nay
Miller — Not Voting
Nestande — Nay
Silva — Nay
Villines — Nay
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Not Voting
Emmerson — Yea
Feuer — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Fong, Mike Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 16 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15401
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 16501
% of votes cast 73%23%0%5%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Duvall — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Miller — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 14 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13200
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 14300
% of votes cast 82%18%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Miller — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Conway — Yea
Eng — Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1386 do?
Existing law authorizes a city or county in which a planned transportation facility was to be located on State Highway Route 238 in Alameda County to develop and file with the California Transportation Commission a local alternative transportation improvement program that addresses transportation problems and opportunities, and provides for the use of revenues from the sales of excess properties acquired for the planned state facility in order to fund the local alternative transportation improvement program, but limits the use of revenues from excess property sales to state highway purposes. Existing law provides that the commission may not approve a local alternative transportation improvement program under these provisions after July 1, 2010. Similar provisions apply to State Highway Route 84 in the Cities of Fremont and Union City, except that the use of revenues from excess property sales in that corridor are limited to state highway purposes or projects in the local voter-approved transportation sales tax measure. This bill would modify the restriction limiting use of revenues from excess property sales to state highway purposes applicable to State Highway Route 238 by authorizing those revenues to be used for any highway purpose. This bill would require revenues from excess property sales for State Highway Route 238 and State Highway Route 84 to be deposited into separate accounts in the Special Deposit Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, to be available for expenditure by local agencies for purposes of an approved local alternative transportation improvement program for the applicable corridor route. The bill would thereby make an appropriation. This bill would also authorize local agencies to advance projects in the local alternative transportation improvement program with local funds, to be repaid when revenues from excess property sales become available, as specified. This bill would require the California Transportation Commission to adopt guidelines in that regard. Existing law requires a local alternative transportation improvement program for State Highway Route 238 to provide, among other things, relocation assistance and replacement housing units for persons displaced as a result of the sale of excess properties to fund the local alternative transportation improvement program. This bill would make these provisions inoperative, and would enact new provisions to become operative, on the date on which the superior court issues the final approval order for the settlement agreement related to the disposition of excess properties acquired for the State Route 238 Hayward Bypass Project signed by the department, the City of Hayward, and representatives for members of the class of residents, or on January 1, 2010, whichever comes later. The new provisions would, among other things, require monetary assistance to eligible tenant households and provision of 237 additional new low-income housing units. The new provisions would also require the department to offer the direct sale of eligible excess single-family residences on an as-is, fair market value basis, to current tenants meeting specified requirements and would enact other related provisions in that regard. The bill would authorize proceeds from the sale of excess properties to be used for the cost of selling the properties and various administrative, commercial, or legal costs, including program administration costs to develop and administer the home purchase program and an administrative hearing process for tenants. Existing law provides for state highways to be constructed, as determined by the California Transportation Commission, on routes authorized by law. Existing law provides for relinquishment by the commission of state highways to local agencies under certain conditions. This bill would authorize the commission to relinquish portions of State Highway Routes 92, 185, and 238 in the City of Hayward to that city subject to various conditions.
Who sponsors AB 1386?
AB 1386 is sponsored by Corbett and Hayashi.
What is the current status of AB 1386?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1386?
Track AB 1386 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1386

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1386

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →