AB 1386 — State highways.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 291, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a city or county in which a planned transportation facility was to be located on State Highway Route 238 in Alameda County to develop and file with the California Transportation Commission a local alternative transportation improvement program that addresses transportation problems and opportunities, and provides for the use of revenues from the sales of excess properties acquired for the planned state facility in order to fund the local alternative transportation improvement program, but limits the use of revenues from excess property sales to state highway purposes. Existing law provides that the commission may not approve a local alternative transportation improvement program under these provisions after July 1, 2010. Similar provisions apply to State Highway Route 84 in the Cities of Fremont and Union City, except that the use of revenues from excess property sales in that corridor are limited to state highway purposes or projects in the local voter-approved transportation sales tax measure. This bill would modify the restriction limiting use of revenues from excess property sales to state highway purposes applicable to State Highway Route 238 by authorizing those revenues to be used for any highway purpose. This bill would require revenues from excess property sales for State Highway Route 238 and State Highway Route 84 to be deposited into separate accounts in the Special Deposit Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, to be available for expenditure by local agencies for purposes of an approved local alternative transportation improvement program for the applicable corridor route. The bill would thereby make an appropriation. This bill would also authorize local agencies to advance projects in the local alternative transportation improvement program with local funds, to be repaid when revenues from excess property sales become available, as specified. This bill would require the California Transportation Commission to adopt guidelines in that regard. Existing law requires a local alternative transportation improvement program for State Highway Route 238 to provide, among other things, relocation assistance and replacement housing units for persons displaced as a result of the sale of excess properties to fund the local alternative transportation improvement program. This bill would make these provisions inoperative, and would enact new provisions to become operative, on the date on which the superior court issues the final approval order for the settlement agreement related to the disposition of excess properties acquired for the State Route 238 Hayward Bypass Project signed by the department, the City of Hayward, and representatives for members of the class of residents, or on January 1, 2010, whichever comes later. The new provisions would, among other things, require monetary assistance to eligible tenant households and provision of 237 additional new low-income housing units. The new provisions would also require the department to offer the direct sale of eligible excess single-family residences on an as-is, fair market value basis, to current tenants meeting specified requirements and would enact other related provisions in that regard. The bill would authorize proceeds from the sale of excess properties to be used for the cost of selling the properties and various administrative, commercial, or legal costs, including program administration costs to develop and administer the home purchase program and an administrative hearing process for tenants. Existing law provides for state highways to be constructed, as determined by the California Transportation Commission, on routes authorized by law. Existing law provides for relinquishment by the commission of state highways to local agencies under certain conditions. This bill would authorize the commission to relinquish portions of State Highway Routes 92, 185, and 238 in the City of Hayward to that city subject to various conditions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/17/09 - Enrolled pdf September 17, 2009
- Amended 09/02/09 - Amended Senate pdf September 02, 2009
- Amended 06/23/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 23, 2009
- Amended 04/22/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 22, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- AB1386 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 291, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 5 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 50. Noes 28. Page 3275.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 14. Page 2294.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read third time, amended. To second reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(received by desk August 28, 2009 pursuant to JR61(a)(11))
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 5.) (August 27).
-
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (July 7).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 55. Noes 21. Page 1854.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (April 20).
-
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Corbett · Cosponsor
- Hayashi · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hayashi
Co-sponsors (1)
- Corbett
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 29 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 31 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 34% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 25 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 37% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Nay |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 27% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 58 | 21 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 64 | 23 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 25% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Not Voting |
| Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 23% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 18% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1386 do?
- Existing law authorizes a city or county in which a planned transportation facility was to be located on State Highway Route 238 in Alameda County to develop and file with the California Transportation Commission a local alternative transportation improvement program that addresses transportation problems and opportunities, and provides for the use of revenues from the sales of excess properties acquired for the planned state facility in order to fund the local alternative transportation improvement program, but limits the use of revenues from excess property sales to state highway purposes. Existing law provides that the commission may not approve a local alternative transportation improvement program under these provisions after July 1, 2010. Similar provisions apply to State Highway Route 84 in the Cities of Fremont and Union City, except that the use of revenues from excess property sales in that corridor are limited to state highway purposes or projects in the local voter-approved transportation sales tax measure. This bill would modify the restriction limiting use of revenues from excess property sales to state highway purposes applicable to State Highway Route 238 by authorizing those revenues to be used for any highway purpose. This bill would require revenues from excess property sales for State Highway Route 238 and State Highway Route 84 to be deposited into separate accounts in the Special Deposit Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, to be available for expenditure by local agencies for purposes of an approved local alternative transportation improvement program for the applicable corridor route. The bill would thereby make an appropriation. This bill would also authorize local agencies to advance projects in the local alternative transportation improvement program with local funds, to be repaid when revenues from excess property sales become available, as specified. This bill would require the California Transportation Commission to adopt guidelines in that regard. Existing law requires a local alternative transportation improvement program for State Highway Route 238 to provide, among other things, relocation assistance and replacement housing units for persons displaced as a result of the sale of excess properties to fund the local alternative transportation improvement program. This bill would make these provisions inoperative, and would enact new provisions to become operative, on the date on which the superior court issues the final approval order for the settlement agreement related to the disposition of excess properties acquired for the State Route 238 Hayward Bypass Project signed by the department, the City of Hayward, and representatives for members of the class of residents, or on January 1, 2010, whichever comes later. The new provisions would, among other things, require monetary assistance to eligible tenant households and provision of 237 additional new low-income housing units. The new provisions would also require the department to offer the direct sale of eligible excess single-family residences on an as-is, fair market value basis, to current tenants meeting specified requirements and would enact other related provisions in that regard. The bill would authorize proceeds from the sale of excess properties to be used for the cost of selling the properties and various administrative, commercial, or legal costs, including program administration costs to develop and administer the home purchase program and an administrative hearing process for tenants. Existing law provides for state highways to be constructed, as determined by the California Transportation Commission, on routes authorized by law. Existing law provides for relinquishment by the commission of state highways to local agencies under certain conditions. This bill would authorize the commission to relinquish portions of State Highway Routes 92, 185, and 238 in the City of Hayward to that city subject to various conditions.
- Who sponsors AB 1386?
- AB 1386 is sponsored by Corbett and Hayashi.
- What is the current status of AB 1386?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1386?
- Track AB 1386 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1386
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1386
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →