SB 1130 — Corrections: Prison Industry Authority.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides that there is in existence within the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation the Prison Industry Authority under the direction of the Prison Industry Board. Under existing law, the authority has jurisdiction over the operation of all industrial, agricultural, and service enterprises employing prisoners in institutions under the jurisdiction of the department and has the power to establish new enterprises which it deems appropriate. Under existing law, products made by enterprises under the authority's jurisdiction shall be purchased by the state or a state agency, and may be purchased by a local agency or by a state agency to be offered for sale to persons residing in state-operated institutions at prices fixed by the authority. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding requirements imposed on state agencies to purchase Prison Industry Authority products, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall not be restricted from entering into contracts with private entities or other public agencies for locally produced perishable goods provided at a lower price than the price available from the Prison Industry Authority, provided that the contract is to provide these goods to a facility that is located in a county with a population of 50,000 or less.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/02/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 02, 2010
- Amended 05/26/10 - Amended Senate pdf May 26, 2010
- Amended 05/12/10 - Amended Senate pdf May 12, 2010
- Amended 04/05/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 05, 2010
- Introduced 02/18/10 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2010
- SB1130 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
From committee without further action.
-
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 5989.)
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.)
-
To Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 8. Page 3722.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3594.)
-
(For vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 24.
-
Set, final hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 5. Noes 4. Page 3547.) Reconsideration granted.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 17.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing May 10.
-
Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 26.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3180.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 13.
-
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Aanestad · Primary
- Chesbro · Cosponsor
- Huber · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Aanestad
Co-sponsors (2)
- Chesbro
- Huber
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 8 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 21% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Nay |
| Steinberg | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 45% | 36% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 17% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1130 do?
- Existing law provides that there is in existence within the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation the Prison Industry Authority under the direction of the Prison Industry Board. Under existing law, the authority has jurisdiction over the operation of all industrial, agricultural, and service enterprises employing prisoners in institutions under the jurisdiction of the department and has the power to establish new enterprises which it deems appropriate. Under existing law, products made by enterprises under the authority's jurisdiction shall be purchased by the state or a state agency, and may be purchased by a local agency or by a state agency to be offered for sale to persons residing in state-operated institutions at prices fixed by the authority. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding requirements imposed on state agencies to purchase Prison Industry Authority products, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall not be restricted from entering into contracts with private entities or other public agencies for locally produced perishable goods provided at a lower price than the price available from the Prison Industry Authority, provided that the contract is to provide these goods to a facility that is located in a county with a population of 50,000 or less.
- Who sponsors SB 1130?
- SB 1130 is sponsored by Aanestad, Chesbro, and Huber.
- What is the current status of SB 1130?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1130?
- Track SB 1130 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1130
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1130
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →