SB 822 — Property taxation: local administration.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 204, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the creation of an assessor's office in each county, and requires the assessor's office to determine the new base year value for taxable real property that has been newly constructed. Existing law requires an assessee or his or her designee to file with the city, county, or city and county, a scale copy of the floor plans and exterior dimensions of the building designated for the county assessor at the time the assessee files, or causes to be filed, an approved set of building plans. This bill would authorize the county assessor to require the floor plans to be provided to the assessor in an electronic format, if available. (2) Existing property tax law authorizes each county board of supervisors to exempt from property taxation those properties having a full value too low to justify the costs of assessment and collection, and limits any exemption granted by each county board of supervisors to property with a value not exceeding $5,000. This bill would increase the limit for this exemption from $5,000 to $10,000. (3) The California Constitution authorizes the exemption from property taxation of the principal residence of a disabled veteran, or a veteran's spouse, in the case in which a person has, as a result of a service-connected disease or injury, become disabled or died while on active duty in military service. Existing property tax law requires the State Board of Equalization to prescribe all procedures and forms required to carry into effect any property tax exemption. This bill would authorize county assessors to supply specified information from disabled veterans' property tax exemption claims and county records at the written request of the board, in order to prevent duplications of the disabled veterans' property tax exemption within the state and improper overlapping with other benefits provided by law. (4) Existing law requires taxpayers that meet certain criteria to file a signed property statement with the county assessor. Existing law authorizes a taxpayer, in lieu of completing the property statement as printed by the assessor, to furnish the information required as attachments to the property statement, provided that one copy of the property statement is signed by the taxpayer and contains an appropriate reference to the data attached, or the property statement is filed electronically and authenticated, as specified. This bill would authorize a taxpayer to complete a property statement that is substantially similar to the property statement as printed by the assessor, as provided, in lieu of completing the property statement as printed by the assessor, and would authorize the assessor to consider the information provided by the taxpayer, in lieu of completing the property statement as printed by the assessor, as the property statement. (5) Existing law prohibits a county assessor from making a separate valuation of any parcel covered by a subdivision map filed for record after the lien date immediately preceding the current fiscal year. This bill would provide that this prohibition does not apply in any county in which the board of supervisors provides for a separate valuation pursuant to an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the board.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/10/09 - Enrolled pdf September 10, 2009
- Amended 08/31/09 - Amended Assembly pdf August 31, 2009
- Amended 06/23/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 23, 2009
- Introduced 03/10/09 - Introduced pdf March 10, 2009
- SB822 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 204, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2328.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2886.) To Senate.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 2826.) To third reading.
-
Placed on third reading.
-
From Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on July 15.)
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)
-
(Heard in committee on July 1.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and APPR.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.)
-
To Coms. on REV. & TAX. and L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 829.) To Assembly.
-
To Special Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 4.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 639.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
To Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after April 10.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Revenue and Taxation · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Revenue and Taxation
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 84 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 822 do?
- (1) Existing law provides for the creation of an assessor's office in each county, and requires the assessor's office to determine the new base year value for taxable real property that has been newly constructed. Existing law requires an assessee or his or her designee to file with the city, county, or city and county, a scale copy of the floor plans and exterior dimensions of the building designated for the county assessor at the time the assessee files, or causes to be filed, an approved set of building plans. This bill would authorize the county assessor to require the floor plans to be provided to the assessor in an electronic format, if available. (2) Existing property tax law authorizes each county board of supervisors to exempt from property taxation those properties having a full value too low to justify the costs of assessment and collection, and limits any exemption granted by each county board of supervisors to property with a value not exceeding $5,000. This bill would increase the limit for this exemption from $5,000 to $10,000. (3) The California Constitution authorizes the exemption from property taxation of the principal residence of a disabled veteran, or a veteran's spouse, in the case in which a person has, as a result of a service-connected disease or injury, become disabled or died while on active duty in military service. Existing property tax law requires the State Board of Equalization to prescribe all procedures and forms required to carry into effect any property tax exemption. This bill would authorize county assessors to supply specified information from disabled veterans' property tax exemption claims and county records at the written request of the board, in order to prevent duplications of the disabled veterans' property tax exemption within the state and improper overlapping with other benefits provided by law. (4) Existing law requires taxpayers that meet certain criteria to file a signed property statement with the county assessor. Existing law authorizes a taxpayer, in lieu of completing the property statement as printed by the assessor, to furnish the information required as attachments to the property statement, provided that one copy of the property statement is signed by the taxpayer and contains an appropriate reference to the data attached, or the property statement is filed electronically and authenticated, as specified. This bill would authorize a taxpayer to complete a property statement that is substantially similar to the property statement as printed by the assessor, as provided, in lieu of completing the property statement as printed by the assessor, and would authorize the assessor to consider the information provided by the taxpayer, in lieu of completing the property statement as printed by the assessor, as the property statement. (5) Existing law prohibits a county assessor from making a separate valuation of any parcel covered by a subdivision map filed for record after the lien date immediately preceding the current fiscal year. This bill would provide that this prohibition does not apply in any county in which the board of supervisors provides for a separate valuation pursuant to an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the board.
- Who sponsors SB 822?
- SB 822 is sponsored by Committee on Revenue and Taxation.
- What is the current status of SB 822?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 822?
- Track SB 822 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 822
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 822
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →