California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 R cosponsors

SB 1007 — Political Reform Act of 1974: retirement system boards.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 633, Statutes of 2010.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

The Political Reform Act of 1974 provides for the comprehensive regulation of campaign financing and requires candidates for elective office, candidates for elective state office, and committees formed or existing primarily to support or oppose those candidates to file specified reports disclosing contributions and independent expenditures made in connection with the campaigns of those candidates. Existing law further establishes the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System to administer the Public Employees' Retirement System and the Teachers' Retirement Board to administer the State Teachers' Retirement System. Existing law specifies the composition of those boards and requires that designated positions on the boards be filled by election. With limited exception, as specified, candidates for election to those boards are not required to comply with the various reporting requirements imposed by the Political Reform Act of 1974. This bill would revise the definitions of "elective office" and "elective state office" for purposes of the Political Reform Act of 1974 to include membership on the boards described above and would repeal the provision that exempts from the act candidates for election to those boards, thereby subjecting those candidates, and committees formed or existing primarily to support or oppose those candidates, to the reporting requirements of the act. The bill would further make conforming changes to provisions of the act relating to the reporting of late contributions, the reporting of late independent expenditures, the filing of committee organization statements, and the filing of campaign statements and preelection statements. In addition, the bill would give the Fair Political Practices Commission the authority to adopt regulations to tailor the act's reporting and disclosure requirements for those candidates and committees consistent with the purposes and provisions of the act. Existing law makes a knowing or willful violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 a misdemeanor and subjects offenders to criminal penalties. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating additional crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 633, Statutes of 2010.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4659.) To enrollment.

  5. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 73. Noes 1. Page 6250.) To Senate.

  7. Read second time. To third reading.

  8. (Heard in committee on August 4.)

  9. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.)

  10. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  11. (Heard in committee on June 22.)

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.)

  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.

  14. To Com. on E. & R.

  15. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  16. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 3278.) To Assembly.

  17. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  18. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be placed on Consent Calendar.

  19. Set for hearing April 26.

  20. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3102.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., R., & C.A.

  22. Set for hearing April 6.

  23. To Com. on E., R., & C.A.

  24. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 13.

  25. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Tony Strickland · Cosponsor
  • DeSaulnier · Cosponsor
  • Denham · Cosponsor
  • Hancock · Primary
  • Gatto · Cosponsor
  • Liu · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 116 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Hancock

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (116)

116 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 116 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB1007 Hancock

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33003
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 36003
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Ashburn — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SB 1007 Hancock Senate Third Reading By HERNANDEZ

Passed 84 Yea · 1 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 79105
Democratic 2001
Republican 3000
Total 84106
% of votes cast 92%1%0%7%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hill — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Norby — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Charles — Not Voting
Davis — Not Voting
Bass — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Knight — Not Voting
Adams — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 18 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 17100
Democratic 1000
Total 18100
% of votes cast 95%5%0%0%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hall — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Conway — Yea
Miller — Yea
Norby — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Consent Calendar 2nd SB1007 Hancock

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31006
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 34006
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Not Voting
Huff — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Not Voting
Ashburn — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cox — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

elections
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1007 do?
The Political Reform Act of 1974 provides for the comprehensive regulation of campaign financing and requires candidates for elective office, candidates for elective state office, and committees formed or existing primarily to support or oppose those candidates to file specified reports disclosing contributions and independent expenditures made in connection with the campaigns of those candidates. Existing law further establishes the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System to administer the Public Employees' Retirement System and the Teachers' Retirement Board to administer the State Teachers' Retirement System. Existing law specifies the composition of those boards and requires that designated positions on the boards be filled by election. With limited exception, as specified, candidates for election to those boards are not required to comply with the various reporting requirements imposed by the Political Reform Act of 1974. This bill would revise the definitions of "elective office" and "elective state office" for purposes of the Political Reform Act of 1974 to include membership on the boards described above and would repeal the provision that exempts from the act candidates for election to those boards, thereby subjecting those candidates, and committees formed or existing primarily to support or oppose those candidates, to the reporting requirements of the act. The bill would further make conforming changes to provisions of the act relating to the reporting of late contributions, the reporting of late independent expenditures, the filing of committee organization statements, and the filing of campaign statements and preelection statements. In addition, the bill would give the Fair Political Practices Commission the authority to adopt regulations to tailor the act's reporting and disclosure requirements for those candidates and committees consistent with the purposes and provisions of the act. Existing law makes a knowing or willful violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 a misdemeanor and subjects offenders to criminal penalties. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating additional crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
Who sponsors SB 1007?
SB 1007 is sponsored by Strickland, Tony (Republican), DeSaulnier, Denham, Hancock, Gatto, and Liu.
What is the current status of SB 1007?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1007?
Track SB 1007 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1007

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1007

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →